![]() |
Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been
mentioned by a media organization:
|
Cock rings are hardly a modern invention, and there's archeological evidence of the use of similar devices in ancient Rome and Egypt. If people could please help expand the article with proper sources. I will attempt to do so myself later in the month when I have time. 24.190.34.219 ( talk) 01:38, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Penile constriction devices: case report, review of the literature, and recommendations for extrication. -- Banjeboi 20:01, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Copied from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine#Cock ring:
Hidee ho!, I was doing a bit of clean-up at cock ring and was hoping someone could take a peek to see if we are okay with the medical bits presented there? Mucho appreciato! -- Banjeboi 16:46, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
The article would be more complete with a section on similar rings used in management of livestock breeding males. I have seen them in use on bulls, and read of their use on horses. They are sometimes known as spermatorrheal rings. Looking for mention of them here, I came across a content fork: Spermatorrhoea and Spermatorrhea. -- Una Smith ( talk) 19:42, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
I have just removed from the article the sentence "Similar rings used in management of livestock breeding males are sometimes known as spermatorrheal rings". Spermatorrheal rings were (are) medical devices used not only on livestock but also on boys and men. Some are even patented. See Google Books for several reliable sources. -- Una Smith ( talk) 16:54, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Couldn't we find a picture of one of these that isn't covered with pubic hairs? JJBottero ( talk) 20:48, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello Rsrikanth05,
I made a minor addition to this article, section "recreational" to make explicit that cock rings are used both in a heterosexual and homosexual intercourse context. Added "female or male" in the sentence below:
A cock ring may be used to prolong erection in order to provide a female or male partner with pleasure [...]
I see that you have reverted this edit. May I ask why?
Best regards
Careful2014 (
talk)
13:29, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
I've been looking at the structure and content of this page and think that: the structure is confusing in that it does not read is a meaningful order to me, and the content has several repetitions in it. The structure is currently:
1 Motivations 1.1 Medical 1.2 Recreational 2 Use 3 Variations 4 Risks 4.1 Medical issues 5 Materials and types 5.1 Specialized underwear 6 See also 7 References 8 External links
I'm proposing to change this to:
1 Types 2 Uses 2.1 Recreational 2.2 Medical 3 Wearing 3.1 Benefits 3.2 Risks 4 Size 5 Putting one on 6 Specialized underwear 7 See also 8 References 9 External links
I noticed Motivations being used as a section term on other pages. Is this something North American or Wiki Style or … Does anybody have any comments/advice? 86.133.193.173 ( talk) 21:53, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
I want an explanation of why it's sometimes called a "Arab Strap" , arabs don't do sexual intercourse at all! Egyptio ( talk) 18:53, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
I fixed it , so now it's resolved. Egyptio ( talk) 19:08, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
But i still want an explanation. Egyptio ( talk) 19:08, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
arabs don't do sexual intercourse at allis absurd. Arabs do have sexual intercourse and that is why Arab babies are born. It can be difficult to track the origins of a slang term, but a simple Google search shows that this is an actual slang term. Cullen328 ( talk) 19:20, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been
mentioned by a media organization:
|
Cock rings are hardly a modern invention, and there's archeological evidence of the use of similar devices in ancient Rome and Egypt. If people could please help expand the article with proper sources. I will attempt to do so myself later in the month when I have time. 24.190.34.219 ( talk) 01:38, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Penile constriction devices: case report, review of the literature, and recommendations for extrication. -- Banjeboi 20:01, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Copied from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine#Cock ring:
Hidee ho!, I was doing a bit of clean-up at cock ring and was hoping someone could take a peek to see if we are okay with the medical bits presented there? Mucho appreciato! -- Banjeboi 16:46, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
The article would be more complete with a section on similar rings used in management of livestock breeding males. I have seen them in use on bulls, and read of their use on horses. They are sometimes known as spermatorrheal rings. Looking for mention of them here, I came across a content fork: Spermatorrhoea and Spermatorrhea. -- Una Smith ( talk) 19:42, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
I have just removed from the article the sentence "Similar rings used in management of livestock breeding males are sometimes known as spermatorrheal rings". Spermatorrheal rings were (are) medical devices used not only on livestock but also on boys and men. Some are even patented. See Google Books for several reliable sources. -- Una Smith ( talk) 16:54, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Couldn't we find a picture of one of these that isn't covered with pubic hairs? JJBottero ( talk) 20:48, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello Rsrikanth05,
I made a minor addition to this article, section "recreational" to make explicit that cock rings are used both in a heterosexual and homosexual intercourse context. Added "female or male" in the sentence below:
A cock ring may be used to prolong erection in order to provide a female or male partner with pleasure [...]
I see that you have reverted this edit. May I ask why?
Best regards
Careful2014 (
talk)
13:29, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
I've been looking at the structure and content of this page and think that: the structure is confusing in that it does not read is a meaningful order to me, and the content has several repetitions in it. The structure is currently:
1 Motivations 1.1 Medical 1.2 Recreational 2 Use 3 Variations 4 Risks 4.1 Medical issues 5 Materials and types 5.1 Specialized underwear 6 See also 7 References 8 External links
I'm proposing to change this to:
1 Types 2 Uses 2.1 Recreational 2.2 Medical 3 Wearing 3.1 Benefits 3.2 Risks 4 Size 5 Putting one on 6 Specialized underwear 7 See also 8 References 9 External links
I noticed Motivations being used as a section term on other pages. Is this something North American or Wiki Style or … Does anybody have any comments/advice? 86.133.193.173 ( talk) 21:53, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
I want an explanation of why it's sometimes called a "Arab Strap" , arabs don't do sexual intercourse at all! Egyptio ( talk) 18:53, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
I fixed it , so now it's resolved. Egyptio ( talk) 19:08, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
But i still want an explanation. Egyptio ( talk) 19:08, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
arabs don't do sexual intercourse at allis absurd. Arabs do have sexual intercourse and that is why Arab babies are born. It can be difficult to track the origins of a slang term, but a simple Google search shows that this is an actual slang term. Cullen328 ( talk) 19:20, 25 November 2022 (UTC)