This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all
disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
valid DAB content
All of these things are valid on a DAB page as having a common title (in this case "Darker"):
Do you know how incredibly anal and stupid this is? Having to create a separate list just for things with "darker" in their titles is just idiotic and moronic. ∞
ΣɛÞ²(
τ|
c)13:21, 31 May 2007 (UTC)reply
The eventual point is that having a list of things with "darker" in their titles is unneeded. A separate article should not be created; it's not encyclopedic. Enter "darker" in the search box and hit "Search" instead of "Go" to get
this list or use a Google search "site:en.wikipedia.org intitle:darker"
like this. And, again, be civil. --
JHunterJ13:33, 31 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Wrong. "Darker" in a search doesn't yield all articles with "darker" in their titles in a quick and concise way as a
list does and is as encylcopedic as any other list. Be civil yourself, and stop harrassing me about these basic common sense-issue things. Looks like I need to bring
Wikipedia:WikiProject Lists into this growing debate... ∞
ΣɛÞ²(
τ|
c)15:31, 31 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Being opposed when you edit counter to established consensus isn't harassment. Keep in mind that disambiguation pages aren't list articles, and vice versa. See also "List of phrases including breaking"'s
deletion log. --
JHunterJ15:51, 31 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Especially considering many other disambiguation pages have lists of articles with a single word in their name, such as on
Palmer. ∞
ΣɛÞ²(
τ|
c)06:51, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Other dabs varying unintentionally from the guidelines don't mean that all dabs may. I've edited
Palmer to bring it more into line. If there are others, you can alert me on my talk page or change the {{disambig}} to {{disambig-cleanup}}. --
JHunterJ11:11, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all
disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
valid DAB content
All of these things are valid on a DAB page as having a common title (in this case "Darker"):
Do you know how incredibly anal and stupid this is? Having to create a separate list just for things with "darker" in their titles is just idiotic and moronic. ∞
ΣɛÞ²(
τ|
c)13:21, 31 May 2007 (UTC)reply
The eventual point is that having a list of things with "darker" in their titles is unneeded. A separate article should not be created; it's not encyclopedic. Enter "darker" in the search box and hit "Search" instead of "Go" to get
this list or use a Google search "site:en.wikipedia.org intitle:darker"
like this. And, again, be civil. --
JHunterJ13:33, 31 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Wrong. "Darker" in a search doesn't yield all articles with "darker" in their titles in a quick and concise way as a
list does and is as encylcopedic as any other list. Be civil yourself, and stop harrassing me about these basic common sense-issue things. Looks like I need to bring
Wikipedia:WikiProject Lists into this growing debate... ∞
ΣɛÞ²(
τ|
c)15:31, 31 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Being opposed when you edit counter to established consensus isn't harassment. Keep in mind that disambiguation pages aren't list articles, and vice versa. See also "List of phrases including breaking"'s
deletion log. --
JHunterJ15:51, 31 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Especially considering many other disambiguation pages have lists of articles with a single word in their name, such as on
Palmer. ∞
ΣɛÞ²(
τ|
c)06:51, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Other dabs varying unintentionally from the guidelines don't mean that all dabs may. I've edited
Palmer to bring it more into line. If there are others, you can alert me on my talk page or change the {{disambig}} to {{disambig-cleanup}}. --
JHunterJ11:11, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply