From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This sentence should be deleted:

This complexity issue was resolved by Vahid Tarokh and Ilmin Kim in 2002.

Which complexity issue is resolved by that paper? There is no point in reffeing to this paper in this entry. The paper hasn't received much attention in the research community and it is not considered as an important paper on the differential space-time codes. BorzouBarzegar 19:10, 3 March 2006 (UTC) reply

I am inclined to agree; it was also only a letter to Trans. Info. Th. and the article is not about all non-coherent space-time schems, but about differential space-time codes as you rightly observe. So perhaps we should purge both the mention of the Marzetta/Hochwald papers and the Tarokh paper and retain only references dealing with DSTCs. You should just go ahead if you agree - Splash talk 21:47, 3 March 2006 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This sentence should be deleted:

This complexity issue was resolved by Vahid Tarokh and Ilmin Kim in 2002.

Which complexity issue is resolved by that paper? There is no point in reffeing to this paper in this entry. The paper hasn't received much attention in the research community and it is not considered as an important paper on the differential space-time codes. BorzouBarzegar 19:10, 3 March 2006 (UTC) reply

I am inclined to agree; it was also only a letter to Trans. Info. Th. and the article is not about all non-coherent space-time schems, but about differential space-time codes as you rightly observe. So perhaps we should purge both the mention of the Marzetta/Hochwald papers and the Tarokh paper and retain only references dealing with DSTCs. You should just go ahead if you agree - Splash talk 21:47, 3 March 2006 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook