The Lead does not adequately summarise the whole article. Please read
WP:LEAD for guidelines. I would also like you to look at the
WP:External links and see if they are all necessary and add encyclopaedic content.Y
Just the concerns noted above to be addressed, on hold for seven days, major contributors and projects will be notified.
Jezhotwells (
talk) 21:18, 15 November 2009 (UTC)reply
I see some work is being done - are you ready for me to have another look?
Jezhotwells (
talk) 18:58, 21 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Nothing has been done about the lead - it should be at least 3 paras for an article like this and summarise the whole article. Still has one dead link
[1], which is geocities and not RS anyway. I moved the book into further reading and formatted the citation. I will take a look tomorrow and make a decision then.
Jezhotwells (
talk) 14:22, 22 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Thanks for fixing that. I fixed the last remaining dead link and expanded the lead per above. Note that
MOS indicates that the appropriate length of the lead is 2-3 paragraphs for articles of this size.
Elekhh (
talk) 00:35, 23 November 2009 (UTC)reply
OK, I am happy to confirm that this article is worthy of GA status. Thanks for your hard work.
Jezhotwells (
talk) 14:46, 23 November 2009 (UTC)reply
The Lead does not adequately summarise the whole article. Please read
WP:LEAD for guidelines. I would also like you to look at the
WP:External links and see if they are all necessary and add encyclopaedic content.Y
Just the concerns noted above to be addressed, on hold for seven days, major contributors and projects will be notified.
Jezhotwells (
talk) 21:18, 15 November 2009 (UTC)reply
I see some work is being done - are you ready for me to have another look?
Jezhotwells (
talk) 18:58, 21 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Nothing has been done about the lead - it should be at least 3 paras for an article like this and summarise the whole article. Still has one dead link
[1], which is geocities and not RS anyway. I moved the book into further reading and formatted the citation. I will take a look tomorrow and make a decision then.
Jezhotwells (
talk) 14:22, 22 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Thanks for fixing that. I fixed the last remaining dead link and expanded the lead per above. Note that
MOS indicates that the appropriate length of the lead is 2-3 paragraphs for articles of this size.
Elekhh (
talk) 00:35, 23 November 2009 (UTC)reply
OK, I am happy to confirm that this article is worthy of GA status. Thanks for your hard work.
Jezhotwells (
talk) 14:46, 23 November 2009 (UTC)reply