![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
With no news since Summer 2014, this is almost certainly vaporware. Shouldn't we change the self-assured present indicative on this article? complainer ( talk) 14:47, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Shouldn't the title if this game be "Cuphead: Don't Deal With the Devil"? That what I'm seeing in the official website. 108.57.88.245 ( talk) 10:37, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
The article about the game being a trilogy and/or having add on packages (a la Sonic and Knuckles) was faulty. The Polygon article ( http://www.polygon.com/2014/7/4/5870623/cartoon-inspired-cuphead-is-going-to-be-a-trilogy) incorrectly references the Killscreen article ( http://killscreendaily.com/articles/cuphead-roughly-40-done-hey-its-gonna-be-trilogy/) which, if you read it, shows that the developer doesn't have specific plans for a trilogy:
"But it will ultimately be a trilogy, of sorts! Moldenhauer was just spitballing, but he envisions a set of expansion packs which build on the weapons and elements introduced in the first game, sorta like the Sonic & Knuckles cartridge re-made earlier Sonic games. It's like a trilogy of games that will build Cuphead into its fullest possible Cuphead."
Furthermore, the developer himself clarified the statements on NeoGAF:
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.17.31.14 ( talk) 16:18, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Should the infamous Dean Takahashi gameplay video incident be mentioned here, or should it be left out simply because it isn't really notable? 174.3.224.209 ( talk) 05:15, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Hey, he did say that it wasn't really notable. 174.3.224.209 ( talk) 22:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Disruptive comment |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
wikipedia will always conform to sjw stuff you cant mention these things in articles.. been proven over and over again. even though the article mentions the games "difficulty" citing the reason WHY people view it as difficult (like the deantak debacle) you're not allowed to mention it or you'll get undone + semi protect even though its not vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A000:CB07:6400:7132:FA5C:1B7A:7C64 ( talk) 01:25, 18 October 2017 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Cuphead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:37, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
If anyone's interested, there's an official Cuphead wiki at https://cuphead.gamepedia.com Visokor ( talk) 21:30, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Cuphead has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
You should change the screenshot of Cuphead and Mugman fighting Captain Brineybeard because that screenshot is of an early version of the game and isn't up to date. Minecraftfan04 ( talk) 23:25, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Since Dissident just added where the developer is based, wouldn't it make sense to switch to Canadian English? jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) ( talk • contribs) 18:48, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Looks like there was a bit of a mix up under the awards section. Cuphead won Best Visual Design at the Golden Joystick Awards, not Best Racing Game, as humorous as that would be. Would somebody be able to edit that in, since it appears this page is protected? Mirrdrag ( talk) 07:57, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
It feels like the whole section has been written up by someone who has not even followed buzz about the game. Why is some racism "controversy" I've never heard of outside this article mentioned that was started by a source and a rather unknown author, but the discussion of the game's difficulty has been completely removed when it was explicitly discussed by some of the largest and most notable video game outlets (and I mean outside of the whole Polygon controversy before release)?
https://www.gamespot.com/articles/cuphead-and-the-problems-with-difficulty-in-video-/1100-6454074/
https://www.polygon.com/2017/10/4/16422060/cuphead-difficulty-exclusion -- 217.85.59.106 ( talk) 00:38, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
What else do you expect in this liberal echo chamber shithole? There's a reason contributors have dropped so much in the last five years.
![]() | This
edit request to
Cuphead has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under "Artists" add:
Hanna Abi-Hanna, Animator Jake Clark, Animator Joseph Coleman, Animator Tina Nawrocki, Animator Thomas "Smo" Smolenski, Animator Danielle Johnson, Assistant Animator Caitlin Russell, Background Artist and Painter Ali Morbi, Painting Post-production and Seperation Maja Moldenhauer, Inking and Clean up Tyler Moldenhauer, Digital Painter Warren Clark, Hand-Lettering Artist Mark Simonson, Type/Letter/Font Guru
Source: [1] TinaNawrocki ( talk) 23:41, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Regarding this revert [2] I do think a smaller section on this apparent racism issue is not undue, but the proposed content is far too much. It's at most a paragraph under the reception section. -- MASEM ( t) 01:05, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
That this article will cover some lone lunatic's unfounded accusation of racism but not the takashi debacle (the only reason 40% of people know about this game) is a perfect respresentation of what's wrong with wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.138.213.196 ( talk) 18:05, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
should the review from Toonami be mentioned? They gave Cuphead a 9 out of 10. Visokor ( talk) 19:25, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
StudioMDHR announced new downloadable content for Cuphead called "Cuphead: The Delicious Last Course", and I think the article needs a "Downloadable Content" section to reflect this information. The DLC is going to release in 2019. MacKing92 ( talk) 14:07, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
The Wiki page makes the assumption that StudioMDHR did this completely solo. However, it is clear that Microsoft funded the game and is further an exclusive to Microsoft (indefinitely). Notable involvement should be part of this page, as it is on other pages when indie games partner with a major publisher, as it changes the perspective that it is a Microsoft exclusive that is majority-funded by Microsoft. For example, Halo Wars was made by Ensemble Studios and their page has significant mentions of Microsoft's involvement.
