This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Committee to Protect Journalists article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
tibetibet wrote:
Re: According to CPJ figures, at least 45 journalists and 20 media support workers have been killed in 2005 by coalition troops while covering the war in Iraq.
This is factually incorrect. The correct total is 13 ( http://www.cpj.org/Briefings/Iraq/Js_killed_by_US_13sept05.html).
Ethopia crisis is different.It should come in an Ethopia article .CPJ just issues statements .It has nothing to do with the problems in Ethopia and hence removing the Ethopia section. 193.61.107.150 18:16, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Image:CPJ.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 07:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I just removed some text from this section because it seems to be WP:COATRACK overspill from the Murder of Meredith Kercher article.
More generally, though, this section seems to rely heavily on the CPJ site. Since CPJ seems to highlight a number of cases on its site each day, what is the rationale for choosing a select few for inclusion in this section? -- FormerIP ( talk) 00:38, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
...missing. Sure there is enough controversial facts to find and add, so it's strange the section is not written yet.-- 213.208.170.194 ( talk) 07:39, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Committee to Protect Journalists article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
tibetibet wrote:
Re: According to CPJ figures, at least 45 journalists and 20 media support workers have been killed in 2005 by coalition troops while covering the war in Iraq.
This is factually incorrect. The correct total is 13 ( http://www.cpj.org/Briefings/Iraq/Js_killed_by_US_13sept05.html).
Ethopia crisis is different.It should come in an Ethopia article .CPJ just issues statements .It has nothing to do with the problems in Ethopia and hence removing the Ethopia section. 193.61.107.150 18:16, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Image:CPJ.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 07:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I just removed some text from this section because it seems to be WP:COATRACK overspill from the Murder of Meredith Kercher article.
More generally, though, this section seems to rely heavily on the CPJ site. Since CPJ seems to highlight a number of cases on its site each day, what is the rationale for choosing a select few for inclusion in this section? -- FormerIP ( talk) 00:38, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
...missing. Sure there is enough controversial facts to find and add, so it's strange the section is not written yet.-- 213.208.170.194 ( talk) 07:39, 12 April 2013 (UTC)