This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles LGBT studies This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles Women in Red: LGBTQ Women (2016) This article was created or improved during the LGBTQ Women edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in June 2016. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles Wiki Loves Pride This article was created or improved during Wiki Loves Pride, 2016.Wiki Loves PrideWikipedia:Wiki Loves PrideTemplate:Wiki Loves Pride talkWiki Loves Pride articles

the OreS score of article with infobox is "B": 0.04993087111771453, "C": 0.2683083239341921, "FA": 0.0024234222931705978, "GA": 0.016440740198371648, "Start": 0.6499824076109224, "Stub": 0.012914234845628854

without it is "B": 0.04316719272385977, "C": 0.200216540617623, "FA": 0.0022730024668752924, "GA": 0.011703556097281256, "Start": 0.7296803064045138, "Stub": 0.012959401689846791

therefore, the infobox is an improvement. Beatley ( talk) 19:04, 18 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Will you please stop with this stupid promotion of ORES as a way to justify infoboxes. The ORES score means only "the article will be longer if we add an infobox". It says nothing about whether the addition will actually be an improvement. See e.g. the same discussions at Talk:Lady Rachel Workman MacRobert and Talk:Marion Parris Smith for more detail about why ORES is such a bad indicator of quality for this purpose. — David Eppstein ( talk) 19:09, 18 January 2017 (UTC) reply