This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Disparate impact article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
"Adverse Impact is also known as unintentional discrimination..." What!? Again... the article is about Disparate Impact. On those lines, this is just another iteration of the intro to the whole article, yet it purports to be a unique section of the article?
In the legal world, a link to a dictionary is absolutely worthless. The verbiage describing a disparate impact and what a facially neutral employment practice are, are 100% junk. Cite a case, or a law review article, or an ALR, or a CorpusJuris, or an AmJur, or SOMETHING. JUNK! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.72.190.19 ( talk) 02:36, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Agreed. What an embarrassment. It's too bad the deletionists don't make themselves useful and actually do something useful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AustinBrister ( talk • contribs) 07:14, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
The 4/5's rule needs to be expressed more clearly. PhilipDSullivan 18:19, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
I am going to remove the links that take the reader to deleted or never created pages. PhilipDSullivan 18:19, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
"Disparate impact" redirects to this page, but disparate impact is a much more general concept, which applies to more than just employment. Heqwm ( talk) 22:40, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
This section should be CAREFULLY edited by someone familiar with a recent United States Supreme Court ruling on the disparate impact implications of the Fair Housing Act of 1968. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.54.209.228 ( talk) 02:26, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Disparate impact. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:36, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Disparate impact article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
"Adverse Impact is also known as unintentional discrimination..." What!? Again... the article is about Disparate Impact. On those lines, this is just another iteration of the intro to the whole article, yet it purports to be a unique section of the article?
In the legal world, a link to a dictionary is absolutely worthless. The verbiage describing a disparate impact and what a facially neutral employment practice are, are 100% junk. Cite a case, or a law review article, or an ALR, or a CorpusJuris, or an AmJur, or SOMETHING. JUNK! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.72.190.19 ( talk) 02:36, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Agreed. What an embarrassment. It's too bad the deletionists don't make themselves useful and actually do something useful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AustinBrister ( talk • contribs) 07:14, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
The 4/5's rule needs to be expressed more clearly. PhilipDSullivan 18:19, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
I am going to remove the links that take the reader to deleted or never created pages. PhilipDSullivan 18:19, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
"Disparate impact" redirects to this page, but disparate impact is a much more general concept, which applies to more than just employment. Heqwm ( talk) 22:40, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
This section should be CAREFULLY edited by someone familiar with a recent United States Supreme Court ruling on the disparate impact implications of the Fair Housing Act of 1968. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.54.209.228 ( talk) 02:26, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Disparate impact. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:36, 13 December 2016 (UTC)