![]() | Hakka Wikipedia was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 7 December 2023 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Chinese Wikipedia. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
![]() | The article
Eastern Min Wikipedia was
nominated for
deletion.
The discussion was closed on 7 December 2023 with a consensus to
merge the content into
Chinese Wikipedia. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the article for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use this talk page. Do not remove this template after completing the merger. A bot will replace it with {{
afd-merged-from}}. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Chinese Wikipedia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Chinese Wikipedia. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Chinese Wikipedia at the Reference desk. |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on February 18, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article should probably mention the existence of separate Wikipedias for other Chinese dialects, which are also written in Chinese characters, ex. Cantonese. [1] How large are the written differences? AlexLibman 18:34, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Can someone add some information to this article about how the Chinese Wikipedia handles Simplified/Traditional characters? — Lowellian ( talk)[[]] 02:25, Nov 24, 2004 (UTC)
I read recently on the mailing list about an impersonating site wikicn.com. Relevant? -- user:zanimum
How come the Norwegian Wikipedias can't do what the Chinese Wikipedia does with its different characters. Would it be too hard to convert the two spellings? BirdValiant 20:40, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
more at: Wikipedia:Village pump
Chinese-language Wikipedia presents different view of history "But on sensitive questions of China's modern history or on hot-button issues, the Chinese version diverges so dramatically from its English counterpart that it sometimes reads as if it were approved by the censors themselves."
There are many users who felt exactly the same way. And most of the time, their comments, votes got deleted. For example, I wrote some comments, the moderators not only deleted them, they also made them disappeared as if nothing was ever deleted!
1. I wrote a subtitle "house arrest until death" for Zhao ziyang in the chinese version, it was immediately deleted. however, the same thing that I wrote in the English page is still kept even today.
2. I added the Chinese Tibetan history after 1949. It was also immediatly deleted, and I was banned. And the links that I added which are from the current exile dalai lama, those links were also deleted. Isn't that ridiculous, how can they add my contribution without listing the references?! And strangely enough, somehow what I wrote now appeared all those Tibetan articles on the Chinese page so the moderators can say that they are not pro communists, even though the author - me is still banned because of what i wrote!
3. I added human rights and falun gong in the "people's republic of china" article, it was also immediately deleted, then it was put under protection. it has been over a month now. Even today, there is not single word about human rights or falun gong in that article.
4. the article about "two Chinas" which has been deleted twice in the month of November. Then one of the moderator claimed that it has never been deleted.
5. The chinese-russian border treaty, the entire article was also deleted not so long ago. now one of the moderator "ran" claimed that it was deleted due to "copyright" violation which is a total lie. it has several early versions, which has nothing to do with any sort of copyright violation at all. After my complain which was deleted, somehow now the same article reappeared with the same content.
6. the tiananmen square protest article, I added similar contents in both the Chinese and English version. The chinese moderator Louer immediatly deleted my contribution, and put that article under protection. AT the same time, whatever I wrote on the same subject in the English article did not got deleted at all.
I have tried to added my comments about those things on the Chiense version of village pump, however, they deleted everything that I wrote, and called those as "vandalism." One time, another user who wrote a comment supporting me, it was also immediately deleted by those moderators. So clearly, people can not openly, freely discuss topics they want to. Another user reverted those comments that I wrote, it was also changed back instantly by one of the moderators.
There are 30 moderators from mainland China, 6 of them are from the capital city - beijing. At the same time, the government is still blocking the entire 13 billion Chinese' asscess to this web site. taiwan and hongkong should have more users than the users from mainland China, however, they only have 17 and 13 moderators. It is a well known fact that there are plenty Chinese spies who are living in taiwan right now. I am writing this, so hopefully the wikipedia people can look into this matter seriously. SummerThunder 01:50, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
He wrote his personal comment as :"2) There is no such thing called "self-censorship" at Chinese Wikipedia; indeed any intention for such practice at Chinese Wikipedia will be denounced by most Chinese Wikipedians."
