![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
I have archived the talk page, as it was incredibly long and had comments dating back to 2003. I believe, for the most part, I did it right (it was my first time doing this), but if you know of a better way, please feel free to modify as necessary. Anakinjmt 02:52, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Daniel did not do the voice over of Harry for the fifth Harry Potter game. He was busy doing Equus. Adam Sapp did Harry's voice in the game. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.191.171.66 ( talk) 02:07, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Read on a newspaper, Paparazzi section and I've found an article about a breakup between Radcliffe and another British actress, Laura O'Toole about 4 years older then him. I am very surprised that despite that being highly publicized in the UK (and also the US) there is no mention about the relationship even I've several TV reports on questioning about Radcliffe and relationships and stuff like that. I guess maybe part because O'Toole, despite playing on Equus (so as Radcliffe), doesn't have an article. But should it be mentionned in this article since most relations involving celebrities when being actor or whatever are mentionned. I've only seen a few weeks ago about being a rumor, but apparently there was a relationship between the two British actors.-- JForget 23:50, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Checking up Google typing Radcliffe O'Toole, gave me this as first source and it's about their split.-- JForget 00:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
I've added mention of it with a source, apparently they never made it public although there were rumours/reports since November 2007. Actually, there are numerous articles (okay probably some of them are copy and paste from the same news agency via several sites). One of the articles also mentions a relation between Hermione ( Emma Watson) and rugby star Tom Ducker (although the latter doesn't even had an article too JForget 18:02, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
It makes zero difference how many sources are linked to for such a piece of information - the info itself is the stuff of gossip columns, so it would never belong in a proper encyclopaedia entry. Including this trivial info adds no value. If anything, it reduces this 'Daniel Radcliffe' page as a pathetic joke of an encyclopaedia entry. Daniloc ( talk) 01:57, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm wondering if the kiss he received from presenter James Corden when accepting his Whatsonstage award is notable enough to be included. There has been a lot of talk about it, particularly with the fact that he seemed to be nearly attacked with it or rather if it was planned as a publicity stunt. [1]
His representative said that Radcliffe wasn't embarrassed, saying, "It was a spontaneous gesture that was very funny. Daniel took it in the light-hearted spirit it was intended." [2]
He also bought another apartment in New York for USD$4.9 million. More information about it in the reference. [3]
James Ryan ( talk) 23:46, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Contributors really need to understand what is typically included in a biographical entry in an encyclopaedia. I'm afraid that excludes a lot of trivial information that would be found on fan websites or blogs, and the tabloids. As it is, there's too much of that stuff already, threatening to debase Wikipedia into Wikinquirer. Please don't add any more. Daniloc ( talk) 20:55, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Regarding the placement of mentioning his real estate purchases directly after a quote about his not being extravagant... this seems unfair to me, because it appears to infer that he was actually extravagant after saying he would not be. But he purchased a place in Manhattan to live in while he worked there. The sources regarding both real estate purchases indicate that he purchased one as an income property and a second one as a residence while he was working nearby, which is perfectly reasonable and not at all uncommon for a working actor with his income. There are far more expensive places in Manhattan he could have purchased if he really wanted to be extravagant, as it is one of the most expensive cities in the world. I would like to see this adjusted to be more fair and neutral than it currently is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.54.250.11 ( talk) 00:30, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
The crapola about the bands he likes (which all happen to be crap, which is neither here nor there) is not suitable material for Wikipedia. I really wish all the teeny-boppers would stick to the fanclub websites. You can tell the author wanted to add lots more crapola from Teen Beat, but restrained himself, thank God! Emmetlang ( talk) 20:18, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
hes jewish and it's said that he put on teffilin with the help of classmate then "colev friedman" now a religious student part of the chabad sect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.6.67.14 ( talk) 21:33, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
From Wikipedia:Verifiability ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:V) 'Articles should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy'.
By that standard, information that originates from the following article from thesun.co.uk does not qualify. Not only does that tabloid have no reputation for fact-checking, its reputation is for outright fabrication.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/film/article924465.ece
24.86.253.211 ( talk) 23:29, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
More generally, the Murdoch Sun has been criticised since its launch for its sensationalism, which on occasion has led it to publish stories on the most spurious evidence, and for its focus on celebrities for its news and feature coverage. It has regularly been accused of appealing to the lowest common denominator and dumbing down public discourse.
