This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 2 August 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This article is not a linkfarm. Before adding products to the list, make sure they are notable by having their own article. If not, try writing the article first. |
I don't think JUnit really belongs in this list. Regards, Ben Aveling 03:17, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Eggplant needs to stay on this list. It's been around longer than Ranorex, and has more users. It's an important tool that needs to be in every tester's tool box. I've been using a combination of tools including Eggplant since about 2003. Ajfisher2 ( talk) 22:30, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Putting Ranorex and Eggpalnt back. Creating a list based solely on number of users is a truly stupid criteria. It would be like me being paid solely for the number of bugs I find. There are many other things that should be considered when posting a tool besides number of users. Approach to the problem, technologies supported, licensing, cost, skill required of the tester...these are all things that are things I consider when adding a tool to my toolbox. By removing Eggplant, for example, you've removed half the tools on the list that support Mac OS. Are you a tester? I don't think you are, or else you would understand this.
So how many users does a tool need to have? My understanding of wikipedia is to provide information. I was trying to provide some. There is a link encouraging the expansion of this list. I'm going to remove that link because it's all about YOUR opinion of the list since it's impossible to add anything without you removing it and dismissing it out of hand. I have 3 or 4 tools that I would like to add in addition to Eggplant, but now I'm not because you've successfully made it a complete waste of time.
Eggplant certainly is a different tool, it works much, much differently than the rest of the tools on this list...which is why I thought it important to add. I hate to burst your bubble, but most of the tools here are listed for advertising purposes. It does things differently, so I thought it important. If you're so hell bent on removing tools because they don't have as many users as your tool of choice, you might as well just remove everything except QTP and RFT. Ajfisher2 ( talk) 14:34, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
OK. I've put up a page for Eggplant. I also do not see anything on WP:Links that qualifies removal. But I will do the extra work. I think notable should include, in addition to the points mentioned above, maturity, and approaches that are outside what you might call "standard" for GUI tools. All the tools on that list use gray-box testing. Eggplant is a blackbox tool, and has a decent user base. Ajfisher2 ( talk) 20:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
I am reminded that this list should not contain external links by WP:NOTLINKFARM. Externally linked articles will be removed.
A list for GUI testing tools is also available here http://www.testingfaqs.org/t-gui.html. Maybe somebody wants to add a tool at this article's list. I would like to, but I have no time! 194.219.52.200 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:19, 14 July 2010 (UTC).
I was wondering if you can include QAliber to the list, it is an open source project at sourceforge ( http://sourceforge.net/projects/qaliber/)
Please let me know what do you think, Regards, Benny —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.90.236.138 ( talk) 13:35, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
This page would benefit from a table with attributes such as
Hi Walter,
I added a and open source GUI testing tool called VANGA. I am a contributor to the project. Why did you roll back my adition?
Thanks,
Tervel — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.108.170.8 ( talk) 15:22, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
In the table Open Source GUI testing tools some rows have an entry "Example".
Is this filler text that should be removed?
JamesThomasMoon1979
03:31, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Currently the article has FLOSS tools for GUI test, proprietary tools for GUI test, and a mixed table for test-automation. Can we split the third table, to give us four tables, and consistency? :-)
My other suggestion is a bit more invasive; there are many names listed under GUI test, and also under test automation; should we just make a checkmark-column, so that we can show which GUI test tools also support test automation? It seems less than useful to list tools twice. — 74.192.84.101 ( talk) 05:35, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Here are some tools that might be worth adding to the tables.
checklist used to search for possibilitiesMentioned on stackOverflow.
http://ifets.ieee.org/russian/depository/v13_i1/html/10.htm Master's thesis, 2010, Latvia. Appears to be published (with peer-review) as an IEEE conference-paper, but I don't grok the lingo, so I'm not positive here. Major and minor tools, FLOSS, used by a much wider variety of projects than the fancy payware (and often complementary but also competitive with the corp stuff).
Selenium , seleniumhq- Grinder , sf.net
- NUnit , .org / JUnit , .org / CUnit , sf.net / CppUnit , sf.net / HttpUnit , sf.net
- cPAMIE aka PAMIE aka Pamie , sf.net
- Abbot , sf.net
- TestNG .org
- OpenSTA , opensta .org (( category: load-testing tools ))
Products from major corporations, which typically bought out some smaller company that created the product originally. IBM/HP/Borland +
Oracle.
