This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Orders, decorations, and medals Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of orders, decorations, and medals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Orders, decorations, and medalsWikipedia:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsTemplate:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsOrders, decorations, and medals articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Australia: Military history Low‑importance Conspicuous Service Cross (Australia) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian What's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Military history: Culture / South Pacific This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force

Daily page views Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.

Is this section necessary? Does it add to the article? -- Oliver Nouther ( talk) 21:30, 11 April 2010 (UTC) reply

The addition of a 'Fictional Characters' section would not demean the article but it may help put the topic in context. -- Nford24 ( talk) 18:47, 24 December 2011 (AEST)

I disagree, it seems unnecessary to me. Anotherclown ( talk) 08:56, 24 December 2011 (UTC) reply

G'day, good question. I'm inclined to agree with Anotherclown on this one. I'm not sure what benefit the article would get from listing fictional characters that have "received" the award. That's just my opinion, though. You might consider asking for wider opinions, though, if you want to get a broader consensus. Regards, AustralianRupert ( talk) 00:18, 26 December 2011 (UTC) reply