This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
If you re-arrange the letters, Mangusta spells Mustang. -> No it doesn't.
Who recognizes this as the most beautiful Detomaso? I am not doubting that some may have this opinion but I would think most people would say the mid 80's Pantera is the masterpiece of Detomaso. This statement is opinion and should be removed.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
De Tomaso Mangusta. Please take a moment to review
my edit. You may add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 22:24, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I have came here to announce that I have made an edit to the article regarding the weight distribution. I can assure you that no Mangustas have ever had a 32:68 weight distribution. The manufacturer-written PDF [1] shows a 44:56 weight distribution. Even if De Tomaso did say the Mangusta had a 32/68 ratio, that would beat the rear-engined Porsche 911 in terms of rear weight distribution. No sources before 2010 have ever stated a 32/68 distribution either, according to a Google research [2]. Simply put, the 32/68 number is bogus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.215.90.113 ( talk) 00:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
If you re-arrange the letters, Mangusta spells Mustang. -> No it doesn't.
Who recognizes this as the most beautiful Detomaso? I am not doubting that some may have this opinion but I would think most people would say the mid 80's Pantera is the masterpiece of Detomaso. This statement is opinion and should be removed.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
De Tomaso Mangusta. Please take a moment to review
my edit. You may add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 22:24, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I have came here to announce that I have made an edit to the article regarding the weight distribution. I can assure you that no Mangustas have ever had a 32:68 weight distribution. The manufacturer-written PDF [1] shows a 44:56 weight distribution. Even if De Tomaso did say the Mangusta had a 32/68 ratio, that would beat the rear-engined Porsche 911 in terms of rear weight distribution. No sources before 2010 have ever stated a 32/68 distribution either, according to a Google research [2]. Simply put, the 32/68 number is bogus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.215.90.113 ( talk) 00:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)