This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
food and
drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review
WP:Trivia and
WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects,
select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Dalgety plc is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
New Zealand and
New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
I have just modified 2 external links on
Dalgety plc. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
@
The Drover's Wife: I am unable to understand your difficulties. Please take more room and explain them properly here. Thanks,
Eddaido (
talk) 11:34, 19 July 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Eddaido: This issue arose because I deleted a sentence: "then, in an apparent about-face, for a tenth of the sum bought the largest stockyards in Europe at
Banbury. The stockyard was sold off in 1976." This sentence is unsourced and makes no sense:
An "about face" over what? Why was it an about face?
A reversal of new policy
Prima facie, it was two acquisitions in a row, not a reversal of policy.
Dormskirk (
talk) 09:39, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Yes?? Is that not a little shallow?
A tenth of what sum? (No sum is given in the first place.)
A minor purchase compared with the malt but still the largest stockyard in Europe
This remains meaningless without knowing the original sum.
Dormskirk (
talk) 09:39, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Meaningless to you.
What was this large stockyard in Banbury? (the fact that it was the largest in Europe is unsourced).
The fact that it was sold off in 1976 is also unsourced.
Look elsewhere in edit summaries about over-sourcing
We need to observe guidelines such as
WP:CITE and
WP:RS not edit summaries.
Dormskirk (
talk) 09:39, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Yes, omitted because they would all have clogged the system. Where do you imagine I got the info?
It seems to me to make perfect sense. I do not see how either of you have your difficulties. I try to write in English, if I've done wrong tell me where and don't be so subjective. Thanks,
Eddaido (
talk) 09:10, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Please see my comments above.
Dormskirk (
talk) 09:39, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
And now see my responses.
Eddaido (
talk) 09:43, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
I'll happily take on a bullying old sandgroper but the background to this is that I wrote this article because the subject needed to be covered. i.e. Australasia's stock and station agents and it was followed quickly by kind comment from you. When finished I could say I tried to do one stock and station agent in depth. You are welcome to refine anything about the article but when you seem to make a mistake or two as above I will continue to point it out. You decide what you want to do, I will query it if I see a need to. I hope that is comprehendible. Regards,
Eddaido (
talk) 09:52, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Dormskirk: I know just what I meant when I wrote (whatever) and it still means the same to me x years later. Doesn't mean everyone else grasps what I intended. I think you should make the changes you see necessary and we can discuss them if it turns out we disagree.
Eddaido (
talk) 05:32, 31 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Dormskirk told you very clearly where you went wrong, and the above responses explain nothing (or are simply misguided, such as the defence of unreferenced claims) and are profoundly unhelpful.
The Drover's Wife (
talk) 10:19, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
food and
drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review
WP:Trivia and
WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects,
select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Dalgety plc is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
New Zealand and
New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
I have just modified 2 external links on
Dalgety plc. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
@
The Drover's Wife: I am unable to understand your difficulties. Please take more room and explain them properly here. Thanks,
Eddaido (
talk) 11:34, 19 July 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Eddaido: This issue arose because I deleted a sentence: "then, in an apparent about-face, for a tenth of the sum bought the largest stockyards in Europe at
Banbury. The stockyard was sold off in 1976." This sentence is unsourced and makes no sense:
An "about face" over what? Why was it an about face?
A reversal of new policy
Prima facie, it was two acquisitions in a row, not a reversal of policy.
Dormskirk (
talk) 09:39, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Yes?? Is that not a little shallow?
A tenth of what sum? (No sum is given in the first place.)
A minor purchase compared with the malt but still the largest stockyard in Europe
This remains meaningless without knowing the original sum.
Dormskirk (
talk) 09:39, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Meaningless to you.
What was this large stockyard in Banbury? (the fact that it was the largest in Europe is unsourced).
The fact that it was sold off in 1976 is also unsourced.
Look elsewhere in edit summaries about over-sourcing
We need to observe guidelines such as
WP:CITE and
WP:RS not edit summaries.
Dormskirk (
talk) 09:39, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Yes, omitted because they would all have clogged the system. Where do you imagine I got the info?
It seems to me to make perfect sense. I do not see how either of you have your difficulties. I try to write in English, if I've done wrong tell me where and don't be so subjective. Thanks,
Eddaido (
talk) 09:10, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Please see my comments above.
Dormskirk (
talk) 09:39, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
And now see my responses.
Eddaido (
talk) 09:43, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
I'll happily take on a bullying old sandgroper but the background to this is that I wrote this article because the subject needed to be covered. i.e. Australasia's stock and station agents and it was followed quickly by kind comment from you. When finished I could say I tried to do one stock and station agent in depth. You are welcome to refine anything about the article but when you seem to make a mistake or two as above I will continue to point it out. You decide what you want to do, I will query it if I see a need to. I hope that is comprehendible. Regards,
Eddaido (
talk) 09:52, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Dormskirk: I know just what I meant when I wrote (whatever) and it still means the same to me x years later. Doesn't mean everyone else grasps what I intended. I think you should make the changes you see necessary and we can discuss them if it turns out we disagree.
Eddaido (
talk) 05:32, 31 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Dormskirk told you very clearly where you went wrong, and the above responses explain nothing (or are simply misguided, such as the defence of unreferenced claims) and are profoundly unhelpful.
The Drover's Wife (
talk) 10:19, 20 July 2021 (UTC)reply