![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
I'm pretty sure this is a joke:
"This includes attraction to both gymnosperms and angiosperms. Some arborphiles are also attracted to bryophytes; however, this symptom is less frequent. Oftentimes, an arborphile will claim saplings as his or her own offspring. You can observe arborphiles in their own natural habitat in national parks during nocturnal flights of fancy."
o.O
No reputable references from normal sexology authors about such kind of paraphilia. I browsed several thousand webpages to find a minimal rerefence to something remotely serious. The main rules for wikipedia are wikipedia:verifiability ad No original research. `' mikka (t) 22:55, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
I'm pretty sure this is a joke:
"This includes attraction to both gymnosperms and angiosperms. Some arborphiles are also attracted to bryophytes; however, this symptom is less frequent. Oftentimes, an arborphile will claim saplings as his or her own offspring. You can observe arborphiles in their own natural habitat in national parks during nocturnal flights of fancy."
o.O
No reputable references from normal sexology authors about such kind of paraphilia. I browsed several thousand webpages to find a minimal rerefence to something remotely serious. The main rules for wikipedia are wikipedia:verifiability ad No original research. `' mikka (t) 22:55, 15 April 2006 (UTC)