Therefore, it is deleted swiftly. -- SummerThunder 05:26, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
why don't you just say that i am "leaking state secret"? i am listing facts based on truth. -- SummerThunder 08:11, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
exactly, I'm asking you why you deleted all the parts I added on the Chinese site? and how come I am able to add those exact things freely on here, when you and the rest of the Chinese moderators deleted all on the Chinese site?-- SummerThunder 19:39, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
It would be interesting for the article to list the server locations. It mentions they're outside of the PRC but that's about all I see. — coelacan talk — 20:49, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Someone needs to verify and improve the 10 year olds grammar (not meant to be offensive there, 10 year old Chinese kid, I'm over 20 and I still can't speak french and my english is rough at best). That would be someone with enough optimism to maintain an account obviously because of the protection. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 ( talk) 03:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure how the internet ban is monitored by Wikipedia, but I am currently residing in China and I have access to this site, so doesn't that mean that at least part of the ban has rescinded? I don't know when the change occurred, but all through Spring of this year I haven't been able to get access to even the English site. Now I have complete access. Anyone else have a similar experience?
I just had another thought that might contribute to this. I have also recently installed a program on my computer called Peer Guardian 2, which will block access from different IP sources, including government censors. Regardless, I still think I've accessed Wikipedia recently on other computers as well. More on this when I look into it. Tweil ( talk) 15:20, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
zh.wikipedia is only availible in Mandarin chinese, someone pleaes correct the template, Chinese languages is about the language family, not mandarin. Forkuna Bibhead ( talk) 03:21, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
I was just wondering,which system is better to be used-simplified or traditional? Traditional is able to 'represent' the Chinese culture better,but as the PRC is growing and the simplified system is used there,the simplified would be better to used.But I am not sure which system is better to be used for representing wikipedia. LeUrsidae96 ( talk) 13:46, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
It says that terms such as Anglo-American bias, which is generally accepted. Why it's never mentioned in the article English Wikipedia? –– 虞海 (Yú Hǎi) ✍ 07:09, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
我 国 / 我 國 ("our co un t ry"; referring to the Pe ople's Repu blic of Ch ina or the Re pub lic of Ch ina , depending on viewpoint) are considered " sinoc entrism ", but in English Wikipedia there'sTrener drugiej klasy tenisa stołowego, charakteryzuje go perfekcjonizm i zamiłowanie do tego sportu. Struga deski z szafy. Nienawidzi sęków! Jest siwy i wszyscy się z niego śmieją. Ma 52 lat i nic jeszcze nie zaruchał, posiada natomiast za to 28 desek, które trzyma w gablocie. Na równi z sękami i żywicą nie cierpi M.W ,który mu ubliża. Mama robi mu kanapki do pracy. Pije picie z butelki po płynie do mycia szyb. Nosi mokasyny, dres i muchy. Mieszka z rodzicami, którzy przyjeżdzają po niego z pracy. Zna wszystkie informacje na temat sprzętu do tenisa stołowego(przy grubościach blatu myli się jeszcze niekiedy o 0,001mm), no ale cóż jest jeszcze juniorem. Trzyma sztamę z trenerem sekcji brydża "Ambrożym Kleksem Aka Jordan". Nosi przy sobie zestaw do mini golfa i mate "master pong". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.76.118.83 ( talk) 21:25, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Which Chinese language is the Chinese Wikipedia actually written in? I assume Standard Mandarin, but the article doesn't actually say that, it just says "Chinese" which is ambiguous. Should this be fixed? CodeCat ( talk) 19:44, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Dear all citizens from the world of freedom,
I am here to told you a horrible story about Chinese wikipedia registered users removing "unwanted" contents systematically such as "the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989" and " Tank Man" from the related articles, for example " Type 59 tank". In these articles they remove everything about Tiananmen or tank man, including links, pictures, or even just text, they won't let any wordings (such as "1989" or 64 which represnts "June 4") survive in these articles. Any content about June 4 had been removed recent years, and it seems no one would dare to change the condition.
In some cases, they even request for deleting the whole articles. For example, in the talk page of "Tank man" Chinese version, you can even see how they attempted to delete the whole article.
