This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Delusion article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 120 days
![]() |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Delusion.
|
I been into page 89 of DSM V journal, the one from 2013. Not sure where these categories is coming from. They actually have a long list of types, in diagnose F22.
The formatting on the types of delusions seems to split between two different styles: listing general descriptions of delusions and giving specific insight into delusions. I am new to Wikipedia editing, so I am avoiding changing anything that requires a higher levels of understanding to inform the general public. However, if anyone of better qualification sees this, I would recommend deleting the general listings and instead furthering the number of delusions with in-depth research. LightningKing72 ( talk) 19:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
The listed descriptive characteristics of "Delusion" might well reasonably apply to the phenomenon of people experiencing transgender ideation or tendencies. Is there any non-political reason these two conditions should not be linked for cross-reference? Yes, it's a third-rail concept, but intellectual honesty often flies in the face of personal comfort. 71.197.121.170 ( talk) 23:37, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
the Criticism section sites critiques from David Graeber and gives his book Bullshit Jobs as a source but delusions are never mentioned in that nor is it even related to the topic of the book. I couldn't find any source of him talking about this topic so I replaced the citation with a [citation needed]. If a citation can't be found I recommend the paragraph be replaced by some else's critiques oh how delusions are understood. I can recommend Mircea Eliade, R. D. Laing, and/or Michel Foucault. LJFIN2 ( talk) 11:53, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Delusion article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 120 days
![]() |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Delusion.
|
I been into page 89 of DSM V journal, the one from 2013. Not sure where these categories is coming from. They actually have a long list of types, in diagnose F22.
The formatting on the types of delusions seems to split between two different styles: listing general descriptions of delusions and giving specific insight into delusions. I am new to Wikipedia editing, so I am avoiding changing anything that requires a higher levels of understanding to inform the general public. However, if anyone of better qualification sees this, I would recommend deleting the general listings and instead furthering the number of delusions with in-depth research. LightningKing72 ( talk) 19:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
The listed descriptive characteristics of "Delusion" might well reasonably apply to the phenomenon of people experiencing transgender ideation or tendencies. Is there any non-political reason these two conditions should not be linked for cross-reference? Yes, it's a third-rail concept, but intellectual honesty often flies in the face of personal comfort. 71.197.121.170 ( talk) 23:37, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
the Criticism section sites critiques from David Graeber and gives his book Bullshit Jobs as a source but delusions are never mentioned in that nor is it even related to the topic of the book. I couldn't find any source of him talking about this topic so I replaced the citation with a [citation needed]. If a citation can't be found I recommend the paragraph be replaced by some else's critiques oh how delusions are understood. I can recommend Mircea Eliade, R. D. Laing, and/or Michel Foucault. LJFIN2 ( talk) 11:53, 12 June 2024 (UTC)