This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Animals Low‑importance Diictodon is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Animals To-do: history watch purge Here are some Open Tasks : Copyedit: Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species. Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae), Requests: Mammals: Invertebrates: Campocraspedon Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species. Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration Palaeontology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I believe this is pronounced di-ect-o-don- I'm not sure how to present this pronunciation IPA style, but I'm sure this is causing some confusion to people who hear the name without seeing the spelling. Please help us out if you can Cuvtixo ( talk) 01:18, 15 September 2008 (UTC) reply

I strongly disagree with the citing of the BBC dino book, especially as a single source! Only the scientific literature should be referenced! This article should be fixed up soon! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.112.48.72 ( talk) 20:59, 30 June 2009 (UTC) reply

[1] May clear things up...-- 76.112.48.72 ( talk) 21:04, 30 June 2009 (UTC) reply