Here are just some of the notable examples. Recently they even tried to remove an article about Masanjia Labor Camp by laying "there is no report by western media." Then a guy added some links such as Huffington Post, Daily Mail and CNN. A user from China then questioned if The Huffington Post and Daily Mail of British "reliable sources of news". That Chinese user kept on saying "you should not write such article just after reading those bias reports" and "those are not reliable sources of News". That guy keep on blaming and another user from China also joined.
They also talk of removing wiki links about june four protest. They consider those adding or talking about june 4 as bad guys "damaging" the Chinese wikipedia.
Sorry for the inconvenient I caused, as all links I post are all Chinese only. I just hope to raised the attentions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.118.51.245 ( talk) 10:20, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
For example, "Type 59 tank @ Chinese wiki".
Since 2007, they started by removing the iconic tank man picture, not just once, but again and again and again. They then removed descriptions about Tiananmen and the protest students, also again and again, repeated several times. At 2011, they finally made others giving up to edit, since then no more Tiananmen wordings can be found in the article.
Shame on some Chinese wiki users from China, their behaviour is totally unacceptable, and shame to those who turned a blind eye. I also shocked by the fact that there are some users, either from Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and very few living in USA, they get involved too.
Shame to them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.49.202.157 ( talk) 02:48, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
有的人啊,就是想弄个大新闻,把我们中文维基批判一番,毕竟还是too young too simple。但是呢,你问我们资瓷不资瓷黑雪姬,这个也不好讲。闷声发大财才是坠好的。 SzMithrandir ( talk) 06:07, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Today, Taipei Times released this editorial:
It discusses a few recent issues regarding the Chinese Wikipedia. -- benlisquare T• C• E 03:39, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
There are problems with this method. Some simplified characters equals different traditional characters and vice versa because characters (de)merged. And some new characters like the ones for chemical elements stay unconverted since either the traditional or the simplified one isn't supported yet. -- 2.245.175.139 ( talk) 00:52, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
en:Chinese_Wikipedia#Origin_of_edits Ceased to block the Chinese wikipedia mean? What about copy articles from en:Baidu Baike and en:Baike.com?-- Kaiyr ( talk) 19:11, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
China is making a knock-off of Wikipedia!It is going to take away certain thing that may hurt the communist government. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/05/20000-chinese-writers-will-create-their-own-wikipedia-competitor/ https://www.engadget.com/2017/05/02/china-makes-its-own-wikipedia/ 65.255.88.233 ( talk) 23:14, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Can anybody perhaps add some more info about the slogan - 海納百川,有容乃大?
If I try to translate it in Google Translate, a very different translation comes up: "Be tolerant to diversity, tolerance is a virtue". I guess that Google Translate somehow stores a very idiomatic interpretation of this couplet. It would be great to know more about this:
If anybody thinks that it's hard to answer the above questions in a referenced, verifiable encyclopedic manner in the article, I'd at least like an unofficial answer on the talk page :)
Also, it would be nice to have consistency in terminology. The infobox calls it a "slogan", and the article text calls it a "subtitle". I'd use identical terms, to make it easier to find and to interpret.
Thanks! -- Amir E. Aharoni ( talk) 09:13, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
I have a question, "Why does Wikipedia use traditional Chinese as the default Chinese language?" Traditional Chinese is mainly used only by Hongkongese and Taiwanese, while over 1.6 billion people in the world are using simple Chinese. Who made the policy decision to use traditional Chinese as the default choice? Why don't you use Shakespeare's English instead of standard modern English? 10-21-2017 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fiona Fan Wang ( talk • contribs) 04:57, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
There used to be a traditional Chinese version of wiki. Where is it now? I can't stand simplified Chinese, but worse is Cantonese with traditional characters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.165.218.240 ( talk) 10:25, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
The self-censorship section etc. quotes non-RS and very outdated sources, e.g.
On December 1, 2006, ...
