This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Popular culture, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Popular cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Popular cultureTemplate:WikiProject Popular culturePopular culture articles
This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
Why was this moved to a separate article? It is not enough by itself to portray a decent article and didn't clutter the original. Can this move be undone?
Nengscoz416 (
talk)
19:32, 6 February 2008 (UTC)reply
Many of my additions of cultural material from articles on monarchs were being deleted by editors who said they weren't relevant and cluttered the articles (
for example, a shorter section than this one). I thus decided to move any cultural sections that were relatively long to separate articles to prevent these stupid edit wars. Seems I can't please everyone! --
Necrothesp (
talk)
10:41, 7 February 2008 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Popular culture, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Popular cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Popular cultureTemplate:WikiProject Popular culturePopular culture articles
This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
Why was this moved to a separate article? It is not enough by itself to portray a decent article and didn't clutter the original. Can this move be undone?
Nengscoz416 (
talk)
19:32, 6 February 2008 (UTC)reply
Many of my additions of cultural material from articles on monarchs were being deleted by editors who said they weren't relevant and cluttered the articles (
for example, a shorter section than this one). I thus decided to move any cultural sections that were relatively long to separate articles to prevent these stupid edit wars. Seems I can't please everyone! --
Necrothesp (
talk)
10:41, 7 February 2008 (UTC)reply
