This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 March 2021. The result of the discussion was keep.

This page was proposed for deletion by MilborneOne ( talk · contribs) on 20 March 2021 with the comment: Not really particularly noteworthy, the RAF is not alone in having many of these single aircraft "display teams" over the years (four or five every year) and none pass the threshold of a stand-alone article It was contested by Andrew Davidson ( talk · contribs) on 2021-03-23

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Aircraft This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met This article is supported by the aircraft project. United Kingdom Start‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Text and references copied from RAF Odiham to Chinook Display Team, See former article's history for a list of contributors. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 13:47, 31 March 2021 (UTC) reply

There are many evolving iterations. Is this copyrighted, or in the public domain because it was created by public workers? Would be a great addition to the article 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 14:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC) reply

As a recent design I would imagine it would be Crown copyright. The UK is not like the US where any work of a government employee is automatically public domain. Details at Crown_copyright#United_Kingdom. - Ahunt ( talk) 14:39, 31 March 2021 (UTC) reply