This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Numismatics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Poland Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

While adding market values based on Polish Numismatic Society's publication ^[1] I found that in the publication, the quantity of the some coins differes from the offical values. It is probably error in print in the publication, but I've decided to put both numbers in the articles.

Kupsztal ( talk) 23:20, 8 January 2009 (UTC) reply

Wow Kupsztal, Well done, you have put a huge amount of work and effort into this article, adding in both quantities and referencing them is a great idea since official sources can sometimes be wrong. Kevin hipwell ( talk) 11:34, 9 January 2009 (UTC) reply

1995 not created

1996 not created

1997 not created

1998 finished

1999 finished

2000 finished

2001 text finished, need to add 5 photos

2002 finished

2003 not created (0/16)

2004 created (1/19), photos (0/19)

2005 created (6/22), photos (5/22)

2006 finished

2007 finished

2008 finished

2009 finished

2010 open for current issues (1/9)

I am no planning to update any more articles after all the images have been removed, which I think was - simply put - ridiculous. I don't see the point any more.

Kupsztal ( talk) 18:43, 31 August 2011 (UTC) reply

• The point is here. If you don't want "to develop educational content under a free license or in the public domain, and to disseminate it effectively and globally", that's fine. You certainly don't have to. However, I would hope that you'd be willing to share your expertise on this subject despite running into issues with the use of images that contradict that mission. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 20:10, 31 August 2011 (UTC) reply

• Thing is, I wasn't violating the Mission. All images fulfilled the requirements given by the issuer: http://www.nbp.pl/homen.aspx?f=/en/banknoty/wykorzystanie_wizerunkow_en.html , and I haven't been given time to explain this before the images were deleted. Kupsztal ( talk) 12:41, 9 January 2017 (UTC) reply