This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Is there anybody interested in detailed research of this battle and create article? @ Utcursch: and @ Sitush:. -- Nizil ( talk) 22:12, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Sitush, I am pinging you before I revert to older version because I have found new reliable source in Gujarati regarding Chudasama dynasty. The source Gujaratno Rajkiya Ane Sanskrutik Itihas (Vol. 5) : Saltanat Kal (pp. 157-167, 516) was published in 1977 B. J. Institute; edited by R. C. Parikh and Draft:Hariprasad Shastri. Both are noted historians. It is fifth of nine volume series on history of Gujarat and considered as the most authentic and well referenced work on history of Gujarat. [1] This source covers history from Mandalika I to Mandalika III who were 14th century kings during the Gujarat Sultanate era. I will revert and go ahead following discussion with you. Regards,- Nizil ( talk) 14:00, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Nizil ( talk) 10:53, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
References
Is there any control mechanism in Wikipedia ?? people are removing my information without giving any proper reason , recently Wikipedia user @vedantisen removed my edits because my edit source was not from Harward University , Is Wikipedia only allowing only Harward University sources ?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raakuldeep ( talk • contribs) 09:06, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.61.181.211 ( talk)
@ HinduKshatrana: and @ Raakuldeep:, please stopping edit warring over reference issue. The "secondary" scholarly sources are considered most important and reliable. Any language sources are OK if they fulfill the criteria of reliable source. Rasdhar by Meghani was a "primary" source and he was not a scholar of history so his work is better not cited. Hemchandra's work Dvashraya is "primary" source but we had not cited Dvashrya directly but the commented "secondary" sources written by history scholars Shushil Kumar and Harald Tambs Lyche. Primary sources are used in very limited cases. See WP:HISTRS for more detailed info. I hope that I have accurately explained the difference. I request you two to sort out content disputes here instead on reverting again and again in the article, See WP:3RR rule.- Nizil ( talk) 13:27, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Please just add edit protection on this page. HinduKshatrana ( talk) 15:02, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Is there anybody interested in detailed research of this battle and create article? @ Utcursch: and @ Sitush:. -- Nizil ( talk) 22:12, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Sitush, I am pinging you before I revert to older version because I have found new reliable source in Gujarati regarding Chudasama dynasty. The source Gujaratno Rajkiya Ane Sanskrutik Itihas (Vol. 5) : Saltanat Kal (pp. 157-167, 516) was published in 1977 B. J. Institute; edited by R. C. Parikh and Draft:Hariprasad Shastri. Both are noted historians. It is fifth of nine volume series on history of Gujarat and considered as the most authentic and well referenced work on history of Gujarat. [1] This source covers history from Mandalika I to Mandalika III who were 14th century kings during the Gujarat Sultanate era. I will revert and go ahead following discussion with you. Regards,- Nizil ( talk) 14:00, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Nizil ( talk) 10:53, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
References
Is there any control mechanism in Wikipedia ?? people are removing my information without giving any proper reason , recently Wikipedia user @vedantisen removed my edits because my edit source was not from Harward University , Is Wikipedia only allowing only Harward University sources ?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raakuldeep ( talk • contribs) 09:06, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.61.181.211 ( talk)
@ HinduKshatrana: and @ Raakuldeep:, please stopping edit warring over reference issue. The "secondary" scholarly sources are considered most important and reliable. Any language sources are OK if they fulfill the criteria of reliable source. Rasdhar by Meghani was a "primary" source and he was not a scholar of history so his work is better not cited. Hemchandra's work Dvashraya is "primary" source but we had not cited Dvashrya directly but the commented "secondary" sources written by history scholars Shushil Kumar and Harald Tambs Lyche. Primary sources are used in very limited cases. See WP:HISTRS for more detailed info. I hope that I have accurately explained the difference. I request you two to sort out content disputes here instead on reverting again and again in the article, See WP:3RR rule.- Nizil ( talk) 13:27, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Please just add edit protection on this page. HinduKshatrana ( talk) 15:02, 14 June 2019 (UTC)