![]() | Rich Hickey was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 27 July 2011 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Clojure. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I'm having trouble finding 3rd party references about the language that are not either directly from or one-step-removed-from Rich Hickey (the language creator) which would violate the "no original research" doctrine? Where can I find other references to this language Derarthur ( talk) 23:37, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
When the article grows, you can link to Clojure's list comprehension example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_comprehension#Clojure —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.138.105.130 ( talk) 19:33, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Mark Volkmann's article is a great starting point to expand this wiki article in the same format as other programming language articles: http://ociweb.com/jnb/jnbMar2009.html 217.132.53.109 ( talk) 11:07, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Is it like 'clojure' or 'cloyure' or 'clohure' or 'clozhure'? —Preceding unsigned comment added by OsamaBinLogin ( talk • contribs) 16:47, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
The newsgroup states that Clojure birthday was on 16th October 2007. Should the "Appeared in" mention the specific date? 93.172.131.46 ( talk) 14:38, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
This example is missing a bracket.
(let [vec-refs (vec (map (comp ref vec) (partition nitems (range (* nvecs nitems))))) swap #(let [v1 (rand-int nvecs) v2 (rand-int nvecs) i1 (rand-int nitems) i2 (rand-int nitems)]
-- 68.161.111.143 ( talk) 18:48, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
The example is correct; it works in Clojure 1.2. 72.177.114.33 ( talk) 21:43, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia's deletionists somehow reached the bewildering conclusion from this page that consensus is Rich Hickey is not notable and should be deleted. I'm too old for internet politics. I give up.
Here's the salvage from Rich Hickey's original page:
Rich Hickey continues to produce interesting ideas and implementations, including Datomic and Codeq. He really should have his own article, folks! RichMorin ( talk) 00:52, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Rich Hickey's article being deleted really illuminates a larger problem on Wikipedia, look at the discussion for deletion linked above. There is a single user, Artem Karimov, arguing for deletion and every other person in the discussion voted to Keep the article. Yet because this one person made it their life to argue with and respond to everyone who disagreed with him, he made sure the article got deleted. Disgusting. 173.68.18.98 ( talk) 16:08, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Why is compojure listed in the variants section?
I think we should make a clear distinction between official variants (ClojureCLR, ClojureScript) and unofficial ones, like las3r and Clojure-Py.
-- Ivant ( talk) 07:54, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Clojure is not pure functional, but that doesn't sufficiently make it a "multi-paradigm" one.
Any objections?
Also See:
-- Crlf0710 ( talk) 06:31, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
User TvojaStara added a remark of Steve Yegge about the Clojure community as criticism on Clojure: https://sites.google.com/site/steveyegge2/ten-predictions He also claims that Yegge is/was a Clojure evangelist and that he can be found by searching on Google for 'clojure criticism'. I think that's all not noteworthy as criticism in a Wikipedia entry for the Clojure programming language. For a slightly better example of programming language criticisms compare the Wikipedia page on Criticism of Java. Yegge's role as 'Clojure evangelist' is unclear. He wrote a foreword to a Clojure book. Other than that he is known for writing 'rants' on various topics. The remark by Yegge provides an opinion, but no further information on what he bases this opinion. Yegge writes: 'but they're fairly user-hostile'. The factual basis of this remark is completely unclear. Joswig ( talk) 22:18, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Clojure. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 19:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Is there a reason why Clojure doesn't include "(programming language)" like most other programming language articles do? I'm referring to Go (programming language), Haskell (programming language), Erlang (programming language), Rust (programming language), Julia (programming language), Scala (programming language), etc. MarkN ( talk) 19:41, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
The history section doesn't give any dates. It would be much more informative with dates in my opinion. The "Language Overview" section does, but one reading the history section wouldn't know this. Perhaps they can be merged somehow. -Anonymous — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.233.255.213 ( talk) 19:22, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
There is a standard library part which resembles prolog but I can't find other similarities. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.29.55.159 ( talk) 20:19, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() | Rich Hickey was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 27 July 2011 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Clojure. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I'm having trouble finding 3rd party references about the language that are not either directly from or one-step-removed-from Rich Hickey (the language creator) which would violate the "no original research" doctrine? Where can I find other references to this language Derarthur ( talk) 23:37, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
When the article grows, you can link to Clojure's list comprehension example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_comprehension#Clojure —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.138.105.130 ( talk) 19:33, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Mark Volkmann's article is a great starting point to expand this wiki article in the same format as other programming language articles: http://ociweb.com/jnb/jnbMar2009.html 217.132.53.109 ( talk) 11:07, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Is it like 'clojure' or 'cloyure' or 'clohure' or 'clozhure'? —Preceding unsigned comment added by OsamaBinLogin ( talk • contribs) 16:47, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
The newsgroup states that Clojure birthday was on 16th October 2007. Should the "Appeared in" mention the specific date? 93.172.131.46 ( talk) 14:38, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
This example is missing a bracket.
