![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
A similar technique is used by printer makers, see eff.org for more info. I think this should be mensioned - Yosef. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.0.136.14 ( talk • contribs) 10:50, 19 June 2006
I have removed this link from the article
While I 100% agree with the assestment, and these dots piss me off to no end, I really don't feel that it's fair to provide that sort of link. It's a rant regarding how bad they are, and it's a point of view.-- Robert Stone, Jr. 23:37, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
In rev. 117756913 [1] (14:41, 25 March 2007 Guyjohnston ( Talk | contribs) (Removed biased terms "piracy" and "pirated")) there's the implication that "piracy" and "pirated" are biased terms. What's the justification? Sure, they have a negative connotation, but so does "illegal." And indeed, there's a reason for that. I'm reverting the revision, because it's at least partially inaccurate. CAP does not "make it more difficult to make illegal copies of motion pictures," it enhances tracability of such copies. jhawkinson 17:37, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
According to the posts I've read at film-tech.com (which provided the bulk of the information for this article when I originally started it), Kodak's CAP has never been placed in the frames of the print, this was how it was designed from the get-go. This is according to a poster on film-tech.com who is an engineer with Kodak (IIRC), John Pytlak, who had a hand in developing Kodak's CAP. He mentioned in a post that it was compeltely different and not in-frame like the more intrusive Deluxe version. Therefore, I'll change the Kodak CAP section of this article accordingly.
Here's the thread if you don't believe me:
http://www.film-tech.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=005347#000003 (apparently, film-tech.com's
UBB.threads forum software doesn't like/allow links to forum threads (redirecting such links to its main page), just go to the forums directly, and search for the thread titled "MPAA, you suck!")
misternuvistor 06:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
The patent application for CAP is available online at http://www.freepatentsonline.com/20040109016.html
Is that a credible reference for this article? Wikipedia XP 21:04, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
That thing about The Simpsons isnt true, is it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.43.236.166 ( talk) 11:32, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Coded anti-piracy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:59, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 05:07, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
A similar technique is used by printer makers, see eff.org for more info. I think this should be mensioned - Yosef. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.0.136.14 ( talk • contribs) 10:50, 19 June 2006
I have removed this link from the article
While I 100% agree with the assestment, and these dots piss me off to no end, I really don't feel that it's fair to provide that sort of link. It's a rant regarding how bad they are, and it's a point of view.-- Robert Stone, Jr. 23:37, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
In rev. 117756913 [1] (14:41, 25 March 2007 Guyjohnston ( Talk | contribs) (Removed biased terms "piracy" and "pirated")) there's the implication that "piracy" and "pirated" are biased terms. What's the justification? Sure, they have a negative connotation, but so does "illegal." And indeed, there's a reason for that. I'm reverting the revision, because it's at least partially inaccurate. CAP does not "make it more difficult to make illegal copies of motion pictures," it enhances tracability of such copies. jhawkinson 17:37, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
According to the posts I've read at film-tech.com (which provided the bulk of the information for this article when I originally started it), Kodak's CAP has never been placed in the frames of the print, this was how it was designed from the get-go. This is according to a poster on film-tech.com who is an engineer with Kodak (IIRC), John Pytlak, who had a hand in developing Kodak's CAP. He mentioned in a post that it was compeltely different and not in-frame like the more intrusive Deluxe version. Therefore, I'll change the Kodak CAP section of this article accordingly.
Here's the thread if you don't believe me:
http://www.film-tech.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=005347#000003 (apparently, film-tech.com's
UBB.threads forum software doesn't like/allow links to forum threads (redirecting such links to its main page), just go to the forums directly, and search for the thread titled "MPAA, you suck!")
misternuvistor 06:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
The patent application for CAP is available online at http://www.freepatentsonline.com/20040109016.html
Is that a credible reference for this article? Wikipedia XP 21:04, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
That thing about The Simpsons isnt true, is it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.43.236.166 ( talk) 11:32, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Coded anti-piracy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:59, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 05:07, 2 July 2020 (UTC)