![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
@ Praxidicae: Can you explain what you mean in your edit summary by "serious BLP concerns, sourcing concerns and potentially safety"? I understand moving it to "Detention of..." per the recent RM at Detention of Mark Bernstein and WP:BLP1E, but draftification I don't understand. Levivich 18:30, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
If it helps with anything, just for the record, I would support the move of the article back into the main space, even if I understand the option might be debatable and might need a discussion first. -- NoonIcarus ( talk) 23:08, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
@ Primefac: You OS'd a bunch of stuff from the draft but didn't OS (at least one instance of) the username, which I assume was... :-) an oversight? :-) :-) Anyway, it seems like a whole paragraph was removed, but I don't remember what was in it. I'm working on expanding this draft with more sources and will probably move it to mainspace later today. Can you leave some guidance about what OS is declaring in/out? I don't care much about the username (it's mentioned in some but not all sources), but the sources do give a bunch of info about the editing history, articles that were edited, and the December block, which I think was in the paragraph you removed (but I don't remember and can't see it). I'll wait until you remove the username (assuming you're going to do that) before making further edits so I don't create new revisions that need OSing. Thanks, Levivich 15:21, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
You do not need to list every article edited with relation to this story in order to get the point across.Huh? He was charged for making three edits to two articles. I don't understand the phrase "list every article" when there are only two articles. Surely you don't mean list one and not the other, and surely you don't mean list neither, cuz that would leave the article very incomplete.
Prosecutor Elena Tikhanovich presented three facts at the trial:
- in Wikipedia, Pavel Pernikov added a paragraph about the murder of Gennady Shutov in Brest, as well as about the unwillingness of the Belarusian authorities to take responsibility for such deaths;
- in Wikipedia, in the article on censorship, he added a mention of the murder in 2004 of journalist Veronika Cherkasova;
- posted an article on torture and death in places of detention on the website of a human rights organization.
The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by
Flibirigit (
talk) 10:47, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Moved to mainspace by Homoatrox ( talk) and Levivich ( talk). Nominated by Levivich and Homoatrox ( talk) at 18:40, 21 April 2022 (UTC).
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
@ Praxidicae: Can you explain what you mean in your edit summary by "serious BLP concerns, sourcing concerns and potentially safety"? I understand moving it to "Detention of..." per the recent RM at Detention of Mark Bernstein and WP:BLP1E, but draftification I don't understand. Levivich 18:30, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
If it helps with anything, just for the record, I would support the move of the article back into the main space, even if I understand the option might be debatable and might need a discussion first. -- NoonIcarus ( talk) 23:08, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
@ Primefac: You OS'd a bunch of stuff from the draft but didn't OS (at least one instance of) the username, which I assume was... :-) an oversight? :-) :-) Anyway, it seems like a whole paragraph was removed, but I don't remember what was in it. I'm working on expanding this draft with more sources and will probably move it to mainspace later today. Can you leave some guidance about what OS is declaring in/out? I don't care much about the username (it's mentioned in some but not all sources), but the sources do give a bunch of info about the editing history, articles that were edited, and the December block, which I think was in the paragraph you removed (but I don't remember and can't see it). I'll wait until you remove the username (assuming you're going to do that) before making further edits so I don't create new revisions that need OSing. Thanks, Levivich 15:21, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
You do not need to list every article edited with relation to this story in order to get the point across.Huh? He was charged for making three edits to two articles. I don't understand the phrase "list every article" when there are only two articles. Surely you don't mean list one and not the other, and surely you don't mean list neither, cuz that would leave the article very incomplete.
Prosecutor Elena Tikhanovich presented three facts at the trial:
- in Wikipedia, Pavel Pernikov added a paragraph about the murder of Gennady Shutov in Brest, as well as about the unwillingness of the Belarusian authorities to take responsibility for such deaths;
- in Wikipedia, in the article on censorship, he added a mention of the murder in 2004 of journalist Veronika Cherkasova;
- posted an article on torture and death in places of detention on the website of a human rights organization.
The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by
Flibirigit (
talk) 10:47, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Moved to mainspace by Homoatrox ( talk) and Levivich ( talk). Nominated by Levivich and Homoatrox ( talk) at 18:40, 21 April 2022 (UTC).