This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all
disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Day of reckoning → Day of Reckoning – There are 17 bulleted entries listed upon the
Day of reckoning disambiguation page, with each of those entries using an uppercase "R". An unlinked "Day of reckoning" listing at the top, which is not bulleted and serves as the putative primary topic, has no entry of its own and indicates that it is simply another expression for
Last Judgment. The lowercase "r"
Day of reckoning should redirect to the uppercase "R"
Day of Reckoning, rather than the opposite. —
Roman Spinner(talk •
contribs) 07:09, 18 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.--
Ortizesp (
talk) 21:50, 19 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Oppose The
last judgement is one use of the phrase "day of reckoning", which may appear with various permutations of caps in sources. Aint broke. Don't fix it.
Cinderella157 (
talk) 08:44, 20 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Support – not a big deal either way, but per
WP:DABNAME we generally use the spelling (and, by extension, the capitalization) used by most entries on the dab page, and the capitalized version clearly predominates.
Extraordinary Writ (
talk) 08:17, 26 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Oppose. The principal topic for this is
last judgement, which should be lower case. Unless there's a proposal to actually redirect lowercase "Day of reckoning" to
last judgement (which isn't somethign that's been proposed here) then it should absolutely stay as it is. —
Amakuru (
talk) 11:06, 26 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Well, our article currently capitalizes
Last Judgment, doesn't it? (Arguably it should be lowercased per
MOS:CAPS, but that's a question for another time.)
Extraordinary Writ (
talk) 21:02, 26 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Wheter we should capitalise the article
Last Judgment is debatable given the ngram evidence and that there are several works by this name that would normally be capitalised. None of the other bolded terms at the article would appear to satisfy the need to cap per
MOS:CAPS. There are inconsistencies that should probably be considered in respect to the primary topic that should be resolved, since the capitalisation of the primary topic directly relates to this discussion. Perhaps we should close this discussion (one way or the other) without prejudice to revisiting the matter once issues of capitalisation in the primary topic have been addressed.
Cinderella157 (
talk) 13:04, 5 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Support, per nom, every entry on the page is uppercased.
Randy Kryn (
talk) 07:58, 4 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
Shwcz (
talk) 12:25, 5 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Oppose per Cinderella157 and Amakuru. The primary topic is something we do not capitalize per
MOS:DOCTCAPS; all the works in the list are derivative uses, and are capitalized because they are titles of works. —
SMcCandlish☏¢ 😼 07:33, 6 December 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all
disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Day of reckoning → Day of Reckoning – There are 17 bulleted entries listed upon the
Day of reckoning disambiguation page, with each of those entries using an uppercase "R". An unlinked "Day of reckoning" listing at the top, which is not bulleted and serves as the putative primary topic, has no entry of its own and indicates that it is simply another expression for
Last Judgment. The lowercase "r"
Day of reckoning should redirect to the uppercase "R"
Day of Reckoning, rather than the opposite. —
Roman Spinner(talk •
contribs) 07:09, 18 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.--
Ortizesp (
talk) 21:50, 19 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Oppose The
last judgement is one use of the phrase "day of reckoning", which may appear with various permutations of caps in sources. Aint broke. Don't fix it.
Cinderella157 (
talk) 08:44, 20 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Support – not a big deal either way, but per
WP:DABNAME we generally use the spelling (and, by extension, the capitalization) used by most entries on the dab page, and the capitalized version clearly predominates.
Extraordinary Writ (
talk) 08:17, 26 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Oppose. The principal topic for this is
last judgement, which should be lower case. Unless there's a proposal to actually redirect lowercase "Day of reckoning" to
last judgement (which isn't somethign that's been proposed here) then it should absolutely stay as it is. —
Amakuru (
talk) 11:06, 26 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Well, our article currently capitalizes
Last Judgment, doesn't it? (Arguably it should be lowercased per
MOS:CAPS, but that's a question for another time.)
Extraordinary Writ (
talk) 21:02, 26 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Wheter we should capitalise the article
Last Judgment is debatable given the ngram evidence and that there are several works by this name that would normally be capitalised. None of the other bolded terms at the article would appear to satisfy the need to cap per
MOS:CAPS. There are inconsistencies that should probably be considered in respect to the primary topic that should be resolved, since the capitalisation of the primary topic directly relates to this discussion. Perhaps we should close this discussion (one way or the other) without prejudice to revisiting the matter once issues of capitalisation in the primary topic have been addressed.
Cinderella157 (
talk) 13:04, 5 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Support, per nom, every entry on the page is uppercased.
Randy Kryn (
talk) 07:58, 4 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
Shwcz (
talk) 12:25, 5 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Oppose per Cinderella157 and Amakuru. The primary topic is something we do not capitalize per
MOS:DOCTCAPS; all the works in the list are derivative uses, and are capitalized because they are titles of works. —
SMcCandlish☏¢ 😼 07:33, 6 December 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.