Ciutat Morta has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 21, 2021. ( Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Spain Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Film This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles Anarchism This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism articles   Anarchism WikiProject open tasks watch · · history · talk · purge Recognized content · Drafts & requests · Subscribe · Member list · Resources · How can I help? 🚨🚨 Join our ongoing cleanup drive for 2024 – all are invited 🚨🚨 Did you know 24 Jun 2024 – Wong Sau Ying ( talk ·   ·  hist) was nominated for DYK by Grnrchst ( t ·  c); see discussion Articles for deletion 09 Jul 2024 – International Anarchist Congresses ( talk ·   ·  hist) was AfDed by Grnrchst ( t ·  c); see discussion (2 participants; relisted) Good article nominees 20 Jun 2024 – Sophie Kropotkin ( talk ·   ·  hist) was GA nominated by Grnrchst ( t ·  c); start discussion 14 May 2024 – Makhnovshchina ( talk ·   ·  hist) was GA nominated by Grnrchst ( t ·  c); start discussion 03 May 2024 – Mariano R. Vázquez ( talk ·   ·  hist) was GA nominated by Grnrchst ( t ·  c); start discussion 15 Apr 2024 – Anarchism without adjectives ( talk ·   ·  hist) was GA nominated by Grnrchst ( t ·  c); start discussion Articles for creation 08 May 2024 – Draft:Donat Cherepanov ( talk ·   ·  hist) has been submitted for AfC by Speedymagoo ( t ·  c) Cleanup (104) · Potentially related articles · Recent edits · Recent Commons images · Stub expansion project (519) Squatting Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Squatting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of squatting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SquattingWikipedia:WikiProject SquattingTemplate:WikiProject Squattingsquatting articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ciutat Morta/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk · contribs) 20:20, 18 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 20:20, 18 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the review so far, the article is improved for it. I've answered everything with some queries, see what you think. Mujinga ( talk) 11:51, 20 March 2021 (UTC) reply

re "expanding #Production to meet the third criteria" I added some lines yesterday and I've added some more today from the last review I found. I've also put in the academic analysis that was previously in further reading. I don't think this film will ever have a production section the size of say Blade Runner 2049, I'm happy the main aspects are covered. Back to you, thanks! Mujinga ( talk) 11:38, 21 March 2021 (UTC) reply

• Improve the non-free use rationale for the poster with this template.

•  Done Mujinga ( talk) 10:02, 20 March 2021 (UTC) reply

• "Poster" → "Promotional release poster"

•  Done Mujinga ( talk) 10:02, 20 March 2021 (UTC) reply

• Don't use "<br />" in the infobox. Use " plainlist" instead.

• is this a MOS issue? Mujinga ( talk) 10:02, 20 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Well, it says on the film infobox template that plainlist is preferred, and it also helps mobile readers.

Those are good reasons, thanks.  Done Mujinga ( talk) 11:17, 21 March 2021 (UTC) reply

• In the lead, remove the comma after "until 2015".

• I've read it a few times, I prefer it with the comma. Could rephrase if it's a big issue. Might be a British English / US English thing? Mujinga ( talk) 10:02, 20 March 2021 (UTC) reply

The issue was that the sentence is kinda short, so a comma wasn't necessary.

• This section is over 400 words, so that passes WP:FILMPLOT.
• Remove the comma after "hit on the head".

• agreed on that one Mujinga ( talk) 10:08, 20 March 2021 (UTC) reply

• Add a comma after the first naming of Rodrigo Lanza.

• in the brackets? I'd rather not add one there Mujinga ( talk) 10:08, 20 March 2021 (UTC) reply

I see your point; it was an Oxford comma thing.

• Remove the comma after "Alfredo Pestana".

• that one seems good to keep since the commas are bracketing the names Mujinga ( talk) 10:08, 20 March 2021 (UTC) reply

• Add a comma after "they looked".

• i didn't add the comma but i did rephrase since the sentence was clunky Mujinga ( talk) 10:08, 20 March 2021 (UTC) reply

• "son of diplomat" → "son of a diplomat"

•  Done Mujinga ( talk) 10:08, 20 March 2021 (UTC) reply

• Add a comma after "gentrification".

• don't see the need for it, we must have different comma styles Mujinga ( talk) 10:10, 20 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Yeah, it was another Oxford comma thing.

• Other than that, this section looks good.

• "seven-storey" → "seven-story"

• "storey" is BrEng Mujinga ( talk) 10:12, 20 March 2021 (UTC) reply

• Add a comma after "Guàrdia Urbana".

• again, not seeing the need for it Mujinga ( talk) 10:12, 20 March 2021 (UTC) reply

• "decide" → "decided"

•  Done good spot! Mujinga ( talk) 10:12, 20 March 2021 (UTC) reply

• This section is extremely short, so try expanding it.

• I'll have a look to see if there are any more sources since November when I wrote it. Mujinga ( talk) 10:12, 20 March 2021 (UTC) reply

• I've added a few more lines Mujinga ( talk) 11:35, 20 March 2021 (UTC) reply
• added in the academic analysis from further reading Mujinga ( talk) 11:35, 21 March 2021 (UTC) reply

• Add a comma after "June 8, 2013".

• agreed! Mujinga ( talk) 10:17, 20 March 2021 (UTC) reply

• "action" → "act"

• yeah that makes sense Mujinga ( talk) 10:17, 20 March 2021 (UTC) reply

• "department" → "Department"

• rephrased tighter to source Mujinga ( talk) 10:17, 20 March 2021 (UTC) reply

• The word "onesidedness" doesn't sound right, so maybe reword it?

• went back to the source, rephrased Mujinga ( talk) 10:24, 20 March 2021 (UTC) reply

• Add more reviews (if possible).

• I'll have another check although this is all I could find before Mujinga ( talk) 10:24, 20 March 2021 (UTC) reply
• added two more reviews Mujinga ( talk) 11:49, 20 March 2021 (UTC) reply

• Remove the comma after "Guàrdia Urbana".

• i rather keep it, since it provides a space for breath. Mujinga ( talk) 10:27, 20 March 2021 (UTC) reply

• Add a comma after "Cs, PP".

• i rather not add one Mujinga ( talk) 10:27, 20 March 2021 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR): d ( copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·