I disagree. If you look at the archived talk page here, you will also find under 'Equus' another discussion where tabloid as source was considered inadequate for reliability.
Beyond that, thesun.co.uk had also reported Radcliffe was under such a serious threat that he was under guard by ex-SAS agents, and yet within two weeks they also published the article about his smoking habit which included the detail of him smoking more because he's out and about with smokers Stephen Fry and Kevin Spacey. Not even bothering to explain the contradiction that he is so seriously threatened, yet he's out on the town, they also reported within the same period that Radcliffe requested the ex-SAS agents guard his dogs - even for The Sun, so obviously outlandish, unless one is gullible enough to believe it isn't an insult to ex-SAS professionals to ask they risk their lives for dogs.
If that sort of reporting doesn't make it apparent that it's silly season at the Sun on Radcliffe, then why bother pretending there are even any standards on what can be included in articles here?
Last point: One would think with a smoking habit like that, there'd be more than one tabloid who can unearth someone willing to talk for a bit of cash. And yet no other like story from any other source.
I'm afraid you're on seriously shaky ground if you're trying to argue the reliability of The Sun.
The nude photo of Dan is a fake. It is real down until about the lower torso. The bottom has been doctored. I have seen the source photo of the bottom as proof, and I can find it if need be. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.217.59.112 ( talk) 15:55, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Definitely NOT WORK SAFE, but here you go, and as you can see, this guy's legs have been chopped off and reversed to be included in Dan's photo: Here —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.217.59.112 ( talk) 14:51, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
A nude photo is somewhat inappropriate on this site, but couldn't we have one where he doesn't have his mouth open like he was talking or something? I agree with Lradrama. 96.242.5.155 ( talk) 15:59, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
As Radcliffe said in an interview that even though he has a Jewish mother, he isn't religious himself, shouldn't he really be take off the Jewish Actors category?
Should we realy have "nude" linked? Pirakafreak24 ( Leave a Message ) I can sing! Ha!. 05:58, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Daniel Radcliffe claims to be an Atheist in this article. [4]
How about we list him as an "Actor of Jewish descent"? That solves the argument. cymru lass (hit me up)⁄ (background check) 02:22, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
what about Radcliffe laying tefillin according to various repoorts online see - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nwLvtmUEdc& and http://www.chabad.info/index.php?url=article_en&id=21317 ? 216.252.82.66 ( talk) 21:16, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
It is not confirmed that he is gay. They are rumors only so far and if it was true, the statement needs to be cited. I do not know how to edit this myself, and would rather not get in a debate as I will not be coming back to this page. Someone please fix this error, it's if anything, unfounded until cited. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.98.160.22 ( talk) 02:36, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
in the Stage and screen credits - films section, it states he played Maps an 18 year old orphan. can someone please correct this, as it's wrong. he states in the film that the orphanage make you leave when you are 18, so therefore he can't be 18, as he's still at the orphanage... i can't change it as the page is locked for some reason. 77.97.110.57 ( talk) 18:18, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
He doesn't actually play bass guitar, read here> [1], someone fix this as i can not. Thakmere ( talk) 02:49, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
"His T-shirt was part of the Tsunami Clothes Auction which raised money for the Rebuilding Sri Lanka Organization. He wore the t-shirt during the making of the film, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. These T-shirts were only issued to members of the cast and crew. His shirt raised £520 or $811.80."
