![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 23 September 2015. The result of the discussion was keep. |
I reverted the infobox seen here, which was reminiscent of the infobox that was used when this article was nominated for deletion, seen here. While the {{ Infobox character}} template exists, most of the fields are in-universe, and this character's notability is not widespread enough to warrant using these fields. What I implemented instead was a variation of the infobox at Featured Article Jason Voorhees that was done by Bignole, which I believe is appropriately simple. Erik ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 14:48, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
I find the recently-revised infobox here to be too in-universe compared to the version that focuses on real-world context (as seen here). Pinging editors from AfD discussion: Mww113, Slashme, Doniago -- what do you think? Erik ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 15:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Pinging 5.224.19.8 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) as well. Erik ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 15:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
I've reverted the same kind of infobox again that has too much indiscriminate detail; it can be seen here. As previously mentioned, the current infobox is based on the one from Featured Article Jasoon Voorhees, which I find to be appropriately focused on real-world context, which is necessary in Wikipedia's treatment of fictional topics. Erik ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 19:24, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Grapesoda22, it is bizarre of you to add an "in-universe" template when you are trying to perpetuate an in-universe take of the article. As said above, the high-quality infobox is taken from the Featured Article Jason Voorhees by Bignole, and Slashme concurred with the use of this infobox. Erik ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 18:20, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
@ Erik:, There! Nothing in universe! Grapesoda22 ( ✉) 18:27, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for pinging me into the discussion. My opinion, for what it's worth:
I'm happy with this version. This version is also OK, but the word "fictional" should be removed from the headings: the word "fictional" isn't a magic wand that fixes "in-universe" descriptions, and in the context of the current state of the article, it's not needed in the infobox. This version of the infobox is way too much, though. -- Slashme ( talk) 07:44, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
The Optimistic One wants to change this article's infobox to include more in-universe information, such as occupation schoolboy, religion Christian, and nationality American. Their version can be found here. I find the status-quo version here to have all the important information needed. The other details are grossly unnecessary. What do other editors think? Pinging Slashme, Grapesoda22, Bignole from last discussion. Erik ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 18:24, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
This is what I meant:
Danny Torrence | |
---|---|
The Shining character | |
File:Danny Torrance in The Shining film.jpg
Danny Lloyd as Danny Torrence in
The Shining in 1980. | |
First appearance |
|
Last appearance |
|
Created by | Stephen King |
Portrayed by | |
In-universe information | |
Relatives |
Jack Torrence Abra Stone |
Powers and Abilities |
Psychic powers Been able to see ghosts |
The only reason I don't have Ewan in this is because he technically hasn't appeared as Danny Torrence. He's filming the part, but this indicates he's made an appearance, which is not true (yet). BIGNOLE (Contact me) 16:05, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 23 September 2015. The result of the discussion was keep. |
I reverted the infobox seen here, which was reminiscent of the infobox that was used when this article was nominated for deletion, seen here. While the {{ Infobox character}} template exists, most of the fields are in-universe, and this character's notability is not widespread enough to warrant using these fields. What I implemented instead was a variation of the infobox at Featured Article Jason Voorhees that was done by Bignole, which I believe is appropriately simple. Erik ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 14:48, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
I find the recently-revised infobox here to be too in-universe compared to the version that focuses on real-world context (as seen here). Pinging editors from AfD discussion: Mww113, Slashme, Doniago -- what do you think? Erik ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 15:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Pinging 5.224.19.8 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) as well. Erik ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 15:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
I've reverted the same kind of infobox again that has too much indiscriminate detail; it can be seen here. As previously mentioned, the current infobox is based on the one from Featured Article Jasoon Voorhees, which I find to be appropriately focused on real-world context, which is necessary in Wikipedia's treatment of fictional topics. Erik ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 19:24, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Grapesoda22, it is bizarre of you to add an "in-universe" template when you are trying to perpetuate an in-universe take of the article. As said above, the high-quality infobox is taken from the Featured Article Jason Voorhees by Bignole, and Slashme concurred with the use of this infobox. Erik ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 18:20, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
@ Erik:, There! Nothing in universe! Grapesoda22 ( ✉) 18:27, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for pinging me into the discussion. My opinion, for what it's worth:
I'm happy with this version. This version is also OK, but the word "fictional" should be removed from the headings: the word "fictional" isn't a magic wand that fixes "in-universe" descriptions, and in the context of the current state of the article, it's not needed in the infobox. This version of the infobox is way too much, though. -- Slashme ( talk) 07:44, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
The Optimistic One wants to change this article's infobox to include more in-universe information, such as occupation schoolboy, religion Christian, and nationality American. Their version can be found here. I find the status-quo version here to have all the important information needed. The other details are grossly unnecessary. What do other editors think? Pinging Slashme, Grapesoda22, Bignole from last discussion. Erik ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 18:24, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
This is what I meant:
Danny Torrence | |
---|---|
The Shining character | |
File:Danny Torrance in The Shining film.jpg
Danny Lloyd as Danny Torrence in
The Shining in 1980. | |
First appearance |
|
Last appearance |
|
Created by | Stephen King |
Portrayed by | |
In-universe information | |
Relatives |
Jack Torrence Abra Stone |
Powers and Abilities |
Psychic powers Been able to see ghosts |
The only reason I don't have Ewan in this is because he technically hasn't appeared as Danny Torrence. He's filming the part, but this indicates he's made an appearance, which is not true (yet). BIGNOLE (Contact me) 16:05, 7 December 2018 (UTC)