![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Article is nothing more than a list. Wordy McWordWord 01:02, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
A man who did delete or remove the article of DOD250 is deconstructive. Persons who governs Wikiworld are blockheads. Idiots always delete things correctly been. -- 220.105.223.9 ( talk) 15:44, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
I've been removing this material because:
As long as these concerns exist, I'll continue to remove this material. Oli Filth( talk) 15:06, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
It's awfully odd that when talking about a company with as many products as DOD, there's some random paragraph about the Big Pig being some limited run (100 units only?) pedal that's supposed to be a nod to Dave Gilmour when the pedal was marketed as an extremely grungy distortion. The information has absolutely no references and I wonder if it's bogus. Anyone? 75.48.5.163 ( talk) 07:11, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
I've removed this section. I agree that it's an non-cited rumor and it also did not fit well with the article. -- 66.30.193.254 ( talk) 00:11, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Article is nothing more than a list. Wordy McWordWord 01:02, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
A man who did delete or remove the article of DOD250 is deconstructive. Persons who governs Wikiworld are blockheads. Idiots always delete things correctly been. -- 220.105.223.9 ( talk) 15:44, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
I've been removing this material because:
As long as these concerns exist, I'll continue to remove this material. Oli Filth( talk) 15:06, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
It's awfully odd that when talking about a company with as many products as DOD, there's some random paragraph about the Big Pig being some limited run (100 units only?) pedal that's supposed to be a nod to Dave Gilmour when the pedal was marketed as an extremely grungy distortion. The information has absolutely no references and I wonder if it's bogus. Anyone? 75.48.5.163 ( talk) 07:11, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
I've removed this section. I agree that it's an non-cited rumor and it also did not fit well with the article. -- 66.30.193.254 ( talk) 00:11, 7 July 2010 (UTC)