This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion. See also:
WikiProject Trains to do list and the
Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the
Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Support. As per given reasons. Any results from the inquiry can be incorporated into the article on the metro station, as they are intrinsically linked.
Autarch (
talk)
10:58, 3 November 2020 (UTC)reply
See
WP:SUSTAINED. Brief bursts of news coverage may not sufficiently demonstrate notability. Similarly, not every speech or interview by a politician warrants its own article even if hundreds of daily newspapers cover it. Newspapers cover what's noteworthy today. Encyclopedias cover what's noteworthy now and in the future.
--Animalparty! (
talk)
21:19, 4 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Support. Only time will tell if the crash has lasting effects and continued coverage. Merge the crash story into the station article now and evaluate in a couple of years if the crash warrants a separate article
Ruud Buitelaar (
talk)
15:42, 5 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Support, the station is short enough to accommodate the crash in detail. The reason the crash is notable is the whale tails sculpture holding up.--
Astral Leap (
talk)
10:12, 19 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Support, nothing particularly notable about this crash to be described except for the scenery. If you look at
Montparnasse derailment for example, there were passengers involved, a discussion on technical failures and a significant legacy section.
Pieceofmetalwork (
talk)
16:25, 16 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Support If the metro station article were long enough that it'd need to be split anyway I'd say no, but it's barely more than a stub. I agree the scenery of the crash is what made it so notable, and there's not much reporting into the other parts of it.
Uses x (
talk • {{reply to|Uses x}} •
contribs)
13:59, 26 March 2021 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion. See also:
WikiProject Trains to do list and the
Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the
Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Support. As per given reasons. Any results from the inquiry can be incorporated into the article on the metro station, as they are intrinsically linked.
Autarch (
talk)
10:58, 3 November 2020 (UTC)reply
See
WP:SUSTAINED. Brief bursts of news coverage may not sufficiently demonstrate notability. Similarly, not every speech or interview by a politician warrants its own article even if hundreds of daily newspapers cover it. Newspapers cover what's noteworthy today. Encyclopedias cover what's noteworthy now and in the future.
--Animalparty! (
talk)
21:19, 4 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Support. Only time will tell if the crash has lasting effects and continued coverage. Merge the crash story into the station article now and evaluate in a couple of years if the crash warrants a separate article
Ruud Buitelaar (
talk)
15:42, 5 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Support, the station is short enough to accommodate the crash in detail. The reason the crash is notable is the whale tails sculpture holding up.--
Astral Leap (
talk)
10:12, 19 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Support, nothing particularly notable about this crash to be described except for the scenery. If you look at
Montparnasse derailment for example, there were passengers involved, a discussion on technical failures and a significant legacy section.
Pieceofmetalwork (
talk)
16:25, 16 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Support If the metro station article were long enough that it'd need to be split anyway I'd say no, but it's barely more than a stub. I agree the scenery of the crash is what made it so notable, and there's not much reporting into the other parts of it.
Uses x (
talk • {{reply to|Uses x}} •
contribs)
13:59, 26 March 2021 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.