This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Comparative anatomy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 February 2022 and 20 May 2022. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Azyla.m (
article contribs).
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2019 and 5 December 2019. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Campbellmock.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 19:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Kushanna.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 18:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
what is bacteria morphology does ne1 kno pls help me i cant find anything specific on dat==Ghost Town== After reading the article doing some MUCH needed editing I realized how long It has been since anyone edited the page. Comparative Anatomy is seriously lacking in edits. By now I thought this article would have a lot more information or at LEAST some saboteurs or something! If anyone out there is interested, please contribute and I will help.
Chronospecies is a current candidate on Wikipedia:Science collaboration of the week. If you would like to see this article improved vote for it here. -- Fenice 17:48, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
Why no mention of Georges Cuvier, founding father of comparative anatomy and giant in the field (see the Wikipedia article on GC)? It's like discussing evolution without mentioning Darwin. 213.7.17.134 ( talk) 09:26, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
What sort of redirect page is this? Morphology => Comparative anatomy? That is a MESS! Berton 16:28, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
I'm suggestion merging comparative anatomy with comparative vertebrate anatomy, since the latter is even more of a stub than this, and a single page will be more than sufficient to explain the subject in detail. I'm going to completely re-write the page once the merge is complete. Mokele ( talk) 20:21, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
The introduction of Vesalius and his critique of Galen is rather abrupt - who are they and what is their connection to human anatomy. This is compounded by the disconnect with the previous paragraph; in fact, the time-line with the other material is confusing because your addition would have preceded the content mention in previous paragraphs. The format of the foot-note is very messy with the superscript and illogical line shift. I wonder if a University web site requires mention of all the members of the staff - not sure; however, the list could grow very long if all staff members have to be accounted for.-- JimmyButler ( talk) 16:08, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I used a citation generator and it asked for the coauthors. So I found the credits for the site and used all the names...I have also reordered the paragraphs to make more sense and expanded a bit more on Galen and Vesalius-- Artemis Gray ( talk) 23:48, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Have a look in the first picture in this page, the picture of the Dolphin and the Shark. take a close look at it's caption. what "Ogga Bogga Chicken Fart" has to do with anything here? I tried to take it out but can't find how. when you try to edit this part, you see that the caption is all right with no ogga's but when you view the article it does appear... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.203.197.196 ( talk) 15:30, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
I was a little confused about the article's description of the role of genomics in comparative anatomy. I think that this could be cleared up by adding a section on phylogeny and explaining that the trees are made up from genetic data, specifically conserved genes, but that the physical characteristics derived from anatomical structures is mapped onto those trees to show connections between organisms. [1] I think this is an important aspect because it clearly shows the relationships between species, which is a large part of comparative anatomy. [2] This addition could be expanded upon to list some of the larger groups that are commonly mentioned, like chordate for example. Another section could be on form and function that relates to the homologous and analogous definitions on the page. Hobbscassidy ( talk) 22:59, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
References
{{
cite book}}
: |access-date=
requires |url=
(
help)
{{
cite journal}}
: |access-date=
requires |url=
(
help)
I recently added a new citation in relation with phylogeny trees on how to read them and also how are they usually used with the study of Comparative Anatomy.
Blancapaola2 (
talk)
05:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
For the definition of Analogy, I suggest rephrasing the definition as follows: Analogous Structures - structures with similar functions between phylogenetically distinct organisms as a result of convergent evolution. An example is the streamlined torpedo body shape of porpoises and sharks, because while they both allow for faster locomotion through water, the porpoise and shark do not share a recent common ancestor. Also, for the definition of Homoplasy I would also recommend this change: Homoplastic structures - structures that look similar, are derived from convergent evolution, and the two organisms displaying homoplasy may or may not share a common ancestor. [1] Instead, they may have evolved in common environments and the traits arose due to natural selection.[4] This can be seen most prominently in species that have camouflage capabilities, like an insect that can look like a leaf, but has no photosynthetic capability. Theambivert20 ( talk) 20:46, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
References
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Comparative morphology. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 31#Comparative morphology until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Soumya-8974
talk
contribs
subpages
07:48, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Radiometric 66.220.183.182 ( talk) 01:59, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Comparative anatomy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 February 2022 and 20 May 2022. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Azyla.m (
article contribs).
