This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Chitty Chitty Death Bang article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Chitty Chitty Death Bang has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
Chitty Chitty Death Bang is part of the Family Guy (season 1) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I moved the below information from the article to this talk page, because it was unsourced. Cirt ( talk) 19:58, 18 December 2007 (UTC).
Of course, if and when sources are provided this can be moved back into the article. I will try to find sources for some of this, and note it here. Cirt ( talk) 19:58, 18 December 2007 (UTC).
I cant believe its been nearly 10 years and we STILL CAN'T find a souce for theses edits!! Its joke. -- Crazyseiko ( talk) 22:57, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: 97198 ( talk) 02:21, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Without looking at the rest of the article at more than a glance, my biggest issue with this is the Reception section. At present it only has two reviews - one of which isn't even by a professional critic, so I'd get rid of that per MOS:TV#Reception - and that really isn't enough. The purpose of a Reception section is to summarise the wide critical response to an episode, and one opinion (I'm discounting "the TV Critic") is in no way representative of the broader critical reception of the episode. Obviously, the more reviews the better, but I personally would say a bare minimum of three professional reviews are needed to give an overview of an episode's reception.
I'll put the GAN on hold rather than fail straight away, to give you a chance to look for more reviews (if possible). If you can flesh out the Reception section, I'll have a look at the rest of the article. 97198 ( talk) 02:21, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: That Ole Cheesy Dude ( Talk to the hand!) 00:08, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Looks good, a few changes and it's ready to go.
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Chitty Chitty Death Bang article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Chitty Chitty Death Bang has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
Chitty Chitty Death Bang is part of the Family Guy (season 1) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I moved the below information from the article to this talk page, because it was unsourced. Cirt ( talk) 19:58, 18 December 2007 (UTC).
Of course, if and when sources are provided this can be moved back into the article. I will try to find sources for some of this, and note it here. Cirt ( talk) 19:58, 18 December 2007 (UTC).
I cant believe its been nearly 10 years and we STILL CAN'T find a souce for theses edits!! Its joke. -- Crazyseiko ( talk) 22:57, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: 97198 ( talk) 02:21, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Without looking at the rest of the article at more than a glance, my biggest issue with this is the Reception section. At present it only has two reviews - one of which isn't even by a professional critic, so I'd get rid of that per MOS:TV#Reception - and that really isn't enough. The purpose of a Reception section is to summarise the wide critical response to an episode, and one opinion (I'm discounting "the TV Critic") is in no way representative of the broader critical reception of the episode. Obviously, the more reviews the better, but I personally would say a bare minimum of three professional reviews are needed to give an overview of an episode's reception.
I'll put the GAN on hold rather than fail straight away, to give you a chance to look for more reviews (if possible). If you can flesh out the Reception section, I'll have a look at the rest of the article. 97198 ( talk) 02:21, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: That Ole Cheesy Dude ( Talk to the hand!) 00:08, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Looks good, a few changes and it's ready to go.