Rational robotand IBM Rational Performance Tester or Rational Performance Tester andIBM Rational Functional Tester , IBM fka Rational Software... JMeter , Apache Software Foundation slash IBM- HP LoadRunner and
QuickTest Professionaland Business Process Testing ,HPSilkTestand SilkPerformer ,Borland...TestPartnerand QALoad ,microfocus aka MicroFocus- Oracle Load Testing and Oracle Functional Testing ,
Oracle...Jemmy , unofficial Oracle fka Sun MicrosystemsNiche products and new startups and similar.
- WebTest , Canoo
- MessageMagic aka messagemagic , Elvior
- OpenTTCN , openttcn
QF-Test aka qftest , QFS aka qfsTestComplete , smartbear fka automatedqa- WAPT or wapt , loadtestingtool
TOSCA or Tosca , TRICENTIS or Tricentishttp://bauhaus.cs.uni-magdeburg.de:8080/miscms.nsf/FEA8C8150500AA14C1257449004F79A9/D01B44988A710A28C1257AA000304EE7/$FILE/Bachelorarbeit%20Philipp%20Ernst.pdf hundred-plus-page "bachelor" thesis, 2012, Germany... note that this might actually be a higher-level degree, Germany has a bit of an odd naming-system for the educational setup. Listed a couple FLOSS tools, one from Mozilla.
Products from major corporations, which typically bought out some smaller company that created the product originally. IBM/HP/Borland + Siemens.
- IBM Rational Clear Quest or Rational Clear Quest or Clear Quest ,
IBM fka Rational Software- IBM Rational ClearQuest or Rational ClearQuest or ClearQuest ,
IBM fka Rational Software- HP Quality Center ,
HP- SilkCentral ,
Micro Focus fka Borland- TEMPPO aka SiTEMPOO , Siemens
Niche products and new startups and similar.
- ApTest
- Aqua , Andagon
- Enterprise Tester or EnterpriseTester , Catch Limited
- TestBench , Imbus
- QPack or QPack ALM , Orcanos
- Polarion QA , Polarion
- PractiTest , practitest
- QABook , NMQA
QAComplete , SmartBear- SpiraTest , Inflectra
- TEST Professional , SQS aka Software_Quality_Systems_AG
- TestRail , Gurock or Gurock Software
- Testuff
- TestWave
- TOMOS , Reach Simplicity or ReachSimplicity or reachsimplicity
- Total Test Management , Qmetry
- Xstudio , Xqual
- Zephyr , Get Zephyr
TOSCA or Tosca , TRICENTIS or Tricentishttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-18701 , archive record at http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:613817 hundred-page master's thesis, 2013, sweden, Major and minor tools, FLOSS, used by a much wider variety of projects than the fancy payware (and often complementary but also competitive with the corp stuff).
Selenium , FLOSS (Apache2)Watir is an open–source testing tool based on Ruby libraries for automating the testing on web browsers. It is distributed under BSD licenseFitNesse , Robert C. Martin (CPL)Products from major corporations, which typically bought out some smaller company that created the product originally. IBM/HP/Borland +
Microsoft+National Instruments.
Rational robot and Rational Functional Tester , IBM- HP Unified Functional Testing (
QuickTest Pro+ HP Service Test) ,HPSilk Test and TestPartner , Micro FocusVisual Studio Test Pro , MicrosoftLabVIEW , National InstrumentsNiche products and new startups and similar.
