A fact from Dominic Olejniczak appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 5 June 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Dominic Olejniczak has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
Dominic Olejniczak is part of the Green Bay Packers presidents series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Harrias ( talk · contribs) 17:04, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
I'll take a look at this shortly. Harrias (he/him) • talk 17:04, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
2. Verifiable with no original research:
- it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
- reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);
- it contains no original research; and
- it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
I'm going to stop this review for the moment to give you time to work on the sourcing issues raised above. Please check through every single source in the article to ensure that all facts presented in the article are present in the source material. Once you're happy, ping me, and I'll carry out further spotchecks. I'll stick the nomination on hold for the time being. Harrias (he/him) • talk 10:14, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Beyond these two, the rest of the sourcing looks fine.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
- media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
- media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
1. Well-written:
- the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
- it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
(roughly equivalent to ${{inflation|US|0.1|1950|r=2}}{{nbsp}}million in {{Inflation/year|US}})
to give "..that generated over $100,000 (roughly equivalent to $1.27 million in 2023) in revenue.." for context.3. Broad in its coverage:
- it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
- it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
@ Gonzo fan2007: That's a wrap I think. Harrias (he/him) • talk 09:56, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Lightburst (
talk)
21:28, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Gonzo fan2007 ( talk). Self-nominated at 20:55, 26 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Dominic Olejniczak; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Newly promoted GA. Appears to meet all the criteria. Hook is just under the limit and is interesting. QPQ done. Looks good to go. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 16:58, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
A fact from Dominic Olejniczak appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 5 June 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Dominic Olejniczak has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
Dominic Olejniczak is part of the Green Bay Packers presidents series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Harrias ( talk · contribs) 17:04, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
I'll take a look at this shortly. Harrias (he/him) • talk 17:04, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
2. Verifiable with no original research:
- it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
- reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);
- it contains no original research; and
- it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
I'm going to stop this review for the moment to give you time to work on the sourcing issues raised above. Please check through every single source in the article to ensure that all facts presented in the article are present in the source material. Once you're happy, ping me, and I'll carry out further spotchecks. I'll stick the nomination on hold for the time being. Harrias (he/him) • talk 10:14, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Beyond these two, the rest of the sourcing looks fine.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
- media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
- media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
1. Well-written:
- the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
- it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
(roughly equivalent to ${{inflation|US|0.1|1950|r=2}}{{nbsp}}million in {{Inflation/year|US}})
to give "..that generated over $100,000 (roughly equivalent to $1.27 million in 2023) in revenue.." for context.3. Broad in its coverage:
- it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
- it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
@ Gonzo fan2007: That's a wrap I think. Harrias (he/him) • talk 09:56, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Lightburst (
talk)
21:28, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Gonzo fan2007 ( talk). Self-nominated at 20:55, 26 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Dominic Olejniczak; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Newly promoted GA. Appears to meet all the criteria. Hook is just under the limit and is interesting. QPQ done. Looks good to go. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 16:58, 27 May 2023 (UTC)