![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 21 January 2024. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
what are the Implications of a contract within a contract
Unless I miss some sublety, there are no implications. If contractual documents are incorporated by reference into the main contract, they are all treated as a single agreement. But if each document is separate, albeit linked, say, because they deal with different aspects of the same transaction but with performance in different states, they will each be dealt with under their own proper laws. David91 01:31, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
See also: depecage -- Legis ( talk - contributions) 14:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
I have removed the unsourced information and original research in the article, per WP:V. This could develop into a reasonable article, this will give a cleaner slate to work from. I have also changed the general references list into a further reading section. // Timothy :: talk 07:43, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Move as proposed, with the exception of retaining the spelling in Characterisation (law). If that name proves to be controversial, please open a separate discussion for it. Jafeluv ( talk) 13:38, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
– These articles all use parentheses to indicate a subtopic or intersection of topics, rather than for disambiguation. We write " Prisons in Chile", not " Prison (Chile)", and " Railway electrification system" not " Railway (electric)". The nominated articles are in Category:Conflict of laws. Most are the intersection of "Conflict of laws" with some legal field. I suggest the name "X (conflict)" should be "conflict of X laws"; other possibilities are "Conflict of laws and X" or "X and conflict of laws".
The last three listed names are somewhat different:
I have some significant concerns about the intro to this article.
Needs a pretty serious rewrite. I'll try and do it if I have time, but I am not likely to be able to get to it anytime soon.
--
Legis (
talk -
contribs) 06:09, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 21 January 2024. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
what are the Implications of a contract within a contract
Unless I miss some sublety, there are no implications. If contractual documents are incorporated by reference into the main contract, they are all treated as a single agreement. But if each document is separate, albeit linked, say, because they deal with different aspects of the same transaction but with performance in different states, they will each be dealt with under their own proper laws. David91 01:31, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
See also: depecage -- Legis ( talk - contributions) 14:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
I have removed the unsourced information and original research in the article, per WP:V. This could develop into a reasonable article, this will give a cleaner slate to work from. I have also changed the general references list into a further reading section. // Timothy :: talk 07:43, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Move as proposed, with the exception of retaining the spelling in Characterisation (law). If that name proves to be controversial, please open a separate discussion for it. Jafeluv ( talk) 13:38, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
– These articles all use parentheses to indicate a subtopic or intersection of topics, rather than for disambiguation. We write " Prisons in Chile", not " Prison (Chile)", and " Railway electrification system" not " Railway (electric)". The nominated articles are in Category:Conflict of laws. Most are the intersection of "Conflict of laws" with some legal field. I suggest the name "X (conflict)" should be "conflict of X laws"; other possibilities are "Conflict of laws and X" or "X and conflict of laws".
The last three listed names are somewhat different:
I have some significant concerns about the intro to this article.
Needs a pretty serious rewrite. I'll try and do it if I have time, but I am not likely to be able to get to it anytime soon.
--
Legis (
talk -
contribs) 06:09, 17 March 2015 (UTC)