Sources: [4] [5] Kiro419 ( talk) 06:57, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
A Mac version of the game has been released on Steam on October 19th. [1] DrDeath ( talk) 07:31, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Cuphead has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The following line: "Cuphead's gameplay is based around continuous boss fights,"
Should be replaced with Cuphead's gameplay is based around continual boss fights, for vocabulary's sake Tomandrewlento ( talk) 20:43, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Cuphead has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
new movie cuphead the movie coming in 2019 new new new new 51.223.84.246 ( talk) 11:19, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Technically speaking, even though this game is well polished and overly ambitious. It's still not the first to use old animation cells for gameplay. Escape from Cartoon Hell which was a free game using the openbor program, used old ub iwerks animation cells and backgrounds. It was crude and poorly made, but the concept was there... you also had to fight a devil character in hell... this was made in 2006/2007 and the YouTube upload date for this game proves it.
Kolbek79 ( talk) 04:51, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Keeping in mind that Tesla's OS runs a Linux variant, and secondly that only part of the game is coming as a proof of concept, it is not appropriate to add Tesla as a platform here. We can mention this proof of concept in the body. -- Masem ( t) 02:14, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
I think in legacy there should at least be a mention of how there was a cuphead Arby's deal to have toys in the kid's meals based on the game — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pwiva1 ( talk • contribs) 19:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
I was just wondering if we should split the animated series paragraph to a full article since we have info about the show, footage from the show and some knowledge about when it will be released. LittleMAHER1 ( talk) 05:02, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
With no news since Summer 2014, this is almost certainly vaporware. Shouldn't we change the self-assured present indicative on this article? complainer ( talk) 14:47, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Shouldn't the title if this game be "Cuphead: Don't Deal With the Devil"? That what I'm seeing in the official website. 108.57.88.245 ( talk) 10:37, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
The article about the game being a trilogy and/or having add on packages (a la Sonic and Knuckles) was faulty. The Polygon article ( http://www.polygon.com/2014/7/4/5870623/cartoon-inspired-cuphead-is-going-to-be-a-trilogy) incorrectly references the Killscreen article ( http://killscreendaily.com/articles/cuphead-roughly-40-done-hey-its-gonna-be-trilogy/) which, if you read it, shows that the developer doesn't have specific plans for a trilogy:
"But it will ultimately be a trilogy, of sorts! Moldenhauer was just spitballing, but he envisions a set of expansion packs which build on the weapons and elements introduced in the first game, sorta like the Sonic & Knuckles cartridge re-made earlier Sonic games. It's like a trilogy of games that will build Cuphead into its fullest possible Cuphead."
Furthermore, the developer himself clarified the statements on NeoGAF:
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.17.31.14 ( talk) 16:18, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Should the infamous Dean Takahashi gameplay video incident be mentioned here, or should it be left out simply because it isn't really notable? 174.3.224.209 ( talk) 05:15, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Hey, he did say that it wasn't really notable. 174.3.224.209 ( talk) 22:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Disruptive comment |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
wikipedia will always conform to sjw stuff you cant mention these things in articles.. been proven over and over again. even though the article mentions the games "difficulty" citing the reason WHY people view it as difficult (like the deantak debacle) you're not allowed to mention it or you'll get undone + semi protect even though its not vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A000:CB07:6400:7132:FA5C:1B7A:7C64 ( talk) 01:25, 18 October 2017 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Cuphead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:37, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
If anyone's interested, there's an official Cuphead wiki at https://cuphead.gamepedia.com Visokor ( talk) 21:30, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Cuphead has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
You should change the screenshot of Cuphead and Mugman fighting Captain Brineybeard because that screenshot is of an early version of the game and isn't up to date. Minecraftfan04 ( talk) 23:25, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Since Dissident just added where the developer is based, wouldn't it make sense to switch to Canadian English? jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) ( talk • contribs) 18:48, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Looks like there was a bit of a mix up under the awards section. Cuphead won Best Visual Design at the Golden Joystick Awards, not Best Racing Game, as humorous as that would be. Would somebody be able to edit that in, since it appears this page is protected? Mirrdrag ( talk) 07:57, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
It feels like the whole section has been written up by someone who has not even followed buzz about the game. Why is some racism "controversy" I've never heard of outside this article mentioned that was started by a source and a rather unknown author, but the discussion of the game's difficulty has been completely removed when it was explicitly discussed by some of the largest and most notable video game outlets (and I mean outside of the whole Polygon controversy before release)?
