![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following sources:
|
The Building Materials Reuse Association will be having its next international conference on building deconstruction and materials reuse, May 14-16, 2007 at the University of Wisconsin - Madison, Memorial Union. Stayed tuned and look for more details at the BMRA website www.buildingreuse.org== POV ==
this:
can potentially support communities by providing local jobs and renovated structures. Deconstruction employs 3-6 workers for every one employed in a comparable demolition job.
implies that it is better when a particular work is done by more workers, which might be a POV. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.250.174.76 ( talk) 20:25, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 October 2020 and 12 December 2020. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Mikemedina1. Peer reviewers:
Vincentg1236,
Captainmarc15.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 19:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
It appears that large portions of this article (including the entire section on typical methods of deconstruction as it stands today) was written by a single editor, without citing any sources, back in 2007. Unfortunately, I'm not familiar at all with the subject matter, but I'm flagging this in the hopes that someone who is can take a stab at cleaning this article up. -- Amlz ( talk) 07:32, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
Minimize the number of links.
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following sources:
|
The Building Materials Reuse Association will be having its next international conference on building deconstruction and materials reuse, May 14-16, 2007 at the University of Wisconsin - Madison, Memorial Union. Stayed tuned and look for more details at the BMRA website www.buildingreuse.org== POV ==
this:
can potentially support communities by providing local jobs and renovated structures. Deconstruction employs 3-6 workers for every one employed in a comparable demolition job.
implies that it is better when a particular work is done by more workers, which might be a POV. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.250.174.76 ( talk) 20:25, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 October 2020 and 12 December 2020. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Mikemedina1. Peer reviewers:
Vincentg1236,
Captainmarc15.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 19:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
It appears that large portions of this article (including the entire section on typical methods of deconstruction as it stands today) was written by a single editor, without citing any sources, back in 2007. Unfortunately, I'm not familiar at all with the subject matter, but I'm flagging this in the hopes that someone who is can take a stab at cleaning this article up. -- Amlz ( talk) 07:32, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
Minimize the number of links.