This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why are there coordinates on this article which relates to a family? Peter I. Vardy ( talk) 19:59, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
I have reverted the article to the state it was in as of 9 December 2010 due concerns that material added by Selkcerf0142 ( talk · contribs) was copyrighted. More details can be found here. Nev1 ( talk) 14:15, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
There is an incorrect link in this article. The second sentence in the article says " The first records are about Hugh de Lacy (1020–1049). " Hugh de Lacy is a hyperlink ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_de_Lacy) that goes to the article on Hugh de Lacy who died 25 July 1186, Durrow, Leinster, - NOT the Hugh de Lacy born 1020-died 1049. As far as I can see there isn't an article on Hugh de Lacy born 1020-died 1049, so either this link needs to be removed or a new article on Hugh de Lacy born 1020-died 1049 needs to be written and the link changed to the new article. Ninanta ( talk) 23:41, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Who was the eldest son of Walter de Lacy: Roger (as said in the entry on Gilbert de Lacy) or Ilbert (as said in the entry on de Lacy)? Richard C — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.29.250.246 ( talk) 09:55, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Due to the issues above and many other flaws, I have undertaken a complete re-write of the article eliminating duplicate entries, reducing the number of sections and deprecating the dubious claims of the Austrian/Russian family of the same name. Laurel Lodged ( talk) 10:56, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
If Ilbert was born 1045, how could his grandson Henry (Ilbert's son's second son) be born 1070? Brownturkey ( talk) 09:32, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on De Lacy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:22, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum 1066-1154, volume 1 cites the following charter: 254. Grant by Hilbert de Laci and Hadrude his wife to the Holy Trinity [1067-1087] of the Mount at Rouen. Of the manor of Tuisuicz and the tithe of Freteval, for the health of his own soul and that of his lord, King William, and his wife and his son Hugh. Witnesses : King William ; Ilbert de Lacy ; Hadrude his wife. [Original at Winchester College. Archaeological Journal, vol. iv, p. 249.] Seal of Hilbert deLacy (facsimile in Arch. Journal, u.s.). Arcussenilis ( talk) 16:39, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why are there coordinates on this article which relates to a family? Peter I. Vardy ( talk) 19:59, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
I have reverted the article to the state it was in as of 9 December 2010 due concerns that material added by Selkcerf0142 ( talk · contribs) was copyrighted. More details can be found here. Nev1 ( talk) 14:15, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
There is an incorrect link in this article. The second sentence in the article says " The first records are about Hugh de Lacy (1020–1049). " Hugh de Lacy is a hyperlink ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_de_Lacy) that goes to the article on Hugh de Lacy who died 25 July 1186, Durrow, Leinster, - NOT the Hugh de Lacy born 1020-died 1049. As far as I can see there isn't an article on Hugh de Lacy born 1020-died 1049, so either this link needs to be removed or a new article on Hugh de Lacy born 1020-died 1049 needs to be written and the link changed to the new article. Ninanta ( talk) 23:41, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Who was the eldest son of Walter de Lacy: Roger (as said in the entry on Gilbert de Lacy) or Ilbert (as said in the entry on de Lacy)? Richard C — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.29.250.246 ( talk) 09:55, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Due to the issues above and many other flaws, I have undertaken a complete re-write of the article eliminating duplicate entries, reducing the number of sections and deprecating the dubious claims of the Austrian/Russian family of the same name. Laurel Lodged ( talk) 10:56, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
If Ilbert was born 1045, how could his grandson Henry (Ilbert's son's second son) be born 1070? Brownturkey ( talk) 09:32, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on De Lacy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:22, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum 1066-1154, volume 1 cites the following charter: 254. Grant by Hilbert de Laci and Hadrude his wife to the Holy Trinity [1067-1087] of the Mount at Rouen. Of the manor of Tuisuicz and the tithe of Freteval, for the health of his own soul and that of his lord, King William, and his wife and his son Hugh. Witnesses : King William ; Ilbert de Lacy ; Hadrude his wife. [Original at Winchester College. Archaeological Journal, vol. iv, p. 249.] Seal of Hilbert deLacy (facsimile in Arch. Journal, u.s.). Arcussenilis ( talk) 16:39, 25 April 2020 (UTC)