https://www.gamespot.com/articles/cuphead-and-the-problems-with-difficulty-in-video-/1100-6454074/
https://www.polygon.com/2017/10/4/16422060/cuphead-difficulty-exclusion -- 217.85.59.106 ( talk) 00:38, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
What else do you expect in this liberal echo chamber shithole? There's a reason contributors have dropped so much in the last five years.
![]() | This
edit request to
Cuphead has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under "Artists" add:
Hanna Abi-Hanna, Animator Jake Clark, Animator Joseph Coleman, Animator Tina Nawrocki, Animator Thomas "Smo" Smolenski, Animator Danielle Johnson, Assistant Animator Caitlin Russell, Background Artist and Painter Ali Morbi, Painting Post-production and Seperation Maja Moldenhauer, Inking and Clean up Tyler Moldenhauer, Digital Painter Warren Clark, Hand-Lettering Artist Mark Simonson, Type/Letter/Font Guru
Source: [1] TinaNawrocki ( talk) 23:41, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Regarding this revert [2] I do think a smaller section on this apparent racism issue is not undue, but the proposed content is far too much. It's at most a paragraph under the reception section. -- MASEM ( t) 01:05, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
That this article will cover some lone lunatic's unfounded accusation of racism but not the takashi debacle (the only reason 40% of people know about this game) is a perfect respresentation of what's wrong with wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.138.213.196 ( talk) 18:05, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
should the review from Toonami be mentioned? They gave Cuphead a 9 out of 10. Visokor ( talk) 19:25, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
StudioMDHR announced new downloadable content for Cuphead called "Cuphead: The Delicious Last Course", and I think the article needs a "Downloadable Content" section to reflect this information. The DLC is going to release in 2019. MacKing92 ( talk) 14:07, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
The Wiki page makes the assumption that StudioMDHR did this completely solo. However, it is clear that Microsoft funded the game and is further an exclusive to Microsoft (indefinitely). Notable involvement should be part of this page, as it is on other pages when indie games partner with a major publisher, as it changes the perspective that it is a Microsoft exclusive that is majority-funded by Microsoft. For example, Halo Wars was made by Ensemble Studios and their page has significant mentions of Microsoft's involvement.
Sources: [4] [5] Kiro419 ( talk) 06:57, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
A Mac version of the game has been released on Steam on October 19th. [1] DrDeath ( talk) 07:31, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Cuphead has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The following line: "Cuphead's gameplay is based around continuous boss fights,"
Should be replaced with Cuphead's gameplay is based around continual boss fights, for vocabulary's sake Tomandrewlento ( talk) 20:43, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Cuphead has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
new movie cuphead the movie coming in 2019 new new new new 51.223.84.246 ( talk) 11:19, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Technically speaking, even though this game is well polished and overly ambitious. It's still not the first to use old animation cells for gameplay. Escape from Cartoon Hell which was a free game using the openbor program, used old ub iwerks animation cells and backgrounds. It was crude and poorly made, but the concept was there... you also had to fight a devil character in hell... this was made in 2006/2007 and the YouTube upload date for this game proves it.
Kolbek79 ( talk) 04:51, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Keeping in mind that Tesla's OS runs a Linux variant, and secondly that only part of the game is coming as a proof of concept, it is not appropriate to add Tesla as a platform here. We can mention this proof of concept in the body. -- Masem ( t) 02:14, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
I think in legacy there should at least be a mention of how there was a cuphead Arby's deal to have toys in the kid's meals based on the game — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pwiva1 ( talk • contribs) 19:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
I was just wondering if we should split the animated series paragraph to a full article since we have info about the show, footage from the show and some knowledge about when it will be released. LittleMAHER1 ( talk) 05:02, 30 March 2021 (UTC)