This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pokémon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Pokémon universe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PokémonWikipedia:WikiProject PokémonTemplate:WikiProject PokémonPokémon articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
Image Copyright
Is this image copyright free?
RickK 03:57, 5 Oct 2003 (UTC)
If you click on it, it gives the Pokémon copyright.
Sonic Mew 12:00, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
Concern for the "characteristics" section...
It says that the horn in the back of its head is really a penis... Um, is this true? I'm suspecting it's vandalism, and if it's not, how about a source to verify it? If you can't put an outside source, at least state the episode or place where this was found.
Abby72420:14, 22 October 2006 (UTC)reply
An article being well-written isn't a reason to not nominate an article for GA status first before instantly tagging it, (nominating first is mandatory) and definently doesn't say anything about every other criteria in
WP:WIAGA. I've removed the GA tag.
Homestarmy03:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Well, everyone can do mistakes. I know it was just a simple mistake nominating it. But that's ok, not every article has to be perfect. If every article was perfect, there would nothing on Wikipedia to do other than vandalism reverting. I'm not saying it's a good thing that it isn't a good article. I'm just saying that not everything can be perfect, and everyone can falsely tag articles.
TheBlazikenMaster20:54, 14 April 2007 (UTC)reply
An article doesn't have to be perfect to be a GA, but it at least can't just bypass the whole system and not even have an adequate review to boot, part of the review is often how a reviewer can suggest improvements to be made in an article, and "this seemed really well-written" doesn't help much. Being well-written isn't the only GA criteria anyway....
Homestarmy02:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC)reply
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pokémon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Pokémon universe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PokémonWikipedia:WikiProject PokémonTemplate:WikiProject PokémonPokémon articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
Image Copyright
Is this image copyright free?
RickK 03:57, 5 Oct 2003 (UTC)
If you click on it, it gives the Pokémon copyright.
Sonic Mew 12:00, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
Concern for the "characteristics" section...
It says that the horn in the back of its head is really a penis... Um, is this true? I'm suspecting it's vandalism, and if it's not, how about a source to verify it? If you can't put an outside source, at least state the episode or place where this was found.
Abby72420:14, 22 October 2006 (UTC)reply
An article being well-written isn't a reason to not nominate an article for GA status first before instantly tagging it, (nominating first is mandatory) and definently doesn't say anything about every other criteria in
WP:WIAGA. I've removed the GA tag.
Homestarmy03:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Well, everyone can do mistakes. I know it was just a simple mistake nominating it. But that's ok, not every article has to be perfect. If every article was perfect, there would nothing on Wikipedia to do other than vandalism reverting. I'm not saying it's a good thing that it isn't a good article. I'm just saying that not everything can be perfect, and everyone can falsely tag articles.
TheBlazikenMaster20:54, 14 April 2007 (UTC)reply
An article doesn't have to be perfect to be a GA, but it at least can't just bypass the whole system and not even have an adequate review to boot, part of the review is often how a reviewer can suggest improvements to be made in an article, and "this seemed really well-written" doesn't help much. Being well-written isn't the only GA criteria anyway....
Homestarmy02:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC)reply