-> Let us delete them. Comments? Zezen ( talk) 19:48, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
The use of interwiki links on this article is problematic, as the links are still shown in print versions, but cannot be followed. I would like to replace them, but I don't know how it should be done. Is there any template for this? Geolodus ( talk) 13:07, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 維基大典. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 12:09, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Wikipedia in PRC. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 11#Wikipedia in PRC until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (
𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠)
09:11, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
This topic meets GNG because it was a news event, but a few months out, I'm not seeing the kind of enduring significance that would justify a separate article per WP:PAGEDECIDE. We can cover the 2021 actions at a reasonable level of summary style detail at the article on Chinese Wikipedia. {{u| Sdkb}} talk 18:50, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
The article notes:
According to a September statement by Maggie Dennis, the Foundation’s VP of trust and safety, Techyan and six other high-level users were in fact involved in “an infiltration” of the Chinese Wikipedia. In an interview, Dennis said a monthslong investigation found that the veteran editors were “coordinating to bias the encyclopedia and bias positions of authority” around a pro-Beijing viewpoint, in part by meddling in administrator elections and threatening, doxxing, and even physically assaulting, other volunteers. In all, the Foundation banned seven editors and temporarily demoted a dozen others over the abuses, which Dennis called “unprecedented in scope and nature.”
...
In some cases, the Foundation found, the fights had spread beyond online abuse and harassment into real-life threats, and worse. But because it released few details about the editors’ abuses, citing privacy concerns, the Foundation left many editors to speculate. On talk pages, in community chat rooms, and in media coverage, “pro-China infiltration” suggested an organized propaganda campaign, part of Beijing’s ongoing efforts to shape its image online. But such attributions are notoriously hard to make, and despite widespread evidence of China’s efforts to burnish its image online, Dennis says there is no evidence the banned editors were backed by the government.
The Chinese Wikipedia version of the article at zh:2021年維基媒體基金會針對中文維基百科的行動 has more sources and content that can be used to expand 2021 Wikimedia Foundation actions on the Chinese Wikipedia.
Seem like User Amigao have a problem with things that is from chinese arent you? You know, it's kind of suspicious when you basically use the excuse of "non-WP:RS" to eliminate the opinions from different sides. And seeing your talk page, I guess this is also not your first time -- Someone97816 ( talk) 04:50, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() | Hakka Wikipedia was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 7 December 2023 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Chinese Wikipedia. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
![]() | The article
Eastern Min Wikipedia was
nominated for
deletion.
The discussion was closed on 7 December 2023 with a consensus to
merge the content into
Chinese Wikipedia. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the article for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use this talk page. Do not remove this template after completing the merger. A bot will replace it with {{
afd-merged-from}}. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Chinese Wikipedia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Chinese Wikipedia. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Chinese Wikipedia at the Reference desk. |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on February 18, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article should probably mention the existence of separate Wikipedias for other Chinese dialects, which are also written in Chinese characters, ex. Cantonese. [1] How large are the written differences? AlexLibman 18:34, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Can someone add some information to this article about how the Chinese Wikipedia handles Simplified/Traditional characters? — Lowellian ( talk)[[]] 02:25, Nov 24, 2004 (UTC)
I read recently on the mailing list about an impersonating site wikicn.com. Relevant? -- user:zanimum
How come the Norwegian Wikipedias can't do what the Chinese Wikipedia does with its different characters. Would it be too hard to convert the two spellings? BirdValiant 20:40, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
more at: Wikipedia:Village pump
Chinese-language Wikipedia presents different view of history "But on sensitive questions of China's modern history or on hot-button issues, the Chinese version diverges so dramatically from its English counterpart that it sometimes reads as if it were approved by the censors themselves."
There are many users who felt exactly the same way. And most of the time, their comments, votes got deleted. For example, I wrote some comments, the moderators not only deleted them, they also made them disappeared as if nothing was ever deleted!
1. I wrote a subtitle "house arrest until death" for Zhao ziyang in the chinese version, it was immediately deleted. however, the same thing that I wrote in the English page is still kept even today.
2. I added the Chinese Tibetan history after 1949. It was also immediatly deleted, and I was banned. And the links that I added which are from the current exile dalai lama, those links were also deleted. Isn't that ridiculous, how can they add my contribution without listing the references?! And strangely enough, somehow what I wrote now appeared all those Tibetan articles on the Chinese page so the moderators can say that they are not pro communists, even though the author - me is still banned because of what i wrote!