This needs to be cited. You cannot state something as fact without citing it, especially not this. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Shapeshifter309 (
talk •
contribs)
02:03, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
At the request of 75.47.143.222 ( talk · contribs) via a Files For Upload request here, I have uploaded 12 photographs from flickr, and put them here for the consideration of the article editors;
The article mentions that Daniel Radcliffe will play the role of Dan Eldon in 'The Journey is the Destination' (and this news has also been confirmed), but mysteriously, the same film (that was previously mentioned as part of his film credits) has now been removed. Could someone please explain why 'The Journey is the Destination' has been removed from Radcliffe's film credits?? Thanks. 59.184.131.213 ( talk) 14:37, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Because the film is not in production yet. The people who want to make the film approached him, and he expressed interest, but it hasn't gone any farther than that so far; they are still trying to find backers and get the project going, etc. This is a typical situation for small independent film companies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.54.250.11 ( talk) 23:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
{{
editsemiprotected}}
instead of writing Arthor Kipps there is a mistake in the women in the black portion of daniel radcliffe biography. thanks
Mnm447 ( talk) 16:25, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
I don't want the article about Daniel Radcliffe to sound like a trivia section, mentioning every tiny detail about his life. But shouldn't there be at least a mention of his biggest influences as far as acting is concerned? He seems to mention (fellow Potter co-star) Gary Oldman quite frequently in interviews. [2] "...of course I was glad that (Sirius Black's role) went to Gary Oldman, because as you all know he's my true love." [3]
Would it be fair to say that Gary Oldman has probably had the biggest influence on Radcliffe's career? [4] [5] [6]
Thanks. 59.184.179.203 ( talk) 04:19, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
On November 7 2010 Daniel Radcliffe was "Edmund" in this years Treehouse Of Horror on The Simpsons. The section of the episode is called "Tweenlight". If someone could please add that to the article (I would but I dont know how =P) Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.123.253.226 ( talk) 05:21, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Adding height to the article will improve wikipedia, a lot of people search for actor's height, and wikipedia is a nice place to get this information from.
Height is a parameter of body, nothing offensive and etc., it's a FACT that he has this height.
Move back Edited-Changes about his height. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.118.228.2 ( talk) 08:05, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
His height is not noteworthy or relevant to his notability.--
Bbb23 (
talk)
14:06, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Monkeymanman ( talk) 21:42, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Reviewer:
Artoasis (
talk)
13:58, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Artoasis ( talk) 14:48, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
The article has indeed improved a lot from the last time. Nice work. I only sampled the lead section, and will do some copyediting shortly. I plan to deliver my verdict this weekend after a more thorough check. Cheers.-- Artoasis ( talk) 14:48, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
In a newspaper I read that he is gay. Should be mentioned in the main article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.0.92.40 ( talk) 22:23, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Hate to be picky, but could a more recent/latest picture of Daniel Radcliffe be used in the info box (from the London/NY 'Deathly Hallows Part 2' premieres, dated July 2011)? The picture in use is from November 2010. Nothing wrong with the present picture, but the July 2011 picture would be the latest one (not to mention, on Rupert Grint's page, a picture from July 2011 is actually present in the info box).
Thanks. 59.184.179.134 ( talk) 12:34, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Yates radcliffe.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions
|
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 10:47, 5 August 2011 (UTC) |
The wikipedia articles on Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint and Emma Watson state that they were age 11, 11 and 9 respectively when cast as their "Harry Potter" characters. Based on the birthdays given in each article a spread sheet will show that at no time are they so aged at the same time. A minor discrepancy but still an error which should be easliy corrected. Jack Bradley (Redacted) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.139.120.254 ( talk) 20:05, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi
During the copyedit a few things came to light that may need addressing:
I have completed a first run, though I will attempt another later tonight to catch any missed items. Chaosdruid ( talk) 17:14, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
@Bbb23 - 1. please read my previous note "eyeglass..." above. Moreover the wikipage is titled "Glasses" and I linked it to differentiate between glasses, the things you drink out of, and glasses, the things you wear to see better with. 2. The comma separates them as they are not really linked-sentence parts. One relates to his religious beliefs, atheist, and one to his heritage, Jewish descent. The Jewish part in that sentence is not referring to his religion as he is an atheist.
