![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
The John Cowan referred to in this article is not the John Cowan referred to in the article of that name, so the hyperlink is now removed. -- 07:05, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
Does anyone have ideas to expand this article, or should this be merged with something else? I suppose we could list current CSUR proposal scripts like Tengwar and Cirth? -- Jordi· ✆ 09:54, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
There appears to be some discrepancies between the ranges given on the main CSUR page and the CSUR Roadmap for the Aui, Amman-Iar, Streich and Xaîni scripts. I have used the values from the roadmap since using the values on the main page does not allow enough room for the Xaîni script. -- Wm243 ( talk) 10:24, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Is there any alternatives to ConScript for registering common fictional alphabets? The trouble with ConScript is that it occupies not only the "Corporate" Private subarea, but also the "Private" Private subarea, such that a club that needs a really private alphabet, cannot combine that with also using Tengwar in their discussions. Another trouble is that it has filled up the BMP private area with alphabets with virtually no usage. Tengwar, Cirth and Klingon are widely used, most of the other not. ... said: Rursus ( mbork³) 12:31, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
It seems the original CSUR isn't maintained anymore, so an unofficial registry has sprung up: http://www.kreativekorp.com/ucsur/ Can we include a link to it on the main page, as well as including some of the new proposed script mappings that aren't in the original CSUR? These are marked in green on the unofficial CSUR page. ThVortex ( talk) 23:55, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Should (Under) ConScript Unicode Registry code blocks get pages like Unicode blocks? 67.81.132.165 ( talk) 17:52, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
There's a nice semi-phonetic alphabet created for Modern Dutch language, that I think it really deserves to be encoded into Unicode 15 or later, like we have encoded Deseret and Shavian for Modern English. More into on this Dutch conscript: https://omniglot.com/conscripts/peperklips.htm 94.180.96.222 ( talk) 13:53, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Neither the "Aprilian-ConScript Unicode Registry" (ACSUR, Special:Diff/1129632034) nor the "Under-ConScript Unicode Registry" (UCSUR, Special:Diff/1129634689) appear to be described by other sources than the publishers themselves and a few font projects that intend to include as many scripts as possible in their fonts. Neither of them are reliable sources. It appears that especially UCSUR was publicized primarily through Wikipedia, which isn't compatible with Wikipedia's role as a tertiary source that mainly summarizes what reliable secondary sources say. Using Wikipedia as a promotion platform for alternatives to notable but discontinued article subjects would turn the encyclopedia into a primary source and is incompatible with WP:NOTPROMO.
I have thus removed the completely-unsourced "ACSUR" and the unreliably sourced "UCSUR" from the article. If there are reliable sources describing either of these, please provide them here. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 12:15, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Hkw5879 ( talk) 08:03, 25 January 2023 (UTC)There is also growing coverage of the Supplementary Multilingual Plane (SMP), in the range U+010000..U+01FFFF, and of Michael Everson's ConScript Unicode Registry (CSUR) with Rebecca Bettencourt's Under-CSUR additions. [1]
References
The redirect
Rebecca Bettencourt has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 9 § Rebecca Bettencourt until a consensus is reached.
Snorlax
Monster
11:03, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
The John Cowan referred to in this article is not the John Cowan referred to in the article of that name, so the hyperlink is now removed. -- 07:05, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
Does anyone have ideas to expand this article, or should this be merged with something else? I suppose we could list current CSUR proposal scripts like Tengwar and Cirth? -- Jordi· ✆ 09:54, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
There appears to be some discrepancies between the ranges given on the main CSUR page and the CSUR Roadmap for the Aui, Amman-Iar, Streich and Xaîni scripts. I have used the values from the roadmap since using the values on the main page does not allow enough room for the Xaîni script. -- Wm243 ( talk) 10:24, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Is there any alternatives to ConScript for registering common fictional alphabets? The trouble with ConScript is that it occupies not only the "Corporate" Private subarea, but also the "Private" Private subarea, such that a club that needs a really private alphabet, cannot combine that with also using Tengwar in their discussions. Another trouble is that it has filled up the BMP private area with alphabets with virtually no usage. Tengwar, Cirth and Klingon are widely used, most of the other not. ... said: Rursus ( mbork³) 12:31, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
It seems the original CSUR isn't maintained anymore, so an unofficial registry has sprung up: http://www.kreativekorp.com/ucsur/ Can we include a link to it on the main page, as well as including some of the new proposed script mappings that aren't in the original CSUR? These are marked in green on the unofficial CSUR page. ThVortex ( talk) 23:55, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Should (Under) ConScript Unicode Registry code blocks get pages like Unicode blocks? 67.81.132.165 ( talk) 17:52, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
There's a nice semi-phonetic alphabet created for Modern Dutch language, that I think it really deserves to be encoded into Unicode 15 or later, like we have encoded Deseret and Shavian for Modern English. More into on this Dutch conscript: https://omniglot.com/conscripts/peperklips.htm 94.180.96.222 ( talk) 13:53, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Neither the "Aprilian-ConScript Unicode Registry" (ACSUR, Special:Diff/1129632034) nor the "Under-ConScript Unicode Registry" (UCSUR, Special:Diff/1129634689) appear to be described by other sources than the publishers themselves and a few font projects that intend to include as many scripts as possible in their fonts. Neither of them are reliable sources. It appears that especially UCSUR was publicized primarily through Wikipedia, which isn't compatible with Wikipedia's role as a tertiary source that mainly summarizes what reliable secondary sources say. Using Wikipedia as a promotion platform for alternatives to notable but discontinued article subjects would turn the encyclopedia into a primary source and is incompatible with WP:NOTPROMO.
I have thus removed the completely-unsourced "ACSUR" and the unreliably sourced "UCSUR" from the article. If there are reliable sources describing either of these, please provide them here. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 12:15, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Hkw5879 ( talk) 08:03, 25 January 2023 (UTC)There is also growing coverage of the Supplementary Multilingual Plane (SMP), in the range U+010000..U+01FFFF, and of Michael Everson's ConScript Unicode Registry (CSUR) with Rebecca Bettencourt's Under-CSUR additions. [1]
References
The redirect
Rebecca Bettencourt has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 9 § Rebecca Bettencourt until a consensus is reached.
Snorlax
Monster
11:03, 9 August 2023 (UTC)