![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Chee kufta appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 11 January 2009, and was viewed approximately 1,253 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
"Chee kufta" and "çiğ köfte" appear to be the same name with different spellings for essentially the same dish of eastern Anatolia as found in Armenia and Turkey. I realize that Armenia and Turkey are very distinct in many ways, and that there are cultural and political disputes between them, but in this case this appears to be a dish common across ethnic groups in eastern Anatolia. -- macrakis ( talk) 17:06, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
-- Emir Ali Enç ( talk) 03:44, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
I'm thinking we'll have to make this List of raw meat dishes, the way things are going. There is no definitive one name for this.-- King Bedford I Seek his grace 11:13, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
I will say this over and over for you Turkophiles: a dish having a Turkish name does not give you the right to present it in such a way as to make it seem "Turkish". Starting in the 15th century, Armenians who got "Turkified" spoke in Turkish and eventually the average Ottoman Armenian knew Turkish only. This is the strongest indicator why much of Western Armenian cuisine have Turkish names. If you want to "prove" a dish is "Turkish", then show me the Central Asian variant. If you cannot, then it is Armenian. I know, some of you realize this, and therefore attempt to connect everything to Central Asia, to spread Turkish cultural propaganda, like how everything came out of Cetral Asia. The nomad Turks who migrated to on their mules to Armenia packed their animals 100 meters in the air with enlightened Turkish cultural goodness to teach those backwards, uncivilized cave-dwelling Armenians how to have a culture, right? Anyway I am making changes to the way this article is presented, Chee Kufta, like many other "Turkish" dishes is not connected to Turkish anything. Thinkfood ( talk) 04:02, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
This article isn't about the history of the food and what it should be. The food in the article had a Turkish name and have been being made in Turkey for long enough time to consider it Turkish. If you would like to add anything to the history of the subject from credible sources feel free. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.197.159.86 ( talk) 00:53, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
There is no need to be xenophobic in an article about food, take it easy. Anyway, your way of proving a cultural object is childish. Please be more constructive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.41.74.111 ( talk) 17:27, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
The name "Çiğ Köfte" is unacceptable. English isn't the same as Turkish, not to mention that kufta/koefte is neither Turkish in name nor origin. Stop this Turkish propaganda BS. 99.7.123.116 ( talk) 22:29, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Chee kufta appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 11 January 2009, and was viewed approximately 1,253 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
"Chee kufta" and "çiğ köfte" appear to be the same name with different spellings for essentially the same dish of eastern Anatolia as found in Armenia and Turkey. I realize that Armenia and Turkey are very distinct in many ways, and that there are cultural and political disputes between them, but in this case this appears to be a dish common across ethnic groups in eastern Anatolia. -- macrakis ( talk) 17:06, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
-- Emir Ali Enç ( talk) 03:44, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
I'm thinking we'll have to make this List of raw meat dishes, the way things are going. There is no definitive one name for this.-- King Bedford I Seek his grace 11:13, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
I will say this over and over for you Turkophiles: a dish having a Turkish name does not give you the right to present it in such a way as to make it seem "Turkish". Starting in the 15th century, Armenians who got "Turkified" spoke in Turkish and eventually the average Ottoman Armenian knew Turkish only. This is the strongest indicator why much of Western Armenian cuisine have Turkish names. If you want to "prove" a dish is "Turkish", then show me the Central Asian variant. If you cannot, then it is Armenian. I know, some of you realize this, and therefore attempt to connect everything to Central Asia, to spread Turkish cultural propaganda, like how everything came out of Cetral Asia. The nomad Turks who migrated to on their mules to Armenia packed their animals 100 meters in the air with enlightened Turkish cultural goodness to teach those backwards, uncivilized cave-dwelling Armenians how to have a culture, right? Anyway I am making changes to the way this article is presented, Chee Kufta, like many other "Turkish" dishes is not connected to Turkish anything. Thinkfood ( talk) 04:02, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
This article isn't about the history of the food and what it should be. The food in the article had a Turkish name and have been being made in Turkey for long enough time to consider it Turkish. If you would like to add anything to the history of the subject from credible sources feel free. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.197.159.86 ( talk) 00:53, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
There is no need to be xenophobic in an article about food, take it easy. Anyway, your way of proving a cultural object is childish. Please be more constructive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.41.74.111 ( talk) 17:27, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
The name "Çiğ Köfte" is unacceptable. English isn't the same as Turkish, not to mention that kufta/koefte is neither Turkish in name nor origin. Stop this Turkish propaganda BS. 99.7.123.116 ( talk) 22:29, 6 February 2014 (UTC)