Chaosdruid (
talk)
16:11, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Daniel Radcliffe has been nominated for a Grammy Award in the category of 'Best Musical Theater Cast Album', for his Broadway play 'How To Succeed in Business Without Really Trying.' The official nomination credit reads as follows: How to Succeed in Business Without Really Trying (Decca): John Larroquette & Daniel Radcliffe, principal soloists; Robert Sher, producer [7]
Could someone please add the above information to his page? Thanks. 59.184.166.37 ( talk) 19:04, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
I have archived the talk page, as it was incredibly long and had comments dating back to 2003. I believe, for the most part, I did it right (it was my first time doing this), but if you know of a better way, please feel free to modify as necessary. Anakinjmt 02:52, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Daniel did not do the voice over of Harry for the fifth Harry Potter game. He was busy doing Equus. Adam Sapp did Harry's voice in the game. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.191.171.66 ( talk) 02:07, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Read on a newspaper, Paparazzi section and I've found an article about a breakup between Radcliffe and another British actress, Laura O'Toole about 4 years older then him. I am very surprised that despite that being highly publicized in the UK (and also the US) there is no mention about the relationship even I've several TV reports on questioning about Radcliffe and relationships and stuff like that. I guess maybe part because O'Toole, despite playing on Equus (so as Radcliffe), doesn't have an article. But should it be mentionned in this article since most relations involving celebrities when being actor or whatever are mentionned. I've only seen a few weeks ago about being a rumor, but apparently there was a relationship between the two British actors.-- JForget 23:50, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Checking up Google typing Radcliffe O'Toole, gave me this as first source and it's about their split.-- JForget 00:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
I've added mention of it with a source, apparently they never made it public although there were rumours/reports since November 2007. Actually, there are numerous articles (okay probably some of them are copy and paste from the same news agency via several sites). One of the articles also mentions a relation between Hermione ( Emma Watson) and rugby star Tom Ducker (although the latter doesn't even had an article too JForget 18:02, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
It makes zero difference how many sources are linked to for such a piece of information - the info itself is the stuff of gossip columns, so it would never belong in a proper encyclopaedia entry. Including this trivial info adds no value. If anything, it reduces this 'Daniel Radcliffe' page as a pathetic joke of an encyclopaedia entry. Daniloc ( talk) 01:57, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm wondering if the kiss he received from presenter James Corden when accepting his Whatsonstage award is notable enough to be included. There has been a lot of talk about it, particularly with the fact that he seemed to be nearly attacked with it or rather if it was planned as a publicity stunt. [1]
His representative said that Radcliffe wasn't embarrassed, saying, "It was a spontaneous gesture that was very funny. Daniel took it in the light-hearted spirit it was intended." [2]
He also bought another apartment in New York for USD$4.9 million. More information about it in the reference. [3]
James Ryan ( talk) 23:46, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Contributors really need to understand what is typically included in a biographical entry in an encyclopaedia. I'm afraid that excludes a lot of trivial information that would be found on fan websites or blogs, and the tabloids. As it is, there's too much of that stuff already, threatening to debase Wikipedia into Wikinquirer. Please don't add any more. Daniloc ( talk) 20:55, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Regarding the placement of mentioning his real estate purchases directly after a quote about his not being extravagant... this seems unfair to me, because it appears to infer that he was actually extravagant after saying he would not be. But he purchased a place in Manhattan to live in while he worked there. The sources regarding both real estate purchases indicate that he purchased one as an income property and a second one as a residence while he was working nearby, which is perfectly reasonable and not at all uncommon for a working actor with his income. There are far more expensive places in Manhattan he could have purchased if he really wanted to be extravagant, as it is one of the most expensive cities in the world. I would like to see this adjusted to be more fair and neutral than it currently is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.54.250.11 ( talk) 00:30, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
The crapola about the bands he likes (which all happen to be crap, which is neither here nor there) is not suitable material for Wikipedia. I really wish all the teeny-boppers would stick to the fanclub websites. You can tell the author wanted to add lots more crapola from Teen Beat, but restrained himself, thank God! Emmetlang ( talk) 20:18, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
hes jewish and it's said that he put on teffilin with the help of classmate then "colev friedman" now a religious student part of the chabad sect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.6.67.14 ( talk) 21:33, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
From Wikipedia:Verifiability ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:V) 'Articles should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy'.
By that standard, information that originates from the following article from thesun.co.uk does not qualify. Not only does that tabloid have no reputation for fact-checking, its reputation is for outright fabrication.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/film/article924465.ece
24.86.253.211 ( talk) 23:29, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
More generally, the Murdoch Sun has been criticised since its launch for its sensationalism, which on occasion has led it to publish stories on the most spurious evidence, and for its focus on celebrities for its news and feature coverage. It has regularly been accused of appealing to the lowest common denominator and dumbing down public discourse.