AutoIt , Jonathan Bennett & AutoIt Consulting- Parasoft C/C++test and dotTEST ,
Parasoft- Certify (software) , Worksoft
eggPlant , TestPlantMaveryx,- NetAdvantage ,
Infragistics- QA Wizard or QA Wizard Pro , Seapine
- QT-Test ,
Quality First SoftwareRanoxer ,Squish , FroglogicTest Studio , TelerikTestComplete , SmartBear- TestDrive , Original Software
Testing Anywhere , Automation AnywhereTOSCA , Tricentis- T-Plan Robot , T-Plan
TPT , Piketec
HPIBMMicro Focus fka BorlandOracleMicrosoft (new)- ITKO or itko
- Soasta
- Worksoft
- CrossCheck Networks or CrossCheck (new)
Tricentis (new)Parasoft- Green Hat (software company)
- Original Software
- SmarteSoft
SmartBear fka AutomatedQA (new)- Seapine or Seapine Software
/info/en/?search=Category:Graphical_user_interface_testing
- Automated BuildStudio , SmartBear Software (( wrong category... this is a compilation-and-makefile-system automation-tool methinks ))
DogtailEggplant Functional- Fabasoft app.test , Fabasoft
GUIdancerHP QuickTest ProfessionalHP WinRunnerIBM Rational Functional TesterIcuTestJemmy frameworkMaveryxQAliberQF-TestRanorexRIATestSelenium (software)SikuliSilkTestSquish (Froglogic)Test Automation FXTest StudioTestCompleteTesting AnywhereTestPartnerTwist (software)- Visual Test by Microsoft/ Rational Software (from Category:Graphical_user_interface_testing), automated testing tool for Windows apps. (historical)
Watir- WET Web Tester
/info/en/?search=Category:Software_testing_tools
- Oracle Application Testing Suite
- Oracle Real Application Testing
- IBM Rational Quality Manager
- AscentialTest , Zeenyx_Software
/info/en/?search=Category:Load_testing_tools
- Parasoft Virtualize
- Visual Studio Application Lifecycle Management
- (several others... and no List of load testing tools either?)
/info/en/?search=List_of_web_testing_tools
iMacrosQF-TestRanorex- Sahi_(software)
SeleniumSOAtestTestCompleteTOSCA TestsuiteTest Studio- WatiN (redirect to Watir ... clone for dotnet)
Watir/info/en/?search=List_of_unit_testing_frameworks
Hope this helps.
74.192.84.101 (
talk)
05:35, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
I reverted your edit of the list of GUI testing tools. I see no reason that the list should not include a tool just because there is no corresponding article for it. It's a real tool with a real user community. I provided a link to the webpage and relevant information. Victorianist ( talk) 02:10, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
<!-- IF YOU DON'T PAY ATTENTION TO THIS MESSAGE, YOUR EDIT WILL BE ROLLED BACK WITHOUT WARNING. Only place entries here that are links to actual Wikipedia articles about notable GUI testing tools. External links, redlinks, non-notable sites will be removed. If you have questions, use the talk page. Please try to keep entries in alphabetical order. Adding unnecessary links or text to any other section (such as the "References" section) will also be removed. Thanks. -->
This article has been nominated for deletion before, in 2007 and the consensus at that time was that it should be deleted. The "criteria" of notability proposed in the talk page and in hidden comments in the article itself is that that each link should point to an already existing article on Wikipedia, but this does not establish notability. The list contains red links and none of the listed items points to verifiable sources or to sources that establish notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victorianist ( talk • contribs) 04:30, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
I'm trying to get Sikuli in the list. I tried to add an article so it wouldn't be rejected here, but I noticed lots of people are having trouble getting an article created due to Wiki's "notability" policy. Sikuli's a pretty significant tool to be missing from the list, notwithstanding all this pedantic procedural stuff. I've consulted at a number of Fortune 100 companies, and lots of them are using it. -- Jrounceville ( talk) 22:28, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
This article should not be speedy deleted as having no substantive content, because... it is useful — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.194.230.26 ( talk) 20:38, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Agreed, this article is useful. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.35.35.40 ( talk) 13:50, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
I came here because I have been doing research for my company on tools like these, but there are several tools on here now that are either only loosely related to GUIs, or not related at all. For example Ascentialtest is one. It is a regression testing tool as far as I can see, which has nothing to do with GUIs. There is also several web testing tools, where while web pages are GUIs, perhaps they should have their own category and list with a link to it at the bottom of this. e.g. "If you're looking for web testing tools, there is a list here:" After all, if you are looking for general GUI testing tools, a Web testing tool just doesn't cut it.
Just some feedback from me. I just had to make an account now, so I'll leave it to someone else in case people think I just came in here to troll. ChthonicOne ( talk) 19:15, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Would BrowserStack be valid? Richardc020 ( talk) 16:20, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Playwright and Cypress. 41.116.30.233 ( talk) 19:59, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 2 August 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This article is not a linkfarm. Before adding products to the list, make sure they are notable by having their own article. If not, try writing the article first. |
I don't think JUnit really belongs in this list. Regards, Ben Aveling 03:17, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Eggplant needs to stay on this list. It's been around longer than Ranorex, and has more users. It's an important tool that needs to be in every tester's tool box. I've been using a combination of tools including Eggplant since about 2003. Ajfisher2 ( talk) 22:30, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Putting Ranorex and Eggpalnt back. Creating a list based solely on number of users is a truly stupid criteria. It would be like me being paid solely for the number of bugs I find. There are many other things that should be considered when posting a tool besides number of users. Approach to the problem, technologies supported, licensing, cost, skill required of the tester...these are all things that are things I consider when adding a tool to my toolbox. By removing Eggplant, for example, you've removed half the tools on the list that support Mac OS. Are you a tester? I don't think you are, or else you would understand this.
So how many users does a tool need to have? My understanding of wikipedia is to provide information. I was trying to provide some. There is a link encouraging the expansion of this list. I'm going to remove that link because it's all about YOUR opinion of the list since it's impossible to add anything without you removing it and dismissing it out of hand. I have 3 or 4 tools that I would like to add in addition to Eggplant, but now I'm not because you've successfully made it a complete waste of time.
Eggplant certainly is a different tool, it works much, much differently than the rest of the tools on this list...which is why I thought it important to add. I hate to burst your bubble, but most of the tools here are listed for advertising purposes. It does things differently, so I thought it important. If you're so hell bent on removing tools because they don't have as many users as your tool of choice, you might as well just remove everything except QTP and RFT. Ajfisher2 ( talk) 14:34, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
OK. I've put up a page for Eggplant. I also do not see anything on WP:Links that qualifies removal. But I will do the extra work. I think notable should include, in addition to the points mentioned above, maturity, and approaches that are outside what you might call "standard" for GUI tools. All the tools on that list use gray-box testing. Eggplant is a blackbox tool, and has a decent user base. Ajfisher2 ( talk) 20:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
I am reminded that this list should not contain external links by WP:NOTLINKFARM. Externally linked articles will be removed.
A list for GUI testing tools is also available here http://www.testingfaqs.org/t-gui.html. Maybe somebody wants to add a tool at this article's list. I would like to, but I have no time! 194.219.52.200 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:19, 14 July 2010 (UTC).
I was wondering if you can include QAliber to the list, it is an open source project at sourceforge ( http://sourceforge.net/projects/qaliber/)
Please let me know what do you think, Regards, Benny —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.90.236.138 ( talk) 13:35, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
This page would benefit from a table with attributes such as
Hi Walter,
I added a and open source GUI testing tool called VANGA. I am a contributor to the project. Why did you roll back my adition?
Thanks,
Tervel — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.108.170.8 ( talk) 15:22, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
In the table Open Source GUI testing tools some rows have an entry "Example".
Is this filler text that should be removed?
JamesThomasMoon1979
03:31, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Currently the article has FLOSS tools for GUI test, proprietary tools for GUI test, and a mixed table for test-automation. Can we split the third table, to give us four tables, and consistency? :-)
My other suggestion is a bit more invasive; there are many names listed under GUI test, and also under test automation; should we just make a checkmark-column, so that we can show which GUI test tools also support test automation? It seems less than useful to list tools twice. — 74.192.84.101 ( talk) 05:35, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Here are some tools that might be worth adding to the tables.
checklist used to search for possibilitiesMentioned on stackOverflow.
http://ifets.ieee.org/russian/depository/v13_i1/html/10.htm Master's thesis, 2010, Latvia. Appears to be published (with peer-review) as an IEEE conference-paper, but I don't grok the lingo, so I'm not positive here. Major and minor tools, FLOSS, used by a much wider variety of projects than the fancy payware (and often complementary but also competitive with the corp stuff).
Selenium , seleniumhq- Grinder , sf.net
- NUnit , .org / JUnit , .org / CUnit , sf.net / CppUnit , sf.net / HttpUnit , sf.net
- cPAMIE aka PAMIE aka Pamie , sf.net
- Abbot , sf.net
- TestNG .org
- OpenSTA , opensta .org (( category: load-testing tools ))
Products from major corporations, which typically bought out some smaller company that created the product originally. IBM/HP/Borland +
Oracle.
Rational robotand IBM Rational Performance Tester or Rational Performance Tester andIBM Rational Functional Tester , IBM fka Rational Software... JMeter , Apache Software Foundation slash IBM- HP LoadRunner and
QuickTest Professionaland Business Process Testing ,HPSilkTestand SilkPerformer ,Borland...TestPartnerand QALoad ,microfocus aka MicroFocus- Oracle Load Testing and Oracle Functional Testing ,
Oracle...Jemmy , unofficial Oracle fka Sun MicrosystemsNiche products and new startups and similar.
- WebTest , Canoo
- MessageMagic aka messagemagic , Elvior
- OpenTTCN , openttcn
QF-Test aka qftest , QFS aka qfsTestComplete , smartbear fka automatedqa- WAPT or wapt , loadtestingtool
TOSCA or Tosca , TRICENTIS or Tricentishttp://bauhaus.cs.uni-magdeburg.de:8080/miscms.nsf/FEA8C8150500AA14C1257449004F79A9/D01B44988A710A28C1257AA000304EE7/$FILE/Bachelorarbeit%20Philipp%20Ernst.pdf hundred-plus-page "bachelor" thesis, 2012, Germany... note that this might actually be a higher-level degree, Germany has a bit of an odd naming-system for the educational setup. Listed a couple FLOSS tools, one from Mozilla.
Products from major corporations, which typically bought out some smaller company that created the product originally. IBM/HP/Borland + Siemens.
- IBM Rational Clear Quest or Rational Clear Quest or Clear Quest ,
IBM fka Rational Software- IBM Rational ClearQuest or Rational ClearQuest or ClearQuest ,
IBM fka Rational Software- HP Quality Center ,
HP- SilkCentral ,
Micro Focus fka Borland- TEMPPO aka SiTEMPOO , Siemens
Niche products and new startups and similar.
- ApTest
- Aqua , Andagon
- Enterprise Tester or EnterpriseTester , Catch Limited
- TestBench , Imbus
- QPack or QPack ALM , Orcanos
- Polarion QA , Polarion
- PractiTest , practitest
- QABook , NMQA
QAComplete , SmartBear- SpiraTest , Inflectra
- TEST Professional , SQS aka Software_Quality_Systems_AG
- TestRail , Gurock or Gurock Software
- Testuff
- TestWave
- TOMOS , Reach Simplicity or ReachSimplicity or reachsimplicity
- Total Test Management , Qmetry
- Xstudio , Xqual
- Zephyr , Get Zephyr
TOSCA or Tosca , TRICENTIS or Tricentishttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-18701 , archive record at http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:613817 hundred-page master's thesis, 2013, sweden, Major and minor tools, FLOSS, used by a much wider variety of projects than the fancy payware (and often complementary but also competitive with the corp stuff).
Selenium , FLOSS (Apache2)Watir is an open–source testing tool based on Ruby libraries for automating the testing on web browsers. It is distributed under BSD licenseFitNesse , Robert C. Martin (CPL)Products from major corporations, which typically bought out some smaller company that created the product originally. IBM/HP/Borland +
Microsoft+National Instruments.
Rational robot and Rational Functional Tester , IBM- HP Unified Functional Testing (
QuickTest Pro+ HP Service Test) ,HPSilk Test and TestPartner , Micro FocusVisual Studio Test Pro , MicrosoftLabVIEW , National InstrumentsNiche products and new startups and similar.