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2019 and 5 December 2019. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Campbellmock.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 19:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Kushanna.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 18:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
what is bacteria morphology does ne1 kno pls help me i cant find anything specific on dat==Ghost Town== After reading the article doing some MUCH needed editing I realized how long It has been since anyone edited the page. Comparative Anatomy is seriously lacking in edits. By now I thought this article would have a lot more information or at LEAST some saboteurs or something! If anyone out there is interested, please contribute and I will help.
Chronospecies is a current candidate on Wikipedia:Science collaboration of the week. If you would like to see this article improved vote for it here. -- Fenice 17:48, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
Why no mention of Georges Cuvier, founding father of comparative anatomy and giant in the field (see the Wikipedia article on GC)? It's like discussing evolution without mentioning Darwin. 213.7.17.134 ( talk) 09:26, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
What sort of redirect page is this? Morphology => Comparative anatomy? That is a MESS! Berton 16:28, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
I'm suggestion merging comparative anatomy with comparative vertebrate anatomy, since the latter is even more of a stub than this, and a single page will be more than sufficient to explain the subject in detail. I'm going to completely re-write the page once the merge is complete. Mokele ( talk) 20:21, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
The introduction of Vesalius and his critique of Galen is rather abrupt - who are they and what is their connection to human anatomy. This is compounded by the disconnect with the previous paragraph; in fact, the time-line with the other material is confusing because your addition would have preceded the content mention in previous paragraphs. The format of the foot-note is very messy with the superscript and illogical line shift. I wonder if a University web site requires mention of all the members of the staff - not sure; however, the list could grow very long if all staff members have to be accounted for.-- JimmyButler ( talk) 16:08, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I used a citation generator and it asked for the coauthors. So I found the credits for the site and used all the names...I have also reordered the paragraphs to make more sense and expanded a bit more on Galen and Vesalius-- Artemis Gray ( talk) 23:48, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Have a look in the first picture in this page, the picture of the Dolphin and the Shark. take a close look at it's caption. what "Ogga Bogga Chicken Fart" has to do with anything here? I tried to take it out but can't find how. when you try to edit this part, you see that the caption is all right with no ogga's but when you view the article it does appear... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.203.197.196 ( talk) 15:30, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
I was a little confused about the article's description of the role of genomics in comparative anatomy. I think that this could be cleared up by adding a section on phylogeny and explaining that the trees are made up from genetic data, specifically conserved genes, but that the physical characteristics derived from anatomical structures is mapped onto those trees to show connections between organisms. [1] I think this is an important aspect because it clearly shows the relationships between species, which is a large part of comparative anatomy. [2] This addition could be expanded upon to list some of the larger groups that are commonly mentioned, like chordate for example. Another section could be on form and function that relates to the homologous and analogous definitions on the page. Hobbscassidy ( talk) 22:59, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
References
{{
cite book}}
: |access-date=
requires |url=
(
help)
{{
cite journal}}
: |access-date=
requires |url=
(
help)
I recently added a new citation in relation with phylogeny trees on how to read them and also how are they usually used with the study of Comparative Anatomy.
Blancapaola2 (
talk)
05:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
For the definition of Analogy, I suggest rephrasing the definition as follows: Analogous Structures - structures with similar functions between phylogenetically distinct organisms as a result of convergent evolution. An example is the streamlined torpedo body shape of porpoises and sharks, because while they both allow for faster locomotion through water, the porpoise and shark do not share a recent common ancestor. Also, for the definition of Homoplasy I would also recommend this change: Homoplastic structures - structures that look similar, are derived from convergent evolution, and the two organisms displaying homoplasy may or may not share a common ancestor. [1] Instead, they may have evolved in common environments and the traits arose due to natural selection.[4] This can be seen most prominently in species that have camouflage capabilities, like an insect that can look like a leaf, but has no photosynthetic capability. Theambivert20 ( talk) 20:46, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
References
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Comparative morphology. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 31#Comparative morphology until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Soumya-8974
talk
contribs
subpages
07:48, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Radiometric 66.220.183.182 ( talk) 01:59, 12 February 2024 (UTC)