I disagree. If you look at the archived talk page here, you will also find under 'Equus' another discussion where tabloid as source was considered inadequate for reliability.
Beyond that, thesun.co.uk had also reported Radcliffe was under such a serious threat that he was under guard by ex-SAS agents, and yet within two weeks they also published the article about his smoking habit which included the detail of him smoking more because he's out and about with smokers Stephen Fry and Kevin Spacey. Not even bothering to explain the contradiction that he is so seriously threatened, yet he's out on the town, they also reported within the same period that Radcliffe requested the ex-SAS agents guard his dogs - even for The Sun, so obviously outlandish, unless one is gullible enough to believe it isn't an insult to ex-SAS professionals to ask they risk their lives for dogs.
If that sort of reporting doesn't make it apparent that it's silly season at the Sun on Radcliffe, then why bother pretending there are even any standards on what can be included in articles here?
Last point: One would think with a smoking habit like that, there'd be more than one tabloid who can unearth someone willing to talk for a bit of cash. And yet no other like story from any other source.
I'm afraid you're on seriously shaky ground if you're trying to argue the reliability of The Sun.
The nude photo of Dan is a fake. It is real down until about the lower torso. The bottom has been doctored. I have seen the source photo of the bottom as proof, and I can find it if need be. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.217.59.112 ( talk) 15:55, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Definitely NOT WORK SAFE, but here you go, and as you can see, this guy's legs have been chopped off and reversed to be included in Dan's photo: Here —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.217.59.112 ( talk) 14:51, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
A nude photo is somewhat inappropriate on this site, but couldn't we have one where he doesn't have his mouth open like he was talking or something? I agree with Lradrama. 96.242.5.155 ( talk) 15:59, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
As Radcliffe said in an interview that even though he has a Jewish mother, he isn't religious himself, shouldn't he really be take off the Jewish Actors category?
Should we realy have "nude" linked? Pirakafreak24 ( Leave a Message ) I can sing! Ha!. 05:58, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Daniel Radcliffe claims to be an Atheist in this article. [4]
How about we list him as an "Actor of Jewish descent"? That solves the argument. cymru lass (hit me up)⁄ (background check) 02:22, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
what about Radcliffe laying tefillin according to various repoorts online see - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nwLvtmUEdc& and http://www.chabad.info/index.php?url=article_en&id=21317 ? 216.252.82.66 ( talk) 21:16, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
It is not confirmed that he is gay. They are rumors only so far and if it was true, the statement needs to be cited. I do not know how to edit this myself, and would rather not get in a debate as I will not be coming back to this page. Someone please fix this error, it's if anything, unfounded until cited. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.98.160.22 ( talk) 02:36, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
in the Stage and screen credits - films section, it states he played Maps an 18 year old orphan. can someone please correct this, as it's wrong. he states in the film that the orphanage make you leave when you are 18, so therefore he can't be 18, as he's still at the orphanage... i can't change it as the page is locked for some reason. 77.97.110.57 ( talk) 18:18, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
He doesn't actually play bass guitar, read here> [1], someone fix this as i can not. Thakmere ( talk) 02:49, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
"His T-shirt was part of the Tsunami Clothes Auction which raised money for the Rebuilding Sri Lanka Organization. He wore the t-shirt during the making of the film, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. These T-shirts were only issued to members of the cast and crew. His shirt raised £520 or $811.80."
