This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
China Eastern Airlines Flight 5735 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about China Eastern Airlines Flight 5735. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about China Eastern Airlines Flight 5735 at the Reference desk. |
A news item involving China Eastern Airlines Flight 5735 was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 21 March 2022. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
I think the recent reports that have surfaced from ABC News correlating with the Wall Street Journal's report that the U.S. officials investigating the crash believe that the aircraft was intentionally crashed should be also mentioned in this article in some form. They give details that the U.S. investigators did research into the personal life of one of the pilots and noted he may have been dealing with issues. ₛₒₘₑBₒdyₐₙyBₒdy₀₅ ( talk) 16:26, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Reuters is also reporting this and not just reporting the WSJ report. The Chinese government denies this. So hiding these findings is taking sides with the People's Republic of China. That is wrong. Just be neutral. Charliestalnaker ( talk) 16:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
On the Chinese version of this article, there is a section discussing some minor incidents, including "misreporting that MU5735 is arrived the airport", "some wrongly reported that the black box is found", "impersonating passengers not boarded MU5735", "Marketing in advantage of the MU5735 incident" (Benefit from others' misfortune), "Bullying on victim's parents" and "Internet rumors". But there is no such discussion on the English counterpart and I want to translate this to there. After a brief discussion on the Discord, I decided to discuss this on the talk page. It is better to putting them on the primary incident sections as well as the " Reactions" section instead of opening a new section. HaydenWong ( talk) 11:15, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Why the whitewash of the crash? We know it was not mechanical. We know there was evidence found at the crew hotel the day of the crash. We know a Chinese military YouTube channel (Chinese Forces) reported that this crash was caused by the pilot. Wikipedia does not need to cover for Boeing. That is the job of Boeing’s Senators and lobbyists. But Wikipedia should not whitewash mass murder such as this crash to spare the feelings of the Chinese Wikipedia whitewashers 2600:6C4E:B7F:F850:A4A6:16EF:18F8:8A17 ( talk) 14:01, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
The lead states that this event is an accident. This is still under investigation, and it has not been determined whether or not this was accidental or deliberate (with deliberate intent seeming likely). One distinction between accident and incident is intent:
"Accidents, by definition, are unexpected and unintended events that lead to harm, damage, injury, or loss." [1] (emphasis added} 136.54.106.120 ( talk) 14:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
China Eastern Airlines Flight 5735 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about China Eastern Airlines Flight 5735. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about China Eastern Airlines Flight 5735 at the Reference desk. |
A news item involving China Eastern Airlines Flight 5735 was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 21 March 2022. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
I think the recent reports that have surfaced from ABC News correlating with the Wall Street Journal's report that the U.S. officials investigating the crash believe that the aircraft was intentionally crashed should be also mentioned in this article in some form. They give details that the U.S. investigators did research into the personal life of one of the pilots and noted he may have been dealing with issues. ₛₒₘₑBₒdyₐₙyBₒdy₀₅ ( talk) 16:26, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Reuters is also reporting this and not just reporting the WSJ report. The Chinese government denies this. So hiding these findings is taking sides with the People's Republic of China. That is wrong. Just be neutral. Charliestalnaker ( talk) 16:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
On the Chinese version of this article, there is a section discussing some minor incidents, including "misreporting that MU5735 is arrived the airport", "some wrongly reported that the black box is found", "impersonating passengers not boarded MU5735", "Marketing in advantage of the MU5735 incident" (Benefit from others' misfortune), "Bullying on victim's parents" and "Internet rumors". But there is no such discussion on the English counterpart and I want to translate this to there. After a brief discussion on the Discord, I decided to discuss this on the talk page. It is better to putting them on the primary incident sections as well as the " Reactions" section instead of opening a new section. HaydenWong ( talk) 11:15, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Why the whitewash of the crash? We know it was not mechanical. We know there was evidence found at the crew hotel the day of the crash. We know a Chinese military YouTube channel (Chinese Forces) reported that this crash was caused by the pilot. Wikipedia does not need to cover for Boeing. That is the job of Boeing’s Senators and lobbyists. But Wikipedia should not whitewash mass murder such as this crash to spare the feelings of the Chinese Wikipedia whitewashers 2600:6C4E:B7F:F850:A4A6:16EF:18F8:8A17 ( talk) 14:01, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
The lead states that this event is an accident. This is still under investigation, and it has not been determined whether or not this was accidental or deliberate (with deliberate intent seeming likely). One distinction between accident and incident is intent:
"Accidents, by definition, are unexpected and unintended events that lead to harm, damage, injury, or loss." [1] (emphasis added} 136.54.106.120 ( talk) 14:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC)