A fact from Chatrak appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 9 August 2012 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have reverted this edit because this is unsourced and WP:OR.
okay Tito, I have the references on my computer, but i was too tired to search - I'll put it in with the references. However, it is impossible to demonstrate a negative: that anubrata was NOT asked is common sense for pppl who were in calcutta in 2011 and following the so called 'controversy' - but how do I gwet negative reference? please advise at your convenience (on the chatrak page; or the paoli page; or my page); I'll be guided by you.
Thanks for reading.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Manojpandeyanarchocommunist ( talk • contribs)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
added snapshot from chatrak. 'Explicit' still. Should avoid editwars here and on chatrak article. I think a still is the most NPOV one can get on this one.
Tito, specially, consider the above seriously. (see the 'chatrak' article; controversy section; picture at bottom left). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manojpandeyanarchocommunist ( talk • contribs) 00:07, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Tito, your 'listing for image deletion' is fine; but you reverted the page! the reason you gave for adding my 'adding "explicit" image' is obviously fake; you could have deleted the 'uncontroversial' image there instead.
Please see my response on your paGE: I think your prudishness *in this case* is male chauvinistic. Meanwhile;I've asked the involved parties again whether they want the image there: you'll realise it is finally not their call but the potential financiers'.... so If they advise me to removve the image I'll do so myself! And be deplrived of the opprtunity of fighting test case [the govt of india v manoj pandey would be ok; but what I'd rweally love would be:the present west bengal lumpengovernment suing me for 'uploading[*] obscene material'- that is what I am trying to engineer!] which might change film censorship rules in India for the better!
(what if someone told you I am already out on anticipatory bail on 2 counts of waging war against the state; and that I was a close freind of the assassinated Maoist leader comrade Koteshwar Rao aka Kishenji; and that it would be nice to be fighting an ostensibly different kind of case - again *for* a radical left film - but govts - and - sorry, you too - are too stupid to see that!)
[*] the supreme court of india has already ruled that *downloading* anything in private premises is a person's own business. IAs long as one is not 'Distributing' material - as defined in Law.
I am not exactly anonymous: my parents are well known figures to W Bengal authorities. .. my father died 1993; my mother chandra kala pandey was cpi(m) senator ie rajya sabha member 1993-2005 elected on cpi(m) ticket by w bengal legislators.. you can look her up on the indian rajya sabha site... I am a *extreme dissident* cpi(m) supporter.
my land line number is (+91 33) 25714833. Manojpandeyanarchocommunist ( talk) 22:42, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Move to Chatrak. Jafeluv ( talk) 07:57, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Mushrooms (film) → Chatrak (film) – Per film's common name. See the movie poster and references in the article Tito Dutta ( contact) 03:22, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Of course , it's an erotic film Zouno uttejona ( talk) 03:54, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
A fact from Chatrak appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 9 August 2012 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have reverted this edit because this is unsourced and WP:OR.
okay Tito, I have the references on my computer, but i was too tired to search - I'll put it in with the references. However, it is impossible to demonstrate a negative: that anubrata was NOT asked is common sense for pppl who were in calcutta in 2011 and following the so called 'controversy' - but how do I gwet negative reference? please advise at your convenience (on the chatrak page; or the paoli page; or my page); I'll be guided by you.
Thanks for reading.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Manojpandeyanarchocommunist ( talk • contribs)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
added snapshot from chatrak. 'Explicit' still. Should avoid editwars here and on chatrak article. I think a still is the most NPOV one can get on this one.
Tito, specially, consider the above seriously. (see the 'chatrak' article; controversy section; picture at bottom left). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manojpandeyanarchocommunist ( talk • contribs) 00:07, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Tito, your 'listing for image deletion' is fine; but you reverted the page! the reason you gave for adding my 'adding "explicit" image' is obviously fake; you could have deleted the 'uncontroversial' image there instead.
Please see my response on your paGE: I think your prudishness *in this case* is male chauvinistic. Meanwhile;I've asked the involved parties again whether they want the image there: you'll realise it is finally not their call but the potential financiers'.... so If they advise me to removve the image I'll do so myself! And be deplrived of the opprtunity of fighting test case [the govt of india v manoj pandey would be ok; but what I'd rweally love would be:the present west bengal lumpengovernment suing me for 'uploading[*] obscene material'- that is what I am trying to engineer!] which might change film censorship rules in India for the better!
(what if someone told you I am already out on anticipatory bail on 2 counts of waging war against the state; and that I was a close freind of the assassinated Maoist leader comrade Koteshwar Rao aka Kishenji; and that it would be nice to be fighting an ostensibly different kind of case - again *for* a radical left film - but govts - and - sorry, you too - are too stupid to see that!)
[*] the supreme court of india has already ruled that *downloading* anything in private premises is a person's own business. IAs long as one is not 'Distributing' material - as defined in Law.
I am not exactly anonymous: my parents are well known figures to W Bengal authorities. .. my father died 1993; my mother chandra kala pandey was cpi(m) senator ie rajya sabha member 1993-2005 elected on cpi(m) ticket by w bengal legislators.. you can look her up on the indian rajya sabha site... I am a *extreme dissident* cpi(m) supporter.
my land line number is (+91 33) 25714833. Manojpandeyanarchocommunist ( talk) 22:42, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Move to Chatrak. Jafeluv ( talk) 07:57, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Mushrooms (film) → Chatrak (film) – Per film's common name. See the movie poster and references in the article Tito Dutta ( contact) 03:22, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Of course , it's an erotic film Zouno uttejona ( talk) 03:54, 7 July 2015 (UTC)