This needs to be cited. You cannot state something as fact without citing it, especially not this. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Shapeshifter309 (
talk •
contribs)
02:03, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
At the request of 75.47.143.222 ( talk · contribs) via a Files For Upload request here, I have uploaded 12 photographs from flickr, and put them here for the consideration of the article editors;
The article mentions that Daniel Radcliffe will play the role of Dan Eldon in 'The Journey is the Destination' (and this news has also been confirmed), but mysteriously, the same film (that was previously mentioned as part of his film credits) has now been removed. Could someone please explain why 'The Journey is the Destination' has been removed from Radcliffe's film credits?? Thanks. 59.184.131.213 ( talk) 14:37, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Because the film is not in production yet. The people who want to make the film approached him, and he expressed interest, but it hasn't gone any farther than that so far; they are still trying to find backers and get the project going, etc. This is a typical situation for small independent film companies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.54.250.11 ( talk) 23:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
{{
editsemiprotected}}
instead of writing Arthor Kipps there is a mistake in the women in the black portion of daniel radcliffe biography. thanks
Mnm447 ( talk) 16:25, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
I don't want the article about Daniel Radcliffe to sound like a trivia section, mentioning every tiny detail about his life. But shouldn't there be at least a mention of his biggest influences as far as acting is concerned? He seems to mention (fellow Potter co-star) Gary Oldman quite frequently in interviews. [2] "...of course I was glad that (Sirius Black's role) went to Gary Oldman, because as you all know he's my true love." [3]
Would it be fair to say that Gary Oldman has probably had the biggest influence on Radcliffe's career? [4] [5] [6]
Thanks. 59.184.179.203 ( talk) 04:19, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
On November 7 2010 Daniel Radcliffe was "Edmund" in this years Treehouse Of Horror on The Simpsons. The section of the episode is called "Tweenlight". If someone could please add that to the article (I would but I dont know how =P) Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.123.253.226 ( talk) 05:21, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Adding height to the article will improve wikipedia, a lot of people search for actor's height, and wikipedia is a nice place to get this information from.
Height is a parameter of body, nothing offensive and etc., it's a FACT that he has this height.
Move back Edited-Changes about his height. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.118.228.2 ( talk) 08:05, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
His height is not noteworthy or relevant to his notability.--
Bbb23 (
talk)
14:06, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Monkeymanman ( talk) 21:42, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Reviewer:
Artoasis (
talk)
13:58, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Artoasis ( talk) 14:48, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
The article has indeed improved a lot from the last time. Nice work. I only sampled the lead section, and will do some copyediting shortly. I plan to deliver my verdict this weekend after a more thorough check. Cheers.-- Artoasis ( talk) 14:48, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
In a newspaper I read that he is gay. Should be mentioned in the main article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.0.92.40 ( talk) 22:23, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Hate to be picky, but could a more recent/latest picture of Daniel Radcliffe be used in the info box (from the London/NY 'Deathly Hallows Part 2' premieres, dated July 2011)? The picture in use is from November 2010. Nothing wrong with the present picture, but the July 2011 picture would be the latest one (not to mention, on Rupert Grint's page, a picture from July 2011 is actually present in the info box).
Thanks. 59.184.179.134 ( talk) 12:34, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Yates radcliffe.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions
|
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 10:47, 5 August 2011 (UTC) |
The wikipedia articles on Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint and Emma Watson state that they were age 11, 11 and 9 respectively when cast as their "Harry Potter" characters. Based on the birthdays given in each article a spread sheet will show that at no time are they so aged at the same time. A minor discrepancy but still an error which should be easliy corrected. Jack Bradley (Redacted) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.139.120.254 ( talk) 20:05, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi
During the copyedit a few things came to light that may need addressing:
I have completed a first run, though I will attempt another later tonight to catch any missed items. Chaosdruid ( talk) 17:14, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
@Bbb23 - 1. please read my previous note "eyeglass..." above. Moreover the wikipage is titled "Glasses" and I linked it to differentiate between glasses, the things you drink out of, and glasses, the things you wear to see better with. 2. The comma separates them as they are not really linked-sentence parts. One relates to his religious beliefs, atheist, and one to his heritage, Jewish descent. The Jewish part in that sentence is not referring to his religion as he is an atheist.
Chaosdruid (
talk)
16:11, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Daniel Radcliffe has been nominated for a Grammy Award in the category of 'Best Musical Theater Cast Album', for his Broadway play 'How To Succeed in Business Without Really Trying.' The official nomination credit reads as follows: How to Succeed in Business Without Really Trying (Decca): John Larroquette & Daniel Radcliffe, principal soloists; Robert Sher, producer [7]
Could someone please add the above information to his page? Thanks. 59.184.166.37 ( talk) 19:04, 1 December 2011 (UTC)