Domino Sugar Refinery has been listed as one of the
Art and architecture good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 23, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
The contents of the Domino Sugar Refinery Redevelopment page were merged into Domino Sugar Refinery. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
A fact from Domino Sugar Refinery appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 9 August 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Domino Sugar Refinery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:06, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Domino Sugar Refinery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:52, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Domino Sugar Refinery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://gothamist.com/2017/02/16/87000_people_applied_for_affordable.php?scrlybrkrWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:01, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Eddie891 ( talk · contribs) 16:26, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I plan to review this article shortly... Eddie891 Talk Work 16:26, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
That's a very good article, nice insight into how the "satanic mills" actually worked. Perhaps it's size and share of national production should be emphasized in the lead; it's amazing that such a share once concentrated in a single plant. About photographs. None of them shows present-day appearance of the historic structure (as seen e.g. on googlemaps); the one in the infobox also shows demolished buildings on the right with the misleading caption "The oldest standing buildings ...". I'd recommend clarifying what's standing and what's gone right in the captions (or, perhaps, add year of each photo?). Retired electrician ( talk) 22:50, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
As usual, very well done, just some highly subjective comments, nothing major. Referencing checks etc will follow. Eddie891 Talk Work 00:22, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
. By 1870, more than half of the sugar consumed in the entire country was refined there,and
by 1870 more than half of the sugar consumed in the entire country was refined here.is too close for comfort
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk)
13:02, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius ( talk). Self-nominated at 00:55, 23 July 2020 (UTC).
My eyes on you Rails sway ( talk) 14:18, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Domino Sugar Refinery has been listed as one of the
Art and architecture good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 23, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
The contents of the Domino Sugar Refinery Redevelopment page were merged into Domino Sugar Refinery. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
A fact from Domino Sugar Refinery appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 9 August 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Domino Sugar Refinery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:06, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Domino Sugar Refinery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:52, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Domino Sugar Refinery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://gothamist.com/2017/02/16/87000_people_applied_for_affordable.php?scrlybrkrWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:01, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Eddie891 ( talk · contribs) 16:26, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I plan to review this article shortly... Eddie891 Talk Work 16:26, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
That's a very good article, nice insight into how the "satanic mills" actually worked. Perhaps it's size and share of national production should be emphasized in the lead; it's amazing that such a share once concentrated in a single plant. About photographs. None of them shows present-day appearance of the historic structure (as seen e.g. on googlemaps); the one in the infobox also shows demolished buildings on the right with the misleading caption "The oldest standing buildings ...". I'd recommend clarifying what's standing and what's gone right in the captions (or, perhaps, add year of each photo?). Retired electrician ( talk) 22:50, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
As usual, very well done, just some highly subjective comments, nothing major. Referencing checks etc will follow. Eddie891 Talk Work 00:22, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
. By 1870, more than half of the sugar consumed in the entire country was refined there,and
by 1870 more than half of the sugar consumed in the entire country was refined here.is too close for comfort
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk)
13:02, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius ( talk). Self-nominated at 00:55, 23 July 2020 (UTC).
My eyes on you Rails sway ( talk) 14:18, 9 August 2020 (UTC)