This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Daniel David article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I was one of poeple who participated in the elaboration of this article. I guess that all the information offered are verified and verifiable. I will explore egain the artcile to check that all info. is verified and balanced.
Alin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.196.151.33 ( talk • contribs)
Considered by his peers a beautiful mind and a brilliant person, his research work was prized by major figures in the field. Thus, Dr. Albert Ellis said that "...his research work is a gem and it speaks about a young genius..." and Dr. Aaron T. Beck said that "...I do consider him one of the most knowledgeable people in regard to the basic cognitive science underlying cognitive therapy..."
I think you are correct. I was not the author of that text (maybe many people contributed); however, I after reading them, I have checked and found some of those references on the website (eg. at www.psychotherapy.ro); so, although they seem correct I agree it is too positive (for a living person!). It is good you took them out. However, the other comments seem correct and verifiable in my view.
Alin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.196.151.33 ( talk • contribs)
I am sorry; I have posted that part of the text based on the reccomendations I found on the internet (serious ones see at www.psychotherapy.ro) and based on those presentations I attended myself when Dr. David was awarded various awards by his peers. However, I was not aware about the neutrality issue and indeed, the text is biased towards positive. So, I agree to delete that part of the text. (Mircea, Turda). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.79.125.134 ( talk • contribs)
Well, the article seems balanced to me in this form. (Cosmin) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.231.19.85 ( talk • contribs)
Interesting article and discussions. I did not know about the "Wikipedia" and but it is fun and useful (I guess). I know Daniel from various conferences (I am an assistant professor myself). He is like a magnet to people that is why he is so positively regarded. Just for curiosity, I have check the info. in professional sources and most of it is correct. Because he is not a magent to me (I think!) I have tempered to tone of the text and I have deleted all info. based on paraprofessional rather than professional sources. Based on this, I think it is correct to take out the tag (I will do it). If you do not agree with my actions (e.g., taking out some info., tempering the tone, taking out the tag) please let me know the reason and let us discuss (Dr. Ardelean Florin). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.123.87.200 ( talk • contribs)
Let me tell where I found some of the info. Ad-Astra ( http://www.ad-astra.ro/cartea-alba/authors.php?order=n_articles&domain_id=150) The other sources can be found in his presentation in various books of him made by the publishers ( http://www.polirom.ro/cauta.cgi?action=cauta&class=search&autor=David) I guess that those who wrote the articles could post the references in the article. Dr. Ardelean.
To Dr. Ardelean: why did you take out the text related to the Thomsom ISI? To the moderator: as one of the authors I have put the references. (Alin)
I have made changes that point to a more objective point of view and I have added references to sustain the statements in the text. I have removed the POV label (Silviu Matu)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Daniel David. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:28, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 10:22, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Daniel David article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I was one of poeple who participated in the elaboration of this article. I guess that all the information offered are verified and verifiable. I will explore egain the artcile to check that all info. is verified and balanced.
Alin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.196.151.33 ( talk • contribs)
Considered by his peers a beautiful mind and a brilliant person, his research work was prized by major figures in the field. Thus, Dr. Albert Ellis said that "...his research work is a gem and it speaks about a young genius..." and Dr. Aaron T. Beck said that "...I do consider him one of the most knowledgeable people in regard to the basic cognitive science underlying cognitive therapy..."
I think you are correct. I was not the author of that text (maybe many people contributed); however, I after reading them, I have checked and found some of those references on the website (eg. at www.psychotherapy.ro); so, although they seem correct I agree it is too positive (for a living person!). It is good you took them out. However, the other comments seem correct and verifiable in my view.
Alin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.196.151.33 ( talk • contribs)
I am sorry; I have posted that part of the text based on the reccomendations I found on the internet (serious ones see at www.psychotherapy.ro) and based on those presentations I attended myself when Dr. David was awarded various awards by his peers. However, I was not aware about the neutrality issue and indeed, the text is biased towards positive. So, I agree to delete that part of the text. (Mircea, Turda). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.79.125.134 ( talk • contribs)
Well, the article seems balanced to me in this form. (Cosmin) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.231.19.85 ( talk • contribs)
Interesting article and discussions. I did not know about the "Wikipedia" and but it is fun and useful (I guess). I know Daniel from various conferences (I am an assistant professor myself). He is like a magnet to people that is why he is so positively regarded. Just for curiosity, I have check the info. in professional sources and most of it is correct. Because he is not a magent to me (I think!) I have tempered to tone of the text and I have deleted all info. based on paraprofessional rather than professional sources. Based on this, I think it is correct to take out the tag (I will do it). If you do not agree with my actions (e.g., taking out some info., tempering the tone, taking out the tag) please let me know the reason and let us discuss (Dr. Ardelean Florin). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.123.87.200 ( talk • contribs)
Let me tell where I found some of the info. Ad-Astra ( http://www.ad-astra.ro/cartea-alba/authors.php?order=n_articles&domain_id=150) The other sources can be found in his presentation in various books of him made by the publishers ( http://www.polirom.ro/cauta.cgi?action=cauta&class=search&autor=David) I guess that those who wrote the articles could post the references in the article. Dr. Ardelean.
To Dr. Ardelean: why did you take out the text related to the Thomsom ISI? To the moderator: as one of the authors I have put the references. (Alin)
I have made changes that point to a more objective point of view and I have added references to sustain the statements in the text. I have removed the POV label (Silviu Matu)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Daniel David. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:28, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 10:22, 13 July 2020 (UTC)