(let [vec-refs (vec (map (comp ref vec) (partition nitems (range (* nvecs nitems))))) swap #(let [v1 (rand-int nvecs) v2 (rand-int nvecs) i1 (rand-int nitems) i2 (rand-int nitems)]
-- 68.161.111.143 ( talk) 18:48, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
The example is correct; it works in Clojure 1.2. 72.177.114.33 ( talk) 21:43, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia's deletionists somehow reached the bewildering conclusion from this page that consensus is Rich Hickey is not notable and should be deleted. I'm too old for internet politics. I give up.
Here's the salvage from Rich Hickey's original page:
Rich Hickey continues to produce interesting ideas and implementations, including Datomic and Codeq. He really should have his own article, folks! RichMorin ( talk) 00:52, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Rich Hickey's article being deleted really illuminates a larger problem on Wikipedia, look at the discussion for deletion linked above. There is a single user, Artem Karimov, arguing for deletion and every other person in the discussion voted to Keep the article. Yet because this one person made it their life to argue with and respond to everyone who disagreed with him, he made sure the article got deleted. Disgusting. 173.68.18.98 ( talk) 16:08, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Why is compojure listed in the variants section?
I think we should make a clear distinction between official variants (ClojureCLR, ClojureScript) and unofficial ones, like las3r and Clojure-Py.
-- Ivant ( talk) 07:54, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Clojure is not pure functional, but that doesn't sufficiently make it a "multi-paradigm" one.
Any objections?
Also See:
-- Crlf0710 ( talk) 06:31, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
User TvojaStara added a remark of Steve Yegge about the Clojure community as criticism on Clojure: https://sites.google.com/site/steveyegge2/ten-predictions He also claims that Yegge is/was a Clojure evangelist and that he can be found by searching on Google for 'clojure criticism'. I think that's all not noteworthy as criticism in a Wikipedia entry for the Clojure programming language. For a slightly better example of programming language criticisms compare the Wikipedia page on Criticism of Java. Yegge's role as 'Clojure evangelist' is unclear. He wrote a foreword to a Clojure book. Other than that he is known for writing 'rants' on various topics. The remark by Yegge provides an opinion, but no further information on what he bases this opinion. Yegge writes: 'but they're fairly user-hostile'. The factual basis of this remark is completely unclear. Joswig ( talk) 22:18, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Clojure. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 19:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Is there a reason why Clojure doesn't include "(programming language)" like most other programming language articles do? I'm referring to Go (programming language), Haskell (programming language), Erlang (programming language), Rust (programming language), Julia (programming language), Scala (programming language), etc. MarkN ( talk) 19:41, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
The history section doesn't give any dates. It would be much more informative with dates in my opinion. The "Language Overview" section does, but one reading the history section wouldn't know this. Perhaps they can be merged somehow. -Anonymous — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.233.255.213 ( talk) 19:22, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
There is a standard library part which resembles prolog but I can't find other similarities. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.29.55.159 ( talk) 20:19, 9 January 2021 (UTC)