This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from Development of the New Testament canon was copied or moved into Christian biblical canons with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Daily page views
|
Is the Book of Mormon part of the Christian biblical canons?
For background, of previous discussion see Talk:Christianity and environmentalism and to a lesser extent Talk:Religion and environmentalism.
99.181.135.218 ( talk) 04:04, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Is the Jesus of Jerusalem in the Book of Mormon different than Jesus of Nazareth of the Bible?
99.181.159.115 ( talk) 19:17, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
It is useful to expand upon what the Protestant confessions actually say with respect to the canon. Most readers will not automatically know. That is why I strongly favour the first option over the second and would like to see further details added on the various confessions with respect to the Old Testament.
I can see no good reason why User:Editor2020 has twice reverted my edits, favouring the latter over the former. Greenshed ( talk) 23:11, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
You added the material. It was deleted by me. According to wp:brd you are now supposed to attempt to reach wp:consensus on the talk page. You have not done so, but have persisted in re-adding the material. Editor2020 ( talk) 03:19, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
References
I would think there ought to be an article titled simply "Christian Bible." There is an article titled "Bible" but it deals with Judaism and Christianity in a way that seems confusing. Someone suggested that this article is the main one representing the concept of Christian Bible. In fact, this article seems to represent the differences between all the versions. There is an article titled "Torah" and one titled "Quran."
There is obviously a Christian Bible. Why not have an article by that name? Dynasteria ( talk) 07:12, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Let me amend that: There is an article titled "Torah," one titled "Tanakh," and one titled "Hebrew Bible," and one titled "Masoretic Text." This seems to make the case for a separate article titled "Christian Bible." Dynasteria ( talk) 07:29, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
I would in any case appreciate a considered and thoughtful reply to my original query as to why there is NOT an article titled "Christian Bible." On any talk page. Thanks! Dynasteria ( talk) 01:49, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
I propose that Development of the Christian biblical canon be merged into Christian biblical canons. There is not so much content in the former that it could not be accommodated as a top-level section within the latter. Jujutsuan (Please notify with {{ re}} talk | contribs) 23:18, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from Development of the New Testament canon was copied or moved into Christian biblical canons with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Daily page views
|
Is the Book of Mormon part of the Christian biblical canons?
For background, of previous discussion see Talk:Christianity and environmentalism and to a lesser extent Talk:Religion and environmentalism.
99.181.135.218 ( talk) 04:04, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Is the Jesus of Jerusalem in the Book of Mormon different than Jesus of Nazareth of the Bible?
99.181.159.115 ( talk) 19:17, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
It is useful to expand upon what the Protestant confessions actually say with respect to the canon. Most readers will not automatically know. That is why I strongly favour the first option over the second and would like to see further details added on the various confessions with respect to the Old Testament.
I can see no good reason why User:Editor2020 has twice reverted my edits, favouring the latter over the former. Greenshed ( talk) 23:11, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
You added the material. It was deleted by me. According to wp:brd you are now supposed to attempt to reach wp:consensus on the talk page. You have not done so, but have persisted in re-adding the material. Editor2020 ( talk) 03:19, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
References
I would think there ought to be an article titled simply "Christian Bible." There is an article titled "Bible" but it deals with Judaism and Christianity in a way that seems confusing. Someone suggested that this article is the main one representing the concept of Christian Bible. In fact, this article seems to represent the differences between all the versions. There is an article titled "Torah" and one titled "Quran."
There is obviously a Christian Bible. Why not have an article by that name? Dynasteria ( talk) 07:12, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Let me amend that: There is an article titled "Torah," one titled "Tanakh," and one titled "Hebrew Bible," and one titled "Masoretic Text." This seems to make the case for a separate article titled "Christian Bible." Dynasteria ( talk) 07:29, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
I would in any case appreciate a considered and thoughtful reply to my original query as to why there is NOT an article titled "Christian Bible." On any talk page. Thanks! Dynasteria ( talk) 01:49, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
I propose that Development of the Christian biblical canon be merged into Christian biblical canons. There is not so much content in the former that it could not be accommodated as a top-level section within the latter. Jujutsuan (Please notify with {{ re}} talk | contribs) 23:18, 17 July 2016 (UTC)