3. I added human rights and falun gong in the "people's republic of china" article, it was also immediately deleted, then it was put under protection. it has been over a month now. Even today, there is not single word about human rights or falun gong in that article.
4. the article about "two Chinas" which has been deleted twice in the month of November. Then one of the moderator claimed that it has never been deleted.
5. The chinese-russian border treaty, the entire article was also deleted not so long ago. now one of the moderator "ran" claimed that it was deleted due to "copyright" violation which is a total lie. it has several early versions, which has nothing to do with any sort of copyright violation at all. After my complain which was deleted, somehow now the same article reappeared with the same content.
6. the tiananmen square protest article, I added similar contents in both the Chinese and English version. The chinese moderator Louer immediatly deleted my contribution, and put that article under protection. AT the same time, whatever I wrote on the same subject in the English article did not got deleted at all.
I have tried to added my comments about those things on the Chiense version of village pump, however, they deleted everything that I wrote, and called those as "vandalism." One time, another user who wrote a comment supporting me, it was also immediately deleted by those moderators. So clearly, people can not openly, freely discuss topics they want to. Another user reverted those comments that I wrote, it was also changed back instantly by one of the moderators.
There are 30 moderators from mainland China, 6 of them are from the capital city - beijing. At the same time, the government is still blocking the entire 13 billion Chinese' asscess to this web site. taiwan and hongkong should have more users than the users from mainland China, however, they only have 17 and 13 moderators. It is a well known fact that there are plenty Chinese spies who are living in taiwan right now. I am writing this, so hopefully the wikipedia people can look into this matter seriously. SummerThunder 01:50, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
He wrote his personal comment as :"2) There is no such thing called "self-censorship" at Chinese Wikipedia; indeed any intention for such practice at Chinese Wikipedia will be denounced by most Chinese Wikipedians."
Therefore, it is deleted swiftly. -- SummerThunder 05:26, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
why don't you just say that i am "leaking state secret"? i am listing facts based on truth. -- SummerThunder 08:11, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
exactly, I'm asking you why you deleted all the parts I added on the Chinese site? and how come I am able to add those exact things freely on here, when you and the rest of the Chinese moderators deleted all on the Chinese site?-- SummerThunder 19:39, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
It would be interesting for the article to list the server locations. It mentions they're outside of the PRC but that's about all I see. — coelacan talk — 20:49, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Someone needs to verify and improve the 10 year olds grammar (not meant to be offensive there, 10 year old Chinese kid, I'm over 20 and I still can't speak french and my english is rough at best). That would be someone with enough optimism to maintain an account obviously because of the protection. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 ( talk) 03:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure how the internet ban is monitored by Wikipedia, but I am currently residing in China and I have access to this site, so doesn't that mean that at least part of the ban has rescinded? I don't know when the change occurred, but all through Spring of this year I haven't been able to get access to even the English site. Now I have complete access. Anyone else have a similar experience?
