This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
All over this article are "citation needed" tags on things that, if they were to be cited, would simply be cited from the game itself. Am I the only person who thinks this is downright retarded? If I don't get justification for this weirdness, I'll be removing it.
32.156.229.187 (
talk)
01:51, 2 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Nice way to troll the guy. He has a valid point. There is no reason for all the "citation needed" tags. They're used in excess all over Wikipedia, even for things that are common knowledge. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
206.162.216.122 (
talk)
15:16, 24 April 2009 (UTC)reply
I've been watching this article for a while and now that I'm finalizing the full Mother 3 article, I'm
BOLDly redirecting this article in. The characters have not received extended discussion in secondary sources (apart from maybe
Lucas, with whom I have no beef, though I haven't quite looked into that article yet) and this current list is sourced almost entirely from primary sources or other sources heretofore declared unreliable (looking at Starmen.net though perhaps that opinion has evolved). In any event, this article collects trivia and minutiae about these characters that isn't encyclopedic in nature and would be best covered by a Wikia. Let me know if you disagree and we can discuss. czar
♔02:02, 1 September 2014 (UTC)reply
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
All over this article are "citation needed" tags on things that, if they were to be cited, would simply be cited from the game itself. Am I the only person who thinks this is downright retarded? If I don't get justification for this weirdness, I'll be removing it.
32.156.229.187 (
talk)
01:51, 2 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Nice way to troll the guy. He has a valid point. There is no reason for all the "citation needed" tags. They're used in excess all over Wikipedia, even for things that are common knowledge. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
206.162.216.122 (
talk)
15:16, 24 April 2009 (UTC)reply
I've been watching this article for a while and now that I'm finalizing the full Mother 3 article, I'm
BOLDly redirecting this article in. The characters have not received extended discussion in secondary sources (apart from maybe
Lucas, with whom I have no beef, though I haven't quite looked into that article yet) and this current list is sourced almost entirely from primary sources or other sources heretofore declared unreliable (looking at Starmen.net though perhaps that opinion has evolved). In any event, this article collects trivia and minutiae about these characters that isn't encyclopedic in nature and would be best covered by a Wikia. Let me know if you disagree and we can discuss. czar
♔02:02, 1 September 2014 (UTC)reply