| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Conversion table for Y chromosome haplogroups article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 25 September 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
This table appears to be entirely original research. Dougweller ( talk) 08:21, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not at all. It merely cross-references differing nomenclature over the years for the same Y chromosome haplogroups and their subclades. ISOGG's Y-DNA Haplogroup Tree has been cited by dozens of peer-reviewed scientific papers. That's one of the explicitly mentioned criteria in the WP:SCHOLARSHIP policy. Nathanm mn ( talk) 21:56, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
This article is based on the 2002 Y Chromosome Consortium article entitled A Nomenclature System for the Tree of Human Y-Chromosomal Binary Haplogroups and reports the adjustments/modifications done since then. And without such a conversion article about the difference between the long hand and short hand reporting of YCC haplogroups, one would be easily confused. Jrcrin001 ( talk) 15:15, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Conversion table for Y chromosome haplogroups article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
| This article was nominated for deletion on 25 September 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
This table appears to be entirely original research. Dougweller ( talk) 08:21, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not at all. It merely cross-references differing nomenclature over the years for the same Y chromosome haplogroups and their subclades. ISOGG's Y-DNA Haplogroup Tree has been cited by dozens of peer-reviewed scientific papers. That's one of the explicitly mentioned criteria in the WP:SCHOLARSHIP policy. Nathanm mn ( talk) 21:56, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
This article is based on the 2002 Y Chromosome Consortium article entitled A Nomenclature System for the Tree of Human Y-Chromosomal Binary Haplogroups and reports the adjustments/modifications done since then. And without such a conversion article about the difference between the long hand and short hand reporting of YCC haplogroups, one would be easily confused. Jrcrin001 ( talk) 15:15, 31 August 2016 (UTC)