From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

copyvio?

@ CanonLawJunkie: - please look at this earwig vs. http://www.newadvent.org - and address. Icewhiz ( talk) 08:40, 22 January 2018 (UTC) reply

@ Icewhiz: I am aware of the copyrighted nature of New Advent's transcriptions of the now public-domain Old Catholic Encyclopedia. I copied these articles (and edited them) from WikiSource ( https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Catholic_Encyclopedia_(1913)/Bigamy_(in_Canon_Law) https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Catholic_Encyclopedia_(1913)/Contract https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Catholic_Encyclopedia_(1913)/Ecclesiastical_Censures and duly cited this fact using the {{ catholic}} template, found in the "Bibliography" section of each page in question. There was no violation of copyright, and a purposeful effort to the contrary. Canon Law Junkie §§§ Talk 03:42, 23 January 2018 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

copyvio?

@ CanonLawJunkie: - please look at this earwig vs. http://www.newadvent.org - and address. Icewhiz ( talk) 08:40, 22 January 2018 (UTC) reply

@ Icewhiz: I am aware of the copyrighted nature of New Advent's transcriptions of the now public-domain Old Catholic Encyclopedia. I copied these articles (and edited them) from WikiSource ( https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Catholic_Encyclopedia_(1913)/Bigamy_(in_Canon_Law) https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Catholic_Encyclopedia_(1913)/Contract https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Catholic_Encyclopedia_(1913)/Ecclesiastical_Censures and duly cited this fact using the {{ catholic}} template, found in the "Bibliography" section of each page in question. There was no violation of copyright, and a purposeful effort to the contrary. Canon Law Junkie §§§ Talk 03:42, 23 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook