![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Where is blueSky's ATProtocol?
![]() | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
About to migrate section "Comparison of projects" of article "Distributed social network" Toni Stoev ( talk) 01:05, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Could someone explain why SparkleShare is listed here? It's not really "social networking", it's Git-based, Dropbox-like file sharing and collaboration. Sixthhokage1 ( talk) 16:45, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Yep - I second the above. Suggest it's deleted in a couple of weeks if no-one justifies it's presence. Iamsorandom ( talk) 13:48, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
The Appleseed project website seems to be down - and moreover, it is redirecting to this wikipedia page. Does anyone know any more about this? Has the project folded? Iamsorandom ( talk) 13:48, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
this is a dead link (camped domain) i have no clue how to mark it otherwise i would. kthxbai Keastes know thyself 18:56, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I was wondering if MediaGoblin should be included on this list. Esn ( talk) 21:43, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
I have re-introduced the ownCloud project, which now supports federation, after previously removing it from the distributed social network article. Toni Stoev ( talk) 14:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
By clicking through the list of projects, I realized that many of them where dead or stale. Does anyone disagree to split the list into two sections? One would be "active projects" and the other "inactive projects". The second section would be for projects where the project page and repository isn't reachable anymore and/or the last activity (blog post, commit, ...) had been done two years ago. Daris ( talk) 13:08, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 19 external links on Comparison of software and protocols for distributed social networking. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://get6d.com/manifestoWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:48, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
In network terminology, "distributed" usually refers to pure P2P software where every node is both a client and a server. Scuttlebutt and Jami are examples of this. Most of the projects in these tables are for creating federations of servers, like email. Can I suggest changing "distributed" to "decentralized"? I also suggest have separate tables for federated social network projects, and actual distributed/ P2P ones. -- Danylstrype ( talk) 04:10, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Each entry is written to a different standard. For example, under "Privacy Support" for Element it says "Yes. e2ee in Personal message by default. e2ee must be enabled for group chat", for Mastodon it says "Yes", and for Zap it says "Extensive". -- Hiveir ( talk) 01:29, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
I don't find it fitting the definition of social networking service. - bkil ( talk) 22:04, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
This article is about comparing instances of software and comparing instances of protocols, both sets related to respective software and/or protocol projects. For comparison of federated social networking services, possibly other articles can be used, like the List of social networking services ( Comparison of social networking websites). Toni Stoev ( talk) 07:55, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
I just finished adding Mobilizon manually to the table of projects. It took over an hour on my phone. Given the common/typical availability of machine-readable (or fuzzy-guessing) data for “X uses A, B for Y, Z” (e.g. License used, ProgrammingLanguage(s), etc.)…
… Couldn’t a(n existing?) Bot be utilized for aiding editors (of this and similar Pages/Tables)?
Maybe somebody can reply here with a known-relevant/useful Bot??? SilentAshes ( talk) 16:38, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Comparison articles are WP:SAL. We need articles to preexist, or for citations to WP:RS which can vouch each entry meets baseline WP:GNG for inclusion – linking a random homepage, source code repository, etc is not sufficient.
As of this writing, there is a whole lot of trash on the page not meeting global upstream inclusion criteria… §Projects and §Dead are about to get significantly smaller… Please use the interim to cite RS, write those stub parent articles, and do other cleanup to ensure your preferred entries remain. Thank you, and Happy Trails! -- dsprc [talk] 08:47, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
I guess it should be listed: https://gotosocial.org/ Strk ( talk) 12:01, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Does Bluesky qualify to be included in this comparison? Venudxb ( talk) 10:14, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Where is blueSky's ATProtocol?
![]() | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
About to migrate section "Comparison of projects" of article "Distributed social network" Toni Stoev ( talk) 01:05, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Could someone explain why SparkleShare is listed here? It's not really "social networking", it's Git-based, Dropbox-like file sharing and collaboration. Sixthhokage1 ( talk) 16:45, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Yep - I second the above. Suggest it's deleted in a couple of weeks if no-one justifies it's presence. Iamsorandom ( talk) 13:48, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
The Appleseed project website seems to be down - and moreover, it is redirecting to this wikipedia page. Does anyone know any more about this? Has the project folded? Iamsorandom ( talk) 13:48, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
this is a dead link (camped domain) i have no clue how to mark it otherwise i would. kthxbai Keastes know thyself 18:56, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I was wondering if MediaGoblin should be included on this list. Esn ( talk) 21:43, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
I have re-introduced the ownCloud project, which now supports federation, after previously removing it from the distributed social network article. Toni Stoev ( talk) 14:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
By clicking through the list of projects, I realized that many of them where dead or stale. Does anyone disagree to split the list into two sections? One would be "active projects" and the other "inactive projects". The second section would be for projects where the project page and repository isn't reachable anymore and/or the last activity (blog post, commit, ...) had been done two years ago. Daris ( talk) 13:08, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 19 external links on Comparison of software and protocols for distributed social networking. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://get6d.com/manifestoWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:48, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
In network terminology, "distributed" usually refers to pure P2P software where every node is both a client and a server. Scuttlebutt and Jami are examples of this. Most of the projects in these tables are for creating federations of servers, like email. Can I suggest changing "distributed" to "decentralized"? I also suggest have separate tables for federated social network projects, and actual distributed/ P2P ones. -- Danylstrype ( talk) 04:10, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Each entry is written to a different standard. For example, under "Privacy Support" for Element it says "Yes. e2ee in Personal message by default. e2ee must be enabled for group chat", for Mastodon it says "Yes", and for Zap it says "Extensive". -- Hiveir ( talk) 01:29, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
I don't find it fitting the definition of social networking service. - bkil ( talk) 22:04, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
This article is about comparing instances of software and comparing instances of protocols, both sets related to respective software and/or protocol projects. For comparison of federated social networking services, possibly other articles can be used, like the List of social networking services ( Comparison of social networking websites). Toni Stoev ( talk) 07:55, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
I just finished adding Mobilizon manually to the table of projects. It took over an hour on my phone. Given the common/typical availability of machine-readable (or fuzzy-guessing) data for “X uses A, B for Y, Z” (e.g. License used, ProgrammingLanguage(s), etc.)…
… Couldn’t a(n existing?) Bot be utilized for aiding editors (of this and similar Pages/Tables)?
Maybe somebody can reply here with a known-relevant/useful Bot??? SilentAshes ( talk) 16:38, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Comparison articles are WP:SAL. We need articles to preexist, or for citations to WP:RS which can vouch each entry meets baseline WP:GNG for inclusion – linking a random homepage, source code repository, etc is not sufficient.
As of this writing, there is a whole lot of trash on the page not meeting global upstream inclusion criteria… §Projects and §Dead are about to get significantly smaller… Please use the interim to cite RS, write those stub parent articles, and do other cleanup to ensure your preferred entries remain. Thank you, and Happy Trails! -- dsprc [talk] 08:47, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
I guess it should be listed: https://gotosocial.org/ Strk ( talk) 12:01, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Does Bluesky qualify to be included in this comparison? Venudxb ( talk) 10:14, 9 January 2024 (UTC)