AutoIt , Jonathan Bennett & AutoIt Consulting- Parasoft C/C++test and dotTEST ,
Parasoft- Certify (software) , Worksoft
eggPlant , TestPlantMaveryx,- NetAdvantage ,
Infragistics- QA Wizard or QA Wizard Pro , Seapine
- QT-Test ,
Quality First SoftwareRanoxer ,Squish , FroglogicTest Studio , TelerikTestComplete , SmartBear- TestDrive , Original Software
Testing Anywhere , Automation AnywhereTOSCA , Tricentis- T-Plan Robot , T-Plan
TPT , Piketec
HPIBMMicro Focus fka BorlandOracleMicrosoft (new)- ITKO or itko
- Soasta
- Worksoft
- CrossCheck Networks or CrossCheck (new)
Tricentis (new)Parasoft- Green Hat (software company)
- Original Software
- SmarteSoft
SmartBear fka AutomatedQA (new)- Seapine or Seapine Software
/info/en/?search=Category:Graphical_user_interface_testing
- Automated BuildStudio , SmartBear Software (( wrong category... this is a compilation-and-makefile-system automation-tool methinks ))
DogtailEggplant Functional- Fabasoft app.test , Fabasoft
GUIdancerHP QuickTest ProfessionalHP WinRunnerIBM Rational Functional TesterIcuTestJemmy frameworkMaveryxQAliberQF-TestRanorexRIATestSelenium (software)SikuliSilkTestSquish (Froglogic)Test Automation FXTest StudioTestCompleteTesting AnywhereTestPartnerTwist (software)- Visual Test by Microsoft/ Rational Software (from Category:Graphical_user_interface_testing), automated testing tool for Windows apps. (historical)
Watir- WET Web Tester
/info/en/?search=Category:Software_testing_tools
- Oracle Application Testing Suite
- Oracle Real Application Testing
- IBM Rational Quality Manager
- AscentialTest , Zeenyx_Software
/info/en/?search=Category:Load_testing_tools
- Parasoft Virtualize
- Visual Studio Application Lifecycle Management
- (several others... and no List of load testing tools either?)
/info/en/?search=List_of_web_testing_tools
iMacrosQF-TestRanorex- Sahi_(software)
SeleniumSOAtestTestCompleteTOSCA TestsuiteTest Studio- WatiN (redirect to Watir ... clone for dotnet)
Watir/info/en/?search=List_of_unit_testing_frameworks
Hope this helps.
74.192.84.101 (
talk)
05:35, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
I reverted your edit of the list of GUI testing tools. I see no reason that the list should not include a tool just because there is no corresponding article for it. It's a real tool with a real user community. I provided a link to the webpage and relevant information. Victorianist ( talk) 02:10, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
<!-- IF YOU DON'T PAY ATTENTION TO THIS MESSAGE, YOUR EDIT WILL BE ROLLED BACK WITHOUT WARNING. Only place entries here that are links to actual Wikipedia articles about notable GUI testing tools. External links, redlinks, non-notable sites will be removed. If you have questions, use the talk page. Please try to keep entries in alphabetical order. Adding unnecessary links or text to any other section (such as the "References" section) will also be removed. Thanks. -->
This article has been nominated for deletion before, in 2007 and the consensus at that time was that it should be deleted. The "criteria" of notability proposed in the talk page and in hidden comments in the article itself is that that each link should point to an already existing article on Wikipedia, but this does not establish notability. The list contains red links and none of the listed items points to verifiable sources or to sources that establish notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victorianist ( talk • contribs) 04:30, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
I'm trying to get Sikuli in the list. I tried to add an article so it wouldn't be rejected here, but I noticed lots of people are having trouble getting an article created due to Wiki's "notability" policy. Sikuli's a pretty significant tool to be missing from the list, notwithstanding all this pedantic procedural stuff. I've consulted at a number of Fortune 100 companies, and lots of them are using it. -- Jrounceville ( talk) 22:28, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
This article should not be speedy deleted as having no substantive content, because... it is useful — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.194.230.26 ( talk) 20:38, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Agreed, this article is useful. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.35.35.40 ( talk) 13:50, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
I came here because I have been doing research for my company on tools like these, but there are several tools on here now that are either only loosely related to GUIs, or not related at all. For example Ascentialtest is one. It is a regression testing tool as far as I can see, which has nothing to do with GUIs. There is also several web testing tools, where while web pages are GUIs, perhaps they should have their own category and list with a link to it at the bottom of this. e.g. "If you're looking for web testing tools, there is a list here:" After all, if you are looking for general GUI testing tools, a Web testing tool just doesn't cut it.
Just some feedback from me. I just had to make an account now, so I'll leave it to someone else in case people think I just came in here to troll. ChthonicOne ( talk) 19:15, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Would BrowserStack be valid? Richardc020 ( talk) 16:20, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Playwright and Cypress. 41.116.30.233 ( talk) 19:59, 15 October 2022 (UTC)