I just had another thought that might contribute to this. I have also recently installed a program on my computer called Peer Guardian 2, which will block access from different IP sources, including government censors. Regardless, I still think I've accessed Wikipedia recently on other computers as well. More on this when I look into it. Tweil ( talk) 15:20, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
zh.wikipedia is only availible in Mandarin chinese, someone pleaes correct the template, Chinese languages is about the language family, not mandarin. Forkuna Bibhead ( talk) 03:21, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
I was just wondering,which system is better to be used-simplified or traditional? Traditional is able to 'represent' the Chinese culture better,but as the PRC is growing and the simplified system is used there,the simplified would be better to used.But I am not sure which system is better to be used for representing wikipedia. LeUrsidae96 ( talk) 13:46, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
It says that terms such as Anglo-American bias, which is generally accepted. Why it's never mentioned in the article English Wikipedia? –– 虞海 (Yú Hǎi) ✍ 07:09, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
我 国 / 我 國 ("our co un t ry"; referring to the Pe ople's Repu blic of Ch ina or the Re pub lic of Ch ina , depending on viewpoint) are considered " sinoc entrism ", but in English Wikipedia there'sTrener drugiej klasy tenisa stołowego, charakteryzuje go perfekcjonizm i zamiłowanie do tego sportu. Struga deski z szafy. Nienawidzi sęków! Jest siwy i wszyscy się z niego śmieją. Ma 52 lat i nic jeszcze nie zaruchał, posiada natomiast za to 28 desek, które trzyma w gablocie. Na równi z sękami i żywicą nie cierpi M.W ,który mu ubliża. Mama robi mu kanapki do pracy. Pije picie z butelki po płynie do mycia szyb. Nosi mokasyny, dres i muchy. Mieszka z rodzicami, którzy przyjeżdzają po niego z pracy. Zna wszystkie informacje na temat sprzętu do tenisa stołowego(przy grubościach blatu myli się jeszcze niekiedy o 0,001mm), no ale cóż jest jeszcze juniorem. Trzyma sztamę z trenerem sekcji brydża "Ambrożym Kleksem Aka Jordan". Nosi przy sobie zestaw do mini golfa i mate "master pong". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.76.118.83 ( talk) 21:25, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Which Chinese language is the Chinese Wikipedia actually written in? I assume Standard Mandarin, but the article doesn't actually say that, it just says "Chinese" which is ambiguous. Should this be fixed? CodeCat ( talk) 19:44, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Dear all citizens from the world of freedom,
I am here to told you a horrible story about Chinese wikipedia registered users removing "unwanted" contents systematically such as "the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989" and " Tank Man" from the related articles, for example " Type 59 tank". In these articles they remove everything about Tiananmen or tank man, including links, pictures, or even just text, they won't let any wordings (such as "1989" or 64 which represnts "June 4") survive in these articles. Any content about June 4 had been removed recent years, and it seems no one would dare to change the condition.
In some cases, they even request for deleting the whole articles. For example, in the talk page of "Tank man" Chinese version, you can even see how they attempted to delete the whole article.
Here are just some of the notable examples. Recently they even tried to remove an article about Masanjia Labor Camp by laying "there is no report by western media." Then a guy added some links such as Huffington Post, Daily Mail and CNN. A user from China then questioned if The Huffington Post and Daily Mail of British "reliable sources of news". That Chinese user kept on saying "you should not write such article just after reading those bias reports" and "those are not reliable sources of News". That guy keep on blaming and another user from China also joined.
They also talk of removing wiki links about june four protest. They consider those adding or talking about june 4 as bad guys "damaging" the Chinese wikipedia.
Sorry for the inconvenient I caused, as all links I post are all Chinese only. I just hope to raised the attentions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.118.51.245 ( talk) 10:20, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
For example, "Type 59 tank @ Chinese wiki".
Since 2007, they started by removing the iconic tank man picture, not just once, but again and again and again. They then removed descriptions about Tiananmen and the protest students, also again and again, repeated several times. At 2011, they finally made others giving up to edit, since then no more Tiananmen wordings can be found in the article.
Shame on some Chinese wiki users from China, their behaviour is totally unacceptable, and shame to those who turned a blind eye. I also shocked by the fact that there are some users, either from Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and very few living in USA, they get involved too.
Shame to them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.49.202.157 ( talk) 02:48, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
有的人啊,就是想弄个大新闻,把我们中文维基批判一番,毕竟还是too young too simple。但是呢,你问我们资瓷不资瓷黑雪姬,这个也不好讲。闷声发大财才是坠好的。 SzMithrandir ( talk) 06:07, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Today, Taipei Times released this editorial:
It discusses a few recent issues regarding the Chinese Wikipedia. -- benlisquare T• C• E 03:39, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
There are problems with this method. Some simplified characters equals different traditional characters and vice versa because characters (de)merged. And some new characters like the ones for chemical elements stay unconverted since either the traditional or the simplified one isn't supported yet. -- 2.245.175.139 ( talk) 00:52, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
en:Chinese_Wikipedia#Origin_of_edits Ceased to block the Chinese wikipedia mean? What about copy articles from en:Baidu Baike and en:Baike.com?-- Kaiyr ( talk) 19:11, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
China is making a knock-off of Wikipedia!It is going to take away certain thing that may hurt the communist government. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/05/20000-chinese-writers-will-create-their-own-wikipedia-competitor/ https://www.engadget.com/2017/05/02/china-makes-its-own-wikipedia/ 65.255.88.233 ( talk) 23:14, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Can anybody perhaps add some more info about the slogan - 海納百川,有容乃大?
If I try to translate it in Google Translate, a very different translation comes up: "Be tolerant to diversity, tolerance is a virtue". I guess that Google Translate somehow stores a very idiomatic interpretation of this couplet. It would be great to know more about this:
If anybody thinks that it's hard to answer the above questions in a referenced, verifiable encyclopedic manner in the article, I'd at least like an unofficial answer on the talk page :)
Also, it would be nice to have consistency in terminology. The infobox calls it a "slogan", and the article text calls it a "subtitle". I'd use identical terms, to make it easier to find and to interpret.
Thanks! -- Amir E. Aharoni ( talk) 09:13, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
I have a question, "Why does Wikipedia use traditional Chinese as the default Chinese language?" Traditional Chinese is mainly used only by Hongkongese and Taiwanese, while over 1.6 billion people in the world are using simple Chinese. Who made the policy decision to use traditional Chinese as the default choice? Why don't you use Shakespeare's English instead of standard modern English? 10-21-2017 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fiona Fan Wang ( talk • contribs) 04:57, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
There used to be a traditional Chinese version of wiki. Where is it now? I can't stand simplified Chinese, but worse is Cantonese with traditional characters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.165.218.240 ( talk) 10:25, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
The self-censorship section etc. quotes non-RS and very outdated sources, e.g.
On December 1, 2006, ...
-> Let us delete them. Comments? Zezen ( talk) 19:48, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
The use of interwiki links on this article is problematic, as the links are still shown in print versions, but cannot be followed. I would like to replace them, but I don't know how it should be done. Is there any template for this? Geolodus ( talk) 13:07, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 維基大典. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 12:09, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Wikipedia in PRC. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 11#Wikipedia in PRC until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (
𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠)
09:11, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
This topic meets GNG because it was a news event, but a few months out, I'm not seeing the kind of enduring significance that would justify a separate article per WP:PAGEDECIDE. We can cover the 2021 actions at a reasonable level of summary style detail at the article on Chinese Wikipedia. {{u| Sdkb}} talk 18:50, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
The article notes:
According to a September statement by Maggie Dennis, the Foundation’s VP of trust and safety, Techyan and six other high-level users were in fact involved in “an infiltration” of the Chinese Wikipedia. In an interview, Dennis said a monthslong investigation found that the veteran editors were “coordinating to bias the encyclopedia and bias positions of authority” around a pro-Beijing viewpoint, in part by meddling in administrator elections and threatening, doxxing, and even physically assaulting, other volunteers. In all, the Foundation banned seven editors and temporarily demoted a dozen others over the abuses, which Dennis called “unprecedented in scope and nature.”
...
In some cases, the Foundation found, the fights had spread beyond online abuse and harassment into real-life threats, and worse. But because it released few details about the editors’ abuses, citing privacy concerns, the Foundation left many editors to speculate. On talk pages, in community chat rooms, and in media coverage, “pro-China infiltration” suggested an organized propaganda campaign, part of Beijing’s ongoing efforts to shape its image online. But such attributions are notoriously hard to make, and despite widespread evidence of China’s efforts to burnish its image online, Dennis says there is no evidence the banned editors were backed by the government.
The Chinese Wikipedia version of the article at zh:2021年維基媒體基金會針對中文維基百科的行動 has more sources and content that can be used to expand 2021 Wikimedia Foundation actions on the Chinese Wikipedia.
Seem like User Amigao have a problem with things that is from chinese arent you? You know, it's kind of suspicious when you basically use the excuse of "non-WP:RS" to eliminate the opinions from different sides. And seeing your talk page, I guess this is also not your first time -- Someone97816 ( talk) 04:50, 14 May 2022 (UTC)