![]() | Douglass Park has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of modern photos of the park be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Chicago may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of June 8, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:
Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. — GrooveDog 19:07, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. For further development, a picture or two from the current day would certainly be desirable. Lampman ( talk) 02:40, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: move per WP:NAMINGCRITERIA. The concerns about the park and neighbourhood being the same name are addressed with hatnotes. -- Alan Liefting ( talk - contribs) 03:05, 27 January 2013 (UTC) -- Alan Liefting ( talk - contribs) 03:05, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
– change to make consistent with other Chicago parks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kjkjl555 ( talk • contribs) 19:05, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
The park has been officially renamed from Douglas Park to Douglass Park. I've updated the article to reflect that, here. So, the article should be renamed accordingly. I think it would be best to rename the article to "Douglass Park". There's no need to disambiguate the title with "(Chicago)". — Mudwater ( Talk) 11:19, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
In thinking about this further, I believe renaming this article from "Douglas Park (Chicago)" to "Douglass Park" will be uncontroversial, now that the park has been officially renamed. So, I'm going to proceed with that. — Mudwater ( Talk) 14:33, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
![]() | Douglass Park has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of modern photos of the park be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Chicago may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of June 8, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:
Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. — GrooveDog 19:07, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. For further development, a picture or two from the current day would certainly be desirable. Lampman ( talk) 02:40, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: move per WP:NAMINGCRITERIA. The concerns about the park and neighbourhood being the same name are addressed with hatnotes. -- Alan Liefting ( talk - contribs) 03:05, 27 January 2013 (UTC) -- Alan Liefting ( talk - contribs) 03:05, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
– change to make consistent with other Chicago parks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kjkjl555 ( talk • contribs) 19:05, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
The park has been officially renamed from Douglas Park to Douglass Park. I've updated the article to reflect that, here. So, the article should be renamed accordingly. I think it would be best to rename the article to "Douglass Park". There's no need to disambiguate the title with "(Chicago)". — Mudwater ( Talk) 11:19, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
In thinking about this further, I believe renaming this article from "Douglas Park (Chicago)" to "Douglass Park" will be uncontroversial, now that the park has been officially renamed. So, I'm going to proceed with that. — Mudwater ( Talk) 14:33, 21 November 2020 (UTC)