This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Sailing Low‑importance Discovery 7.9 is within the scope of the WikiProject Sailing, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Sailing. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.SailingWikipedia:WikiProject SailingTemplate:WikiProject SailingSailing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Canada Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Scotland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Name Information

The sales brochure clearly names the boat as the "Discovery 79," and the sail insignia is "D79" and not "D7.9." The Grampian Owner's website calls it the "Discovery 7.9." Is there some Grampian-sourced literature that refers to the boat as the "7.9" and not the "79?" Susan Davis ( talk) 14:56, 1 November 2019 (UTC) reply

We are relying here on the cited third party ref. Is there a copy of the original brochure or other official documents available on line anywhere to support "79" instead of "7.9"?? - Ahunt ( talk) 16:08, 1 November 2019 (UTC) reply