![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
Request sent to WP:MEDCAB for mediation regarding propriety of Duke University as disambig. Duke EGR 93 13:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Just because fans of Duke athletic teams may not like the use of the term "Dook" does not mean that they should be allowed to remove that definition. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.88.64.5 ( talk) 20:46, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Discussed at length? I only see one other sentence (a request for mediation) on this Discussion page. Also, why would a decision be made to leave out a truthful definition? That goes against the spirit of Wikipedia - to share information. You have been reported for violating 3RR, by the way. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.88.64.5 ( talk) 22:22, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Then that means there's nothing wrong with my reversions of your vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.88.64.5 ( talk) 14:20, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Show me where this supposed "discussion at length" is. You haven't. I wonder why. There was no prior discussion here. Go ahead and continue to THREATEN me. I see no evidence that you are an admin. And I am no more likely to be banned than you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.88.64.5 ( talk) 15:20, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Enjoy, — Noah 05:12, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
— Noah 05:41, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
One overarching question I have is whether this page is done correctly at all. It is supposedly a disambiguation page, but seems more like a definition list - there are no pages with titles Dook (blah) for example. Which is not quite right, since the Wikipedia:Disambiguation page says not to include dictionary definitions. Perhaps this should be linked over to Wiktionary? Duke EGR 93 17:28, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Bejinhan brought up a good point on the Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2009-08-02/Dook page about where the conversation should be. My recommendation is that anything relative to the specific issue of adding a definition related to Duke University be placed on the MEDCAB page. That'll make sure the history of the discussion is maintained in a meaningful way relative to the purpose of mediation. Duke EGR 93 02:38, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
My edit summary regarding the reversion to the spelling aipple in Scots was slightly inaccurate. The CSD uses this spelling, amongst others but not aiple, but not the cited page 154 regarding dookin for them as I may have implied. SND/DSL, incidentally, also uses this spelling. Mutt Lunker ( talk)
![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
Request sent to WP:MEDCAB for mediation regarding propriety of Duke University as disambig. Duke EGR 93 13:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Just because fans of Duke athletic teams may not like the use of the term "Dook" does not mean that they should be allowed to remove that definition. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.88.64.5 ( talk) 20:46, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Discussed at length? I only see one other sentence (a request for mediation) on this Discussion page. Also, why would a decision be made to leave out a truthful definition? That goes against the spirit of Wikipedia - to share information. You have been reported for violating 3RR, by the way. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.88.64.5 ( talk) 22:22, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Then that means there's nothing wrong with my reversions of your vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.88.64.5 ( talk) 14:20, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Show me where this supposed "discussion at length" is. You haven't. I wonder why. There was no prior discussion here. Go ahead and continue to THREATEN me. I see no evidence that you are an admin. And I am no more likely to be banned than you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.88.64.5 ( talk) 15:20, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Enjoy, — Noah 05:12, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
— Noah 05:41, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
One overarching question I have is whether this page is done correctly at all. It is supposedly a disambiguation page, but seems more like a definition list - there are no pages with titles Dook (blah) for example. Which is not quite right, since the Wikipedia:Disambiguation page says not to include dictionary definitions. Perhaps this should be linked over to Wiktionary? Duke EGR 93 17:28, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Bejinhan brought up a good point on the Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2009-08-02/Dook page about where the conversation should be. My recommendation is that anything relative to the specific issue of adding a definition related to Duke University be placed on the MEDCAB page. That'll make sure the history of the discussion is maintained in a meaningful way relative to the purpose of mediation. Duke EGR 93 02:38, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
My edit summary regarding the reversion to the spelling aipple in Scots was slightly inaccurate. The CSD uses this spelling, amongst others but not aiple, but not the cited page 154 regarding dookin for them as I may have implied. SND/DSL, incidentally, also uses this spelling